[lg policy] bibitem: High-Stakes Tests and Educational Language Policy in Japan: An Analysis of the National Center English Test from the Viewpoint of Education for International Understanding

Harold Schiffman hfsclpp at GMAIL.COM
Thu Jul 8 14:32:33 UTC 2010


High-Stakes Tests and Educational Language Policy in Japan: An
Analysis of the National Center English Test from the Viewpoint of
Education for International Understanding

TESOL Journal
Vol. 2, pp. 175-188
(c)2010
http://www.tesol-journal.com

Abstract
Deepening international understanding is one of the most important
educational language policies for high schools in Japan. However, the
possibility of the negative washback effect of university English
entrance examinations on the implementation of the policy has been
raised. Therefore, this study analyzed the National Center Tests--the
highest-stakes form of university entrance examinations--from the
viewpoint of education for international understanding since washback
is generated by test content. A careful consideration was given to
both interrater reliability and inner reliability throughout the
analysis. The results of this study indicated that only a few
particular topics and nations appeared in the tests. This result
suggests that high school students might be able to develop only a
part of their international understanding. However, those who attempt
to go on to national or municipal universities need to take individual
national/municipal university tests as well. Therefore, the content of
these tests also has to be analyzed. Furthermore, the objectives of
university English entrance examinations should be analyzed from the
viewpoint of education for international understanding

More at: http://www.tesol-journal.com/PDF/A12V2_TESOL.pdf

-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents.
Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal,
and to write directly to the original sender of any offensive message.
 A copy of this may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman,
Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list



More information about the Lgpolicy-list mailing list