SV: No Proto-Celtic?

Lars Martin Fosse lmfosse at online.no
Thu May 10 09:14:02 UTC 2001


David L. White [SMTP:dlwhite at texas.net] skrev 6. mai 2001 16:21:
>         There is good evidence of something like Semitic influence,
> sub-stratal or not, in Insular Celtic, and I suspected when I first read Dr.
> Trask's initial posting that something like this woud lie behind the views
> of the "No-Proto-Celtic" crowd.  The typological lurch of Insular Celtic
> toward Semitic, illusory (in terms of actual Semites) or not, does indeed
> make it difficult to construct a unified proto-language.  Difficult, but not
> impossible.  Such questions as how and when Insular Celtic wound up
> verb-initial and so on just have to be answered at some point.  They do no
> make proto-Celtic unviable, or suggest any such scenario as just given
> above.

As far as I know, Old Norse is also verb-initial. Should we assume Semitic
influence there too?

Would it be possible to get a list of features that point in the direction of
Semitic?

Best regards,

Lars Martin Fosse

Dr. art. Lars Martin Fosse
Haugerudvn. 76, Leil. 114,
0674 Oslo
Norway
Phone: +47 22 32 12 19
Mobile phone: +47 90 91 91 45
Fax 1:  +47 22 32 12 19
Fax 2:  +47 85 02 12 50 (InFax)
Email: lmfosse at online.no



More information about the Indo-european mailing list