<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1543" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Ron -- </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>In terms of order of magnitude those figures feel
intuitively about right, but is there any evidence to support them?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=ron_moe@sil.org href="mailto:ron_moe@sil.org">Ron Moe</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=lexicographylist@yahoogroups.com
href="mailto:lexicographylist@yahoogroups.com">lexicographylist@yahoogroups.com</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, May 31, 2006 11:53
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: [Lexicog] Semantic
parsing</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=330195021-31052006><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Patrick Hanks wrote:</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=330195021-31052006><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=330195021-31052006><FONT size=2>I guess all this reinforces
the point that semantic tagging is more problematic than part-of-speeech <FONT
size=2>tagging. </FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=330195021-31052006><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=330195021-31052006><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>There are between 10 and 100 grammatical categories in a language.
There are between 1,000 and 10,000 semantic categories. So we are about two
orders of magnitude greater in semantics. I'm not a mathematician, but I
believe complexity works exponentially.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=330195021-31052006><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=330195021-31052006><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Ron
Moe</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
lexicographylist@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:lexicographylist@yahoogroups.com]<B>On Behalf Of </B>Patrick
Hanks<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, May 31, 2006 8:58 AM<BR><B>To:</B>
lexicographylist@yahoogroups.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Lexicog] Semantic
parsing<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>David Frank wrote:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>> What am I missing?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Nothing -- Well not much, anyway.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>The problem in this case is the word 'resemble', not
FrameNet. You could not have chosen a less
instructive </FONT><FONT size=2>frame than the Similarity Frame in FN
(of which "resemble" is a member). </FONT><FONT
size=2> </FONT><FONT size=2>Anything can resemble anything, so semantic
tagging of valences isn't going to </FONT><FONT size=2>shed much light
on the </FONT><FONT size=2>meaning. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>To be fair, this frame does mention that there is a
[[Dimension]] </FONT><FONT size=2>in respect of which similarity is
measured. That seems somewhat helpful. (The [[Dimension]] may be mentioned
explicitly, or left to the imagination -- but it's still there in the
semantics of "resemble", even when not explicit.) </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>FN says:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>
<TABLE id=frames cellSpacing=0 bgColor=#ffffff border=0 vspace="0">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT></TD>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top width=85 cellpadding="4"><FONT
style="COLOR: #ffffff; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #9400d3">Dimension []</FONT><BR></TD>
<TD vAlign=top align=left width=500 colSpan=2>This FE marks
constituents which express a property in respect to which the
similarity of the entities is assessed. </TD></TR>
<TR vAlign=center align=left>
<TD width=85> </TD>
<TD width=85> </TD>
<TD width=500>The disc announced Friday is <FONT
style="COLOR: #ffffff; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #9400d3">physically</FONT>
<FONT style="COLOR: #ffffff; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #000000">SIMILAR</FONT>
to current music CDs </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT face=Arial>* * </FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Comparison with "represent", which is in the
Communicate_categorization frame, is quite
thought-provoking.</FONT></DIV></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I guess all this reinforces the point that semantic
tagging is more problematic than part-of-speeech </FONT><FONT
size=2>tagging. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Patrick</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=david_frank@sil.org href="mailto:david_frank@sil.org">David
Frank</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=lexicographylist@yahoogroups.com
href="mailto:lexicographylist@yahoogroups.com">lexicographylist@yahoogroups.com</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, May 31, 2006 5:01
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Lexicog] Semantic
parsing</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2>from David Frank:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2>I was interested to hear about
FrameNet. I am doing a study that includes an analysis of the word
"resemble," and I have been wondering how Fillmore would analyze the case
frame for that verb, as compared with, for example, "represent," and I
wasn't sure how to find out.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2>However, after looking at the
FrameNet web site, I am disappointed. The analysis of "resemble" I found
at <A
href="http://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=118&le=7974">http://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=118&le=7974&</A></FONT><FONT
face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2> is something like the following (using my
own example):</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2>That cloud resembles a bear
= [[Entity_1]] resembles [[Entity_2]].</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2>Additionally, there is a
definition given for "resemble": "have a similar appearance to or features
in common with." "Entity" as a frame is defined as "A thing (either
abstract or physical) that exists with some degree of permanence." There
are no insights as to the relationship between Entity_1 and
Entity_2.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2>To me this is not very helpful.
