<div dir="ltr"><div class="">
<h1 class="">
SC Takes Up Karnataka Case on Primary Education in Mother Tongue
</h1>
</div>
<div class="">
<p class="">
By
<span class="">Kanu Sarda - NEW DELHI</span>
</p>
<p class="">
<span class="">Published:</span> 13th February 2014 07:43 AM
</p>
<p class="">
<span class="">Last Updated:</span> 13th February 2014 07:43 AM
</p>
</div>
<div class="">
<div class="">
<p>The Supreme Court heard a batch of petitions to decide whether mother
tongue or regional language can be imposed by states as the medium of
instruction for primary school students.</p><p>A Constitution Bench
headed by Justice R M Lodha will also decide whether setting up an
authority to determine the mother tongue of a child seeking education in
schools is a restriction of fundamental rights or not.</p><p>The
Karnataka government’s 1994 Language Policy had made Kannada the medium
of instruction. Since then, there have been a series of cases between
private English-medium schools and the state government.</p><p><strong>HC Had Upheld Decision</strong></p><p>In 1993, a Supreme Court Bench of Chief Justice M N Venkatachalaiah and Justice S Mohan upheld the government’s decision.</p>
<p>In
2008, the Karnataka High Court struck down sections of the Language
Policy that made the mother tongue the mandatory medium of instruction,
ruling that parents were free to get their children educated in any
language of their choice.</p><p>The Karnataka government challenged before the Supreme Court the High Court’s decision to strike down the clauses. </p><p>A Division Bench of the Supreme Court referred the matter to a larger bench last year.</p>
<p>Advocate
General Ravi Varma Kumar, who appeared for the Karnataka government,
stressed that the state had the Constitutional obligation to provide
instructions to people in way of regulation.</p><p>Citing various
provisions, Kumar told the Bench how important it was to protect
minority rights and institutions. “Primary school language should be
one’s mother tongue and not English, for, English is an alien language,”
he said.</p><p>“The state has the power to regulate and the right to
oppose restrictions is the right of the state,” Kumar said, while
concluding his arguments.</p><p>The Bench will on Thursday hear the
managements of various schools who opposed the state’s decision to
include mother tongue in schools.</p>
</div>
<a href="http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/karnataka/SC-Takes-Up-Karnataka-Case-on-Primary-Education-in-Mother-Tongue/2014/02/13/article2053877.ece#.UvzyS4WePe0">http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/karnataka/SC-Takes-Up-Karnataka-Case-on-Primary-Education-in-Mother-Tongue/2014/02/13/article2053877.ece#.UvzyS4WePe0</a><br>
</div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>**************************************<br>N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its members<br>and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write directly to the original sender of any offensive message. A copy of this may be forwarded to this list as well. (H. Schiffman, Moderator)<br>
<br>For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to <a href="https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/">https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/</a><br>listinfo/lgpolicy-list<br>*******************************************
</div>