[Lexicog] Re: lexical entries as singulars or plurals

Kenneth C. Hill kennethchill at YAHOO.COM
Thu Aug 25 02:50:32 UTC 2005


I think an important difference between "isst" and "ist" is that "isst"
tends to be stressed and "ist" tends to be weak. I bet "man ist was man
isst" (one is what one eats) and "man isst was man ist" (one eats what one
is) are not homophonous.

A parallel in English might be the difference between "too" or "two" and
"to". Stressed "too" and "two" are truly homophonous and there are jokes
exploiting this homonomy; but "to", though consisting of the same sequence
of segmental phonemes, is hardly ever pronounced in such a way that anyone
might wonder whether "to" or "too/two" was intended.

--Ken

--- Fritz Goerling <Fritz_Goerling at sil.org> wrote:

> There are linguistic rules and there are exceptions to them. In dynamic
> speech
> one can choose to create all kinds of effects by deliberately ignoring
> or violating all kinds of rules.
> 
> Fritz
> 
>   I don't think before stops you can have a long/short or fortis/lenis
> contrast.
> 
>   Robert
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: Fritz Goerling
>     To: lexicographylist at yahoogroups.com
>     Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 1:27 AM
>     Subject: RE: [Lexicog] Re: lexical entries as singulars or plurals
> 
> 
>     For me they are identical in pronunciation in normal speech. Maybe
> an actor or someone
>     who recites poetry might exaggerate and make the difference by
> hissing the double "s".
>     Or someone who wants to emphasize the difference in this little
> saying might just put more
>     stress on the "isst." Or there is a discussion where someone says
> "Man ist was man liest"
>     (One is what one reads) to which someone more given to the pleasures
> of the palate might
>     reply "Nein, man ist was man ISST" (No, one is what one eats).
> 
>     Fritz Goerling
>       Fritz Goerling wrote:
>       > the point of the little world-play is in the similar-sounding
>       > "ist" (= is) and "isst" (= eats).
> 
>       Are they similar sounding, or identical?  If different, what is
> the
>       difference?  (I vaguely recall my German prof claiming that they
> were
>       pronounced differently, but not being able to hear any diff.  Of
> course,
>       that was before my linguistics days.)
>       --
>             Mike Maxwell
>             Linguistic Data Consortium
>             maxwell at ldc.upenn.edu
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/HKE4lB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lexicographylist/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    lexicographylist-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



More information about the Lexicography mailing list