<HTML dir=ltr><HEAD><TITLE>LENA</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=unicode">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16608" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText1615 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>I was intrigued by Kim's description of the LENA device and agree that we should not dismiss it out of hand (perhaps just be wary of how it's being promoted). It sounds like a language equivalent of a pedometer that estimates how many steps people take in a day from their bouncing around. One of the problems is that some of them keep counting when you're in a car that bounces around too. I'm wondering if there was any validation research to look at how accurate the counting is under noisy conditions.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>On a second note about the "Clever Hans" phenomenon, there is a difference here in that the horse was simply cued to stop stomping from the subtle movements of the trainer. In the case of the infant videos you have qualitatively differentiated responses that don't seem to be cued to anything the adult is doing with his body. If the word cards on the video are doing the cuing for the infant to touch it's body parts, then that's not really a case of a Clever Hans effect, because it's the relevant stimulus that's doing the cuing. But the question again is whether we can say that the shapes of the words are actually acting as symbols in representing body parts for the infants in a non-iconic mode, even if they are not representing the phonetic values of the individual letters (which is why it presumably is not real reading per se). Perhaps if young infants can learn things like baby signs, then maybe this should not be that surprising, although we generally think of the baby signs as being a bit more iconic in nature. It might be interesting to see if infants can learn arbitrary baby signs as easily as iconic ones. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>Finally, even though there definitely is an unhealthy culture of competitive parenting, this doesn't mean that everyone who tries to extend the knowledge of their very young children is necessarily doing a bad thing. We took great pleasure in marveling at what our daughter was able to pick up about language and number at a very early age "before she was supposed to". I don't think we should be in the position of being educational Luddites and prescribe what the "natural" age is for any particular ability. Consider the case of the Emperor Charlemagne, who considered it impossible that peasants could ever learn to read. I think that it's fine if parents want to see what their kids can do; it just shouldn't turn in to a requirement. But nowadays, when preschoolers have to be interviewed and tested for entry into kindergarten, it's pretty hard to stem that flow. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>Peter</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV id=idSignature12126 dir=ltr><PRE>Peter Gordon, Associate Professor
525 W 120th St. Box 180
Biobehavioral Sciences Department
Teachers College, Columbia University
New York, NY 10027
Office Phone: (212) 678-8162
FAX: (212) 678-8233
Web Page: www.tc.edu/faculty/index.htm?facid=pg328</PRE></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> info-childes@googlegroups.com on behalf of Kim Oller<BR><B>Sent:</B> Fri 2/29/2008 1:47 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Info-CHILDES<BR><B>Subject:</B> LENA<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV><BR>
<P><FONT size=2>I am a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Infoture, Inc.,<BR>which is the producer of LENA. Perhaps rather than responding to<BR>specific interests and concerns that were expressed in the recent<BR>postings, I'll just offer to talk with anyone who wants to know about<BR>the company and the tools it has developed. Also I would encourage any<BR>one who would like to talk with people at the company directly to do<BR>so. These are very friendly and open people. Perhaps the most<BR>appropriate contact would be Jill Gilkerson at 303 441 9014 or<BR>JillGilkerson@infoture.org.<BR><BR>I wouldn't be involved if I didn't view the developments at Infoture<BR>as extremely positive and indeed fundamentally important to our<BR>futures, both scientific and clinical. Infoture invested heavily to<BR>develop a battery-powered recording device that weighs about an ounce<BR>and yields good quality (16kHz) data for 16 consecutive hours. Further<BR>they have developed extremely intriguing software that processes the<BR>data to yield a variety of automatic measures -- in particular, pretty<BR>reliable counts of adult words spoken in the sample, child<BR>vocalizations, and conversational turns. Much more is on the way, and<BR>the software itself is rapidly continuing to be improved and<BR>enhanced.<BR><BR>These developments are going to be extremely useful for those of us<BR>who are interested in large scale naturalistic sampling that can be<BR>done all day long in the home. I am recording now with LENA and intend<BR>to do longterm, longitudinal research using it, including research<BR>employing neural network approaches that need really large quantities<BR>of data. Infoture is not just developing devices -- they already have<BR>over 40,000 hours of recording, much of it on a carefully stratified<BR>longitudinal sample. This sample is going to be a tremendous resource<BR>for research, and Infoture has done very significant research with it<BR>already. Collaborators from a variety of universities are already<BR>seeking to use the database for specialized projects, and Infoture is<BR>making adaptations to encourage that kind of collaboration and<BR>utilization of the data.<BR><BR>In part my enthusiasm about this is due to my belief that laboratory-<BR>based research needs to be supplemented with large-sample naturalistic<BR>research. I don't think it is likely that we will be able to process<BR>really large samples without automated preprocessing. So the Infoture<BR>efforts are laying infrastructure for critical research,<BR><BR><BR></FONT></P></DIV><br>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~<br>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Info-CHILDES" group. <br> To post to this group, send email to info-childes@googlegroups.com <br> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to info-childes-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com <br> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/info-childes?hl=en <br> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---<br>
</BODY></HTML><br>