<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: Question about word tokens and new words on CLAN</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Lucida Grande"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><BR>
I am sorry, but I have to STOP this discussion at this point. Please lets continue this discussion on </SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><FONT COLOR="#0000FF"><FONT FACE="Tahoma, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><U><a href="chibolts@googlegroups.com">chibolts@googlegroups.com</a>.</U></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Lucida Grande"> I am going to post the answer to this message to chibolts.<BR>
<BR>
Thanks, <BR>
Leonid.<BR>
<BR>
On 28-05-09 15:21, "Schneider, Phyllis" <<a href="phyllis.schneider@ualberta.ca">phyllis.schneider@ualberta.ca</a>> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></SPAN><BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><FONT FACE="Lucida Grande"><BR>
<BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#808000"><FONT FACE="Arial">Leonid,<BR>
</FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Lucida Grande"> <BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#808000"><FONT FACE="Arial">Could it be simply that the input from the command is so great that the first part is lost due to space limitations? I have had that happen with large data sets, but I don't know whether that still happens. The entire set of results appears, but the earliest ones disappear at some point as more results are added to the end.<BR>
</FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Lucida Grande"> <BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#808000"><FONT FACE="Arial">--Phyllis Schneider<BR>
</FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Lucida Grande"><BR>
<HR ALIGN=CENTER SIZE="3" WIDTH="100%"></FONT><FONT FACE="Tahoma, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><B>From:</B> <a href="info-childes@googlegroups.com">info-childes@googlegroups.com</a> [<a href="mailto:info-childes@googlegroups.com">mailto:info-childes@googlegroups.com</a>] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Leonid Spektor<BR>
<B>Sent:</B> Thursday, May 28, 2009 11:43 AM<BR>
<B>To:</B> <a href="info-childes@googlegroups.com">info-childes@googlegroups.com</a>; <a href="chibolts@googlegroups.com">chibolts@googlegroups.com</a><BR>
<B>Subject:</B> Re: Question about word tokens and new words on CLAN<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Lucida Grande"><BR>
Carolyn,<BR>
<BR>
The proper place to post this kind of question is on <FONT COLOR="#0000FF"><U><a href="chibolts@googlegroups.com">chibolts@googlegroups.com</a>.</U></FONT> I am posting a reply to both chibolts and info-childes address in case you do not subscribe to chibolts Google Group yet.<BR>
<BR>
There is no database size limit set in CLAN except for the memory size on your computer. Freq command should be able to count all words in database. The problem might be the format of email messages in CLAN system or the commands and options you use. Also, please make sure that you have the latest version of CLAN. To diagnose the problems you are describing it would be very helpful to me if you could email me a sample of your data and the command line you are using at <a href="spektor@andrew.cmu.edu">spektor@andrew.cmu.edu</a>. If you are not comfortable to email to me any sample of your data, then please just describe it and exactly what kind of analyzes you are trying run conduct. Is your data in just a plain text format or is it in fully legal CHAT format? If you are trying to simply get a frequency count of all words you can use "freq +y *.cha" command. That is assuming that your data file(s) have ".cha" extension. If you are trying to get just count of words associated with a particular speaker and your data is in legal CHAT format, then you can add "+t*CHI" option to above command. The "*CHI" refers to a speaker name in your data files.<BR>
<BR>
Hope this help,<BR>
Leonid.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 28-05-09 10:22, "Carolyn Piazza" <<a href="carolynpiazza@gmail.com">carolynpiazza@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></SPAN><BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><FONT FACE="Lucida Grande">To the info-childes google group,<BR>
<BR>
I'm not sure if this is the place to send questions, but if it is not, perhaps someone can point me to the right place. <BR>
I am working on data based on email messages and have placed some 366 emails into the CLAN system. When I run a frequency count, the outcome is words beginning with the letters O to Z. The words beginning with A-N are missing. Is there a certain data base size in which the program will not accurately process? Thanks, in advance, to whomever can answer this.<BR>
<BR>
Best regards,<BR>
Carolyn Piazza<BR>
<a href="cpiazza@fsu.edu">cpiazza@fsu.edu</a><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></SPAN></BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><FONT FACE="Lucida Grande"><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></SPAN></BLOCKQUOTE>
<br>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~<br>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Info-CHILDES" group. <br> To post to this group, send email to info-childes@googlegroups.com <br> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to info-childes+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com <br> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/info-childes?hl=en<br>
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---<br>
</BODY>
</HTML>
<br>