[lg policy] South Africa: Supreme Court of Appeal reserve judgment in UFS language policy appeal

Harold Schiffman hfsclpp at gmail.com
Fri Nov 4 15:18:04 UTC 2016


Supreme Court of Appeal reserve judgment in UFS language policy appeal
ANDRE GROBLER
17:05 (GMT+2) Thu, 03 Nov 2016
[image: Supreme Court of Appeal reserve judgment in UFS language policy
appeal | News Article]
*Bloemfontein - Aspects such as irreparable harm and prejudice suffered by
a party must be based on facts, the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) heard on
Thursday. *


This was submitted by counsel of the University of the Free State (UFS) in
argument in their appeal hearing in the SCA on Thursday.

A full bench of five judges was hearing argument in the appeal against High
Court judgments in favour of AfriForum and Solidarity regarding the
implementation of the university's new language policy for 2017. The new
policy will eventually result in English being the mainstream instruction
language on campus.

Counsel for the UFS, Jeremy Gauntlett, argued among others that the lower
court has overlooked a crucial fact in its case and in judgment in that the
new policy will be implemented on a pilot basis. He argued that AfriForum
has failed to show that students in these three pilot faculties will suffer
irreparable harm from next year.

AfriForum's counsel, Johan du Toit, submitted the civil right group's
litigation was not premature. He was answering questions from the bench on
missing aspects of prejudice towards AfriForum and Solidarity in their
papers. The judges wanted to know whether the aspect of prejudice will not
happen after the language policy is implemented. Several students and
academic personnel attended the hearing at court.

The court's judgment was reserved for a later date.
- See more at:
http://www.ofm.co.za/article/local-news/208540/supreme-court-of-appeal-reserve-judgment-in-ufs-language-policy-appeal-#sthash.MdVgLlyY.dpuf


-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message.  A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20161104/a877956d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list


More information about the Lgpolicy-list mailing list