<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1479" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><SPAN class=952461717-10012005>Hamo
said:</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><SPAN class=952461717-10012005></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT face=Arial><SPAN class=952461717-10012005>'</SPAN>The sentence,
"This entire notion is built on the erroneous premise that what is good for the
whole is good for all of the parts", should have read "This entire notion is
built on the erroneous premise that what is good for the whole is good for each
of its parts". <SPAN class=952461717-10012005>'</SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT face=Arial><SPAN
class=952461717-10012005></SPAN></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT face=Arial><SPAN class=952461717-10012005>Why? Both of
these sentences (all/each of) are acceptable and idiomatic in current writing
pratice. </SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT face=Arial><SPAN
class=952461717-10012005></SPAN></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT face=Arial><SPAN
class=952461717-10012005>Anthea</SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>* *
* * *<BR>Anthea Fraser Gupta
(Dr)<BR>School of English, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT
<www.leeds.ac.uk/english/staff/afg><BR>NB: Reply to
a.f.gupta@leeds.ac.uk<BR>* *
* * *<BR> </FONT>
</DIV></BODY></HTML>