[lg policy] An argument for the continued teaching of ASL to deaf children

[Harold Schiffman]

 Forwarded  edling at lists.sis.utsa.edu


Examiner.com



An argument for the continued teaching of ASL to deaf children



Hi! I would like to share about the article written by Francois
Grosjean who provided his perspective by researching Deaf children.
The article mentioned that ASL should be the primary language of a
Deaf child. Despite the use of various technological aids ( i.e.
cochlear implants), sign language is mandatory period. Why? I will
explain the reasons for you to think about it.



Full story:

http://www.examiner.com/x-18638-Adams-County-Special-Needs-Kids-Examiner~y2009m8d29-An-argument-for-the-continued-teaching-of-ASL-to-deaf-children

_______________________________________________




-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents.
Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal.
(H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list