<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">
<div>
<div>
<div>Dear colleagues,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>(apologies if this is duplicated--I tried to send this message yesterday but don't think it went through.)</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I've noticed lately that my almost-3-year-old overgeneralizes the -en suffix on passive participles. For example, she has said things like "This one didn't get cutten" and "I need to be scooten" (=scooted closer to the table). And I've heard her say "putten"
before. I recall reading examples of this sort in the Crain, et al. (1987) study of children's passives, but I'm wondering if anyone has specifically looked at this morphological overgeneralization. How common is it? I'm also wondering how frequent these forms
are in the input (as opposed to -ed or -0 participles). Has anyone looked at this?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks in advance,</div>
<div>Misha</div>
<div>
<div>-- </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Misha Becker</div>
<div>Associate Professor</div>
<div>UNC Linguistics Department</div>
<div>301 Smith Building, CB#3155</div>
<div>Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3155</div>
<div>mbecker@email.unc.edu</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</body>
</html>
<p></p>
-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Info-CHILDES" group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to info-childes+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />
To post to this group, send email to info-childes@googlegroups.com.<br />
For more options, visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br />
<br />
<br />