<h1>BBC guidelines on offensive language</h1>
<h2 id="stand-first">The corporation's procedure on how to avoid causing offence through the use of foul language</h2>
<div id="content">
<ul class="article-attributes no-pic">
<li class="publication"><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/" name="&lid={contentTypeByline}{guardian.co.uk}&lpos={contentTypeByline}{1}"><font color="#005689">guardian.co.uk</font></a>, Friday November 28 2008 13.37 GMT </li>
<li class="history"><a class="historylink sendbyline" id="historylink-byline" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/nov/28/bbc-television1#history-byline"><font color="#005689">Article history</font></a></li></ul>
<div id="article-wrapper">
<p>"Offensive language is one of the most frequent causes of complaint. It can be a particular source of offence in sub-titles or online. Judgements about its use are difficult because they depend on tone and context. </p>
<p>"There is no consensus about words that are acceptable, when, and by whom. Different words cause different degrees of offence in different parts of the world. So a person's age, sex, education, employment, belief, nationality, and where they live, all impact on whether or not they might be offended.</p>
<p>"We do not include any offensive language in pre-school children's programmes or websites (four years and under). We must not include offensive language in programmes or websites made for younger children except in the most exceptional circumstances.</p>
<p>"We must not include offensive language before the watershed or on radio when children are particularly likely to be in our audience, or in online content likely to appeal to a high proportion of children, unless it is justified by the context and then its frequent use must be avoided.</p>
<p>"We must be able to justify the use of offensive language in challenging factual programmes, comedy and drama broadcast throughout the day on our speech radio stations. It will also generally require clear content information.</p>
<p>"We must not include the MOST offensive language before the watershed, or on radio when children are particularly likely to be in our audience, or in online content likely to appeal to a high proportion of children.</p>
<p>"We must make careful judgements about the use of the most offensive language post-watershed and ensure it is clearly signposted.</p>
<p>"Any proposal to use the most offensive language (cunt, motherfucker and fuck) must be referred to and approved by a senior editorial figure or for Independents by the commissioning editor and the relevant output controller for television, radio, online and any other service. Chief adviser editorial policy may also be consulted.</p>
<p>"Language that causes most offence includes:<br>• sexual swearwords<br>• terms of racist abuse<br>• terms of sexual and sexist abuse or abuse referring to sexuality<br>• pejorative terms relating to illness or disabilities<br>
• casual or derogatory use of holy names or religious words and especially in combination with other offensive language."</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/nov/28/bbc-television1">http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/nov/28/bbc-television1</a></p>
<p><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>**************************************<br>N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its members<br>and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or sponsor of<br>
the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who disagree with a <br>message are encouraged to post a rebuttal. (H. Schiffman, Moderator)<br>*******************************************<br></p></div></div>