[lg policy] Today, Microsoft’s code of conduct might affect cyberbullies. What will tomorrow bring, though?

Fri Mar 30 14:54:38 UTC 2018

 Today, Microsoft’s code of conduct might affect cyberbullies. What will
tomorrow bring, though?

Remember that scene in *Demolition Man* where Sylvester Stallone wakes up
in a dystopian future and is almost immediately fined for cursing in
public? Wasn’t that an incredibly funny moment based entirely on the fact
that such a future would never, ever happen?

Well, today, Microsoft announced new language in their terms of service
policies which clarify that the company is able to serve penalties,
suspensions, and bans against people who use “offensive language” across
Xbox Live, Skype, and other Microsoft services.

Maybe Microsoft is enforcing this code of conduct on itself because the
wording of the official policy is as careful as it can be. It states:
“Don’t publicly display or use the Services to share inappropriate content
or material (involving, for example, nudity, bestiality, pornography,
offensive language, graphic violence, or criminal activity).”

We’re not entirely sure how nudity, pornography, and bestiality are so
casually lumped together – or how Microsoft intends to crack down on
graphic violence when it publishes and develop several graphically violent
games, such as *Gears of War* and *State of Decay* – but that’s a
conversation for another day.

For the moment, it’s the “offensive language” warning that is drawing the
attention. The biggest issue is that Microsoft makes no effort to explain
what constitutes offensive language. There’s a code of conduct section for
Xbox Live, but it generically notes “Profane words or phrases.” We assume
that ****, ****, and ****** are strictly out, but what about ****, *****,
and ******?

Seemingly aware of the tentative nature of this policy, Microsoft included
a couple of disclaimers. First off, the company notes that it cannot
“monitor the entire Services” and will make “no attempt to do so.” That
suggests that Microsoft is not implementing live monitoring. However, it
*can* access stored and shared content when looking into “alleged
violations.” This indicates that part of this policy will work off of a
user report system.

Microsoft also states that it can remove or refuse to publish content for
“any reason” and reserves the right to block “delivery of a communication”
across services attached to this content policy. Additionally, the
punishments for breaking this code of conduct now include the “forfeiture
of content licenses” as well as “Microsoft account balances associated with
the account.” That means that the company could theoretically remove games
from your console or seize money in your Microsoft account.

Those who are defending this policy point out that Microsoft essentially
admits its ability to enforce such restrictions are limited. Furthermore,
some are imagining that this will be used to implement a system of
punishment for overly eager young *Call of Duty* players who use their
microphones to suggest what they and your mother will be doing that
evening. While there are noble ways this policy can be used to crack down
on harassment, viewing this code of conduct in such a way requires a level
of optimism that borders on foolishness.

Microsoft has always been within its rights to ban users for both actual
crimes and code of conduct violations. As *Gizmodo* points out, Microsoft
has always had strict rules regarding pornography, bestiality, and the like
in its code of conduct. In fact, past versions of the code of conduct have
restricted “profane words or phrases.” Microsoft also reserved “the right
to review Your Content” in the past. They’ve even since issued a statement
to IGN that clarifies that this new language issued in an effort to make
their policies more transparent. That hasn’t changed.

What has changed is our understanding of the extent of what constitutes a
policy violation across all Microsoft services as well as the punishments
that Microsoft can enforce. The clarification of the “offensive language”
clause means that a large group of people who probably never had to think
of policy violations before can no longer be quite as sure they are
behaving as Microsoft seemingly intends for them to behave. The increased
punishments said violations may result in also invoke fears some modern
consumers possess regarding what real rights they have to their digital
content.

The wider net this particular policy change casts seems to be similar to
Craigslist’s recent decision to shut down its personals section in response
to the recent FOSTA bill (a bill designed to crack down on online sex
trafficking but is vague enough to possibly affect even consensual sexual
arrangements made online). In other words, Microsoft wants to legally
distance itself from any possibility of being associated with the actions
of its users.

We’ve long looked towards corporations and governments and asked what they
are prepared to do about how we interact with each other. Well, we’re now
starting to hear their response.

I know, you don’t want politics in your video games and other forms of
escapism. Truth be told, I don’t either. That’s the point, though. Policies
like this are making it impossible to ignore the ways in which our means of
communication and escape are becoming ever more open to those who would
wish to monitor them for purposes both frighteningly clear and disturbingly
vague.

The inclusion of a vague term like “offensive language” in this new policy
is troubling because it technically leaves the decision of what’s
“offensive” solely to Microsoft, which can then penalize you financially.
Virtually every user curses once in a while on Xbox Live, shares a dirty
word on a Word document, or maybe even says things he/she wouldn’t share
with their moms to a cross-country partner over Skype. Are these now enough
to get Microsoft’s attention?

Don’t be scared about this policy because of how it alters your today. Be
scared of it because of the clear line it traces between today and a future
in which we are openly fined credits for violations of the verbal morality
statute.

-- 
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+

 Harold F. Schiffman

Professor Emeritus of
 Dravidian Linguistics and Culture
Dept. of South Asia Studies
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305

Phone:  (215) 898-7475
Fax:  (215) 573-2138

Email:  haroldfs at gmail.com
http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~haroldfs/

-------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20180330/b3d8dd90/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list