<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: Competence vs. Performance: Summary</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:18.0px'><BR>
On 10/16/07 6:46 AM, "Matthew Saxton" <M.Saxton@ioe.ac.uk> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:16.0px'> “No-one has stepped forward to defend the competence-performance distinction, or even to offer supportive references.”<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:17.0px'>OK— try this—with references too!<BR>
</SPAN><SPAN STYLE='font-size:18.0px'><BR>
</SPAN><SPAN STYLE='font-size:17.0px'> The basic idea is so widespread in science that it hardly needs defense— frictionless bodies, stimulus generalization, latent learning, stereotype bias.... and linguistic competence all are more or less scientific concepts designed to variously explain conditional performance. <BR>
</SPAN><SPAN STYLE='font-size:18.0px'><BR>
</SPAN><SPAN STYLE='font-size:17.0px'> Does anyone really doubt that the language one observes is but a subset of the language one might observe under such and such conditions? And that much of that observed language is fragmentary and ill-formed? While every case demands its own explanatory story, to toss out the whole idea of competence or similar concepts sounds like a lame return to behaviorism. <BR>
<BR>
Years ago I spent a lot of time on the development of complex sentences (Limber, 1973). There was one gap in the thousands of two to three year old children’s utterances I observed -- a lack of relative clauses attached to subject NPs. <BR>
<BR>
Did this mean these kids didn’t have the potential for those structures in their behavioral repertoire—their linguistic competence? Here’s the abstract of my answer (Limber, 1976)—which curiously in connection with this current discussion, involves pragmatics.<BR>
</SPAN><SPAN STYLE='font-size:18.0px'><BR>
</SPAN><FONT SIZE="2"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:14.0px'>“Inferences about linguistic competence in children are typically based on spontaneous speech. <BR>
This poses a problem since we know that other factors are also involved in speech production. <BR>
Children who may use complex object and adverbial NPs do not use complex subject NPs. Is<BR>
this a competence deficit, a performance problem, or simply a reflection of pragmatic factors? <BR>
Evidence presented here suggests that children probably do not need complex subjects. An<BR>
extensive use of pronouns in subject but not object position indicates that pragmatics may <BR>
account for the distribution of clauses in their speech. A similar pattern in adult speech indicates there is no warrant to conclude children's lack of subject clauses reflects anything more than the nature of spontaneous speech.”<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:18.0px'><BR>
</SPAN><FONT SIZE="2"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:14.0px'> <BR>
</SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:16.0px'>In fact, in all my data of several thousand utterances of children and adults, only TWO subject NPs showed up—one shaky example from a three-year old and another from an adult. The probability that a child is exposed to a subject NP is, from my data, less than 1/1000. Here are the two:<BR>
<BR>
Adult: “</SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:16.0px'><FONT FACE="Helvetica, Verdana, Arial">Well these buses that I've had today have been really weird.”<BR>
<BR>
Child: “I think that the girl ... that's here ... doesn't ... she doesn't want me to open it. “<BR>
<BR>
I wonder how the Nuevo-Statistical approaches to language acquisition would handle this?<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></SPAN><FONT FACE="Helvetica, Verdana, Arial"><FONT SIZE="2"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:14.0px'> <BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Lucida Grande, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:17.0px'>Limber, J. (1973). The genesis of complex sentences. In T. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (pp. 169-186). New York: Academic Press.<BR>
<a href="http://pubpages.unh.edu/~jel/JLimber/Genesis_complex_sentences.pdf">http://pubpages.unh.edu/~jel/JLimber/Genesis_complex_sentences.pdf</a><BR>
<BR>
Limber, J. (1976). Unravelling competence, performance, and pragmatics in the speech of young children. Journal of Child Language, 3, 309-318.<BR>
<a href="http://pubpages.unh.edu/~jel/JLimber/pragmatics_performance.pdf">http://pubpages.unh.edu/~jel/JLimber/pragmatics_performance.pdf</a><BR>
<BR>
John Limber<BR>
University of New Hampshire<BR>
Durham NH<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Helvetica, Verdana, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:14.0px'> <BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:14.0px'><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"> <BR>
</FONT></SPAN></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:17.0px'> <BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Helvetica, Verdana, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:14.0px'>I think that the girl ... that's here ... <BR>
doesn't ... she doesn't want me to open it. <BR>
<BR>
Well these <BR>
buses that I've had today have been really weird. <BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><FONT FACE="Times, Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:13.0px'> <BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:18.0px'> <BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:16.0px'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:16.0px'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>