<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
<div>There are, of course, non-atomic versions of argument encoding inspired by Fillmore's early work and Dowty 1990 on</div>
<div>proto-properties. I don't know of computational implementations, but there's the work that John Moore and I did, John</div>
<div>Beavers, Beatrice Primus and other literature that follows this tradition. -Farrell</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<br>
<div>
<div>On Feb 2, 2014, at 2:22 PM, "Emily M. Bender" <<a href="mailto:ebender@UW.EDU">ebender@UW.EDU</a>></div>
<div> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Dear Adam,<br>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I looked into this some for my recent book, and from what I could find, no one has ever produced a fully comprehensive set of semantic roles (see Ch 8, thing #68). I'm not familiar with Sowa's system, but I think what's going on in VerbNet is that role
names are re-used across predicates but not meant to carry the same content in those different uses. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Emily</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:16px;text-align:justify">Bender, Emily M. 2013. </span><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2200/S00493ED1V01Y201303HLT020" style="margin:0px;padding:0px;font-size:16px;vertical-align:baseline;color:rgb(53,76,153);text-decoration:none;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;text-align:justify"><i style="margin:0px;padding:0px;border:0px;outline:0px;vertical-align:baseline;background-color:transparent">Linguistic
Fundamentals for Natural Language Processing: 100 Essentials from Morphology and Syntax</i></a><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:16px;text-align:justify">. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies
#20. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.</span><br>
</div>
<div><span style="text-align:justify"><font color="#333333" face="Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3"><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2200/S00493ED1V01Y201303HLT020">http://dx.doi.org/10.2200/S00493ED1V01Y201303HLT020</a></font><br>
</span></div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Adam Przepiorkowski <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:adamp@ipipan.waw.pl" target="_blank">adamp@ipipan.waw.pl</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Dear All,<br>
<br>
[Apologies for cross-posting.]<br>
<br>
In the context of enriching the Polish LFG grammar with semantic<br>
representation, we are looking for a set of semantic roles (Agent,<br>
Patient, Beneficiary, etc.) that could be used to mark arguments (and<br>
possibly adjuncts) of verbs and other predicates. This set should be<br>
exhaustive in the sense that it should be possible to assign – more or<br>
less deterministically – a semantic role to any argument (and possibly<br>
adjunct) of any predicate. For this reason the standard – in LFG<br>
textbooks – sets of some 7 semantic roles do not seem sufficient.<br>
Instead, we are looking at larger repertoires proposed in VerbNet, in<br>
FrameNet and in John W. Sowa's work on Knowledge Representation.<br>
<br>
We don't have any strong views about any particular set of semantic<br>
roles, as long as it is exhaustive and applicable to real texts (as<br>
opposed to being merely theoretically interesting). Has anybody in the<br>
LFG community faced a similar task? If so, what set of semantic roles<br>
would you recommend? At the moment, we are wavering between VerbNet and<br>
Sowa's system, both being more manageable than numerous roles offered<br>
in FrameNet, but we are open to other solutions.<br>
<br>
Many thanks, best regards,<br>
<br>
Adam P.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Adam Przepiórkowski ˈadam ˌpʃɛpjurˈkɔfskʲi<br>
<a href="http://clip.ipipan.waw.pl/" target="_blank">http://clip.ipipan.waw.pl/</a> ____ Computational Linguistics in Poland<br>
<a href="http://jlm.ipipan.waw.pl/" target="_blank">http://jlm.ipipan.waw.pl/</a> ___________ Journal of Language Modelling<br>
<a href="http://zil.ipipan.waw.pl/" target="_blank">http://zil.ipipan.waw.pl/</a> ____________ Linguistic Engineering Group<br>
<a href="http://nkjp.pl/" target="_blank">http://nkjp.pl/</a> _________________________ National Corpus of Polish<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ParSem mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ParSem@mailman.uni-konstanz.de">ParSem@mailman.uni-konstanz.de</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/parsem" target="_blank">https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/parsem</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
Emily M. Bender<br>
Associate Professor<br>
Department of Linguistics<br>
Check out CLMS on facebook! <a href="http://www.facebook.com/uwclma" target="_blank">
http://www.facebook.com/uwclma</a><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</body>
</html>