[lg policy] Jamaica: Hubert Devonish | Of Patwa, progress and prosperity

Mon Jan 23 16:43:28 UTC 2017

 Hubert Devonish | Of Patwa, progress and prosperity (Part 1)
<http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/focus/20170122/hubert-devonish-patwa-progress-and-prosperity-part-1#>
<http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/focus/20170122/hubert-devonish-patwa-progress-and-prosperity-part-1#>
<http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/focus/20170122/hubert-devonish-patwa-progress-and-prosperity-part-1#>
Published:Sunday | January 22, 2017 | 12:00 AM

   -

Between 1990 and the present, the performance of the education system, in
spite of its numerous problems, has clearly improved. This is true of the
percentage of the age cohort enrolled at all levels of the system; the
percentage of the cohort taking examinations at the various levels; and the
percentage passes, particularly in that magical subject, English.

Disappointingly, none of these improvements have reflected themselves in
the productivity of the labour force. According to the governor of the Bank
of Jamaica, between 1990 and 2010, "... labour productivity, which measures
output per worker, contracted at an average rate of 0.5 per cent per year
... ". Furthermore, between 2009 and 2013, the fall in productivity
averages 0.8 per cent. This is terrible when compared with the average
global annual increase in the productivity of labour of 1.8 per cent over
the last 50 years or so.

Why would a marked improvement of the performance of an education system
seem to have the opposite of the expected effect on the productivity of
workers in Jamaica? Maybe the answer lies in the absence from the education
system of the formal use of the Jamaican language, the native language of
the vast majority of those in the school system.

The first thing people say in the discussion about what language(s) should
be used and taught in schools in Jamaica is that our economy depends on the
outside world and that that world operates in English. English, they argue,
is the pathway to progress and prosperity.

In reality, the wealth needed for progress and prosperity is being produced
in declining quantities by the workers of Jamaica at precisely the time
when they are much better educated. Their education is, as we know,
provided by a system that officially uses English as the only medium of
instruction from grade three onwards. The system also employs English as
the only medium for learning and practising literacy. Perhaps, education
almost exclusively in English is a barrier, rather than a bridge, to
progress and prosperity, hence the falling productivity rates.

What's the Competition Doing?

Jamaica and its workforce are wide open to regional and international
competition. This is a result of the country having made international
trade commitments via the WTO, the European Union, and CARICOM to open up
its markets. Jamaican workers directly compete with every other worker in
the world. It means that the best practices globally in workforce
education, training, and preparation are needed to keep Jamaica in the
race. Jamaica cannot survive if the value of what every Jamaican worker
produces keeps falling every year. In such a situation, Jamaican workers
and the Jamaican economy would be wiped out by global competition, with
Jamaicans reduced to being impoverished consumers of imported goods and
services.

Education is passed on through language, with reading and writing being
learnt and exercised through it. Language is also the medium by which all
other non-language subjects, including science, technology, engineering,
and mathematics are learnt. An appropriate language education policy is the
base on which all other workforce education can be built, or from which it
can fall.

Is education exclusively in English helping in the fight to make Jamaican
workers competitive? Falling productivity in Jamaica suggests that the
answer might be no. One way to check this out is to look at international
best practice. Put another way, what are our competitors ahead of us in the
race for progress and prosperity doing that we are not?

What is the situation with the top 20 countries and territories in the
per-capita GDP (PPP) rankings in the area of language policy and language
education? Seven - the USA in fifth place in the rankings, Singapore in
seventh, Australia in ninth, Ireland in 11th, Canada in 12th, the UK in
16th, and Hong Kong in 18th use English as at least one of their languages
of education. Four of their seven - Singapore with Chinese (Mandarin),
Canada with French, Ireland with Irish, and Hong Kong with Cantonese - have
other languages of education in official use alongside English.

Second languages not disastrous

Employing English as a major language of education does not prevent these
economically prosperous countries from having another language of education
coexisting with English within the education system. This suggests that the
bilingual education option, involving both English and Jamaican as
languages of education, may not have the disastrous economic effects its
critics suggest.

The top four countries in per-capita GDP are Luxembourg with French/German/
Luxembourgeois as languages of education; Switzerland with
French/German/Italian/Romans in that role; Qatar with Arabic, and Norway
with Norwegian as languages of education. The fact that English is the
language of education of the USA has not, given its fifth-place ranking,
granted it any particular advantage in the per capita GDP rankings.

Furthermore, for countries to be in the select group of top 20 in per
capita GDP, there is no need for English to be a medium of instruction, or
for any single language to be used as a medium either.

What is really important, however, is that there is no country in the top
20 that pursues a language education policy similar to Jamaica's. No
country uses as its only language of instruction one that is not the native
language of the majority of pupils in the school system and at the same
time refuses to teach literacy skills in a language identified as native to
that population.

Of special interest is Singapore, at No. 6, with English as its medium of
instruction. 'Singa-rich', as some of its admirers have dubbed it, is often
touted as the economic model for Jamaica, and as a model for language
education, too. Education in Singapore is multilingual. The country has
four official languages - English, Chinese, Malay, and Tamil. Of these,
English is promoted as the common language, binding all language groups,
and as the main language of education, administration and business.

Learning from our Competitors

English is the medium of instruction, used to teach all non-language
subjects right throughout the school system. In addition, depending on
ethnic background, children study one of the other official languages -
Chinese, Tamil, or Malay - and are taught literacy in those languages. The
most academically gifted 20 per cent of secondary-school students are
targeted to develop the highest levels of competence in Chinese in addition
to the proficiency in English required of the entire school population. It
is only the academically less able that are expected to have high-level
proficiency in English and no other language.

Language-education policy and practice in the countries that Jamaica holds
as models of progress invariably include a mass vernacular as one of the
languages of education. The labour productivity rates of those countries
are increasing while those of Jamaica are decreasing. Meanwhile, Jamaica
has lauded itself over the past decade and a half on achieving one success
after the other in its education system.

There has been marked improvement in the literacy skills of children in the
education system as measured by the Grade Four Literacy Test results,
significant increases in the percentage of higher-level performances at
CSEC, notably in English, and a much larger age-group cohort completing
secondary school. If all your indicators are signalling improvement in
education, but productivity, which should be linked to education, is
heading in the opposite direction, why are we fiddling while the economy
burns?

Addressing the language education issue, by formally including the Jamaican
Language, alongside English, in a fully bilingual education system is the
only option. This inclusion of a mass vernacular in bilingual and
multilingual education systems is what our competitors have done, and they
are beating us hands down in the area of worker productivity and economic
competitiveness.

- Professor Hubert Devonish is coordinator of the Jamaican Language Unit.
Email feedback to columns at gleanerjm.com and hubert.devonish at uwimona.edu.jm.
http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/focus/20170122/hubert-devonish-patwa-progress-and-prosperity-part-1

-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message.  A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20170123/02596bfe/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list