What am I missing?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2>----- Original Message -----
</FONT>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2>From: <</FONT><A
href="mailto:rtroike@email.arizona.edu"><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS"
size=2>rtroike@email.arizona.edu</FONT></A><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS"
size=2>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2>To: <</FONT><A
href="mailto:lexicographylist@yahoogroups.com"><FONT
face="Arial Unicode MS"
size=2>lexicographylist@yahoogroups.com</FONT></A><FONT
face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2>Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006
4:01 AM</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2>Subject: [Lexicog] Semantic
parsing</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS"><BR><FONT
size=2></FONT></FONT></DIV><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS" size=2>Patrick's
excellent and very clear exposition of the problem of semantic<BR>parsing
is exactly what is being addressed in Charles Fillmore's
seemingly<BR>little known Framenet project, which is using frame semantics
to set up an<BR>automatic semantic annotation system. The url for the
project is:<BR><BR> </FONT><A
href="http://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/"><FONT face="Arial Unicode MS"
size=2>http://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/</FONT></A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>
<!-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| -->
<br><br>
<div style="width:500px; text-align:right; margin-bottom:1px; color:#909090;">
<tt>SPONSORED LINKS</tt>
</div>
<table bgcolor=#e0ecee cellspacing="13" cellpadding="0" width=500px>
<tr valign=top>
<td style="width:25%;">
<tt><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Science+kits&w1=Science+kits&w2=Science+education&w3=Science+kit+for+kid&w4=Cognitive+science&w5=Science+education+supply&w6=My+first+science+kit&c=6&s=145&.sig=0qmh_LxwxM-rDbioCJFS6Q">Science kits</a></tt>
</td>
<td style="width:25%;">
<tt><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Science+education&w1=Science+kits&w2=Science+education&w3=Science+kit+for+kid&w4=Cognitive+science&w5=Science+education+supply&w6=My+first+science+kit&c=6&s=145&.sig=Excj8HDtQcq_AebnkeeGWA">Science education</a></tt>
</td>
<td style="width:25%;">
<tt><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Science+kit+for+kid&w1=Science+kits&w2=Science+education&w3=Science+kit+for+kid&w4=Cognitive+science&w5=Science+education+supply&w6=My+first+science+kit&c=6&s=145&.sig=TKv0Pos6NUkT3-2vw9y_0g">Science kit for kid</a></tt>
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign=top>
<td style="width:25%;">
<tt><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Cognitive+science&w1=Science+kits&w2=Science+education&w3=Science+kit+for+kid&w4=Cognitive+science&w5=Science+education+supply&w6=My+first+science+kit&c=6&s=145&.sig=4LhN5e-euwMZLUgPOsoG9Q">Cognitive science</a></tt>
</td>
<td style="width:25%;">
<tt><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Science+education+supply&w1=Science+kits&w2=Science+education&w3=Science+kit+for+kid&w4=Cognitive+science&w5=Science+education+supply&w6=My+first+science+kit&c=6&s=145&.sig=I_uaOJi7S2ku24m3Ad-zTQ">Science education supply</a></tt>
</td>
<td style="width:25%;">
<tt><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=My+first+science+kit&w1=Science+kits&w2=Science+education&w3=Science+kit+for+kid&w4=Cognitive+science&w5=Science+education+supply&w6=My+first+science+kit&c=6&s=145&.sig=XpTpH51aY4wda-bBFInovQ">My first science kit</a></tt>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
</table>
<!-- |**|end egp html banner|**| -->
<!-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| -->
<br>
<div style="text-align:center; color:#909090; width:500px;">
<hr style="border-bottom:1px; width:500px; text-align:left;">
<tt>YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS</tt>
</div>
<br>
<ul>
<tt><li type=square> Visit your group "<a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lexicographylist">lexicographylist</a>" on the web.<br> </tt>
<tt><li type=square> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:<br> <a href="mailto:lexicographylist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe">lexicographylist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com</a><br> </tt>
<tt><li type=square> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <a href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">Yahoo! Terms of Service</a>.</tt>
</ul>
<br>
<div style="text-align:center; color:#909090; width:500px;">
<hr style="border-bottom:1px; width:500px; text-align:left;">
</div>
</br>
<!-- |**|end egp html banner|**| -->
</BODY></HTML>