<div dir="ltr"><div class="">
<h2>Language Policy Stellenbosch: Fail</h2>
<span id="spnDate" class="">04 September 2015, 13:08</span>
<div class="" style="float:left;width:470px;margin-bottom:10px">
</div>
</div>
<h4>There is simply no way of looking at
Stellenbosch University’s language policy without coming to the
conclusion that it is deliberately excluding non-white South Africans
from seeking an education there. By insisting that the university keeps
educating in Afrikaans, you are insisting on its whiteness. I am an alum
of SU. I am also white and Afrikaans. I have delighted in sharing my
long and established history with Stellenbosch since the day I graduated
in 2012. I spent nine years in that town with a familial legacy that
stretches much further beyond that.</h4><p>The <strong>#OpenStellenbosch</strong> movement obtained critical mass over the past week. My history there means that mysocial
media feeds have been vibrating with thinly-veiled racist opinions –
posted in English – about the validity of the movement’s claims. What I
have come to understand from these posts is this: we don’t want you
here. </p><p>1) Stellenbosch University currently employs a
T-Language Policy. It has been controversial since its inception. The
reason that everyone has a hot take on it: it does not work. Lecturers
spend an unreasonable amount of time flip-flopping between English and
Afrikaans, with so much being lost in between. It doesn’t help to
promote Afrikaans and it certainly does not help the academic
experience.</p><h3>2) Afrikaans is not, and will never be, recognized as an international academic language. </h3><p>
To pretend otherwise is foolish. Any university, and especially
those who view themselves as exceptional, should put the communication
of knowledge via critical thought as its absolute highest priority.</p><p>3)
Educating the masses is incredibly difficult and right now South Africa
is failing. To demand that a teenager seeking an education should learn
another language to do so is cruel and unnecessary. </p><p>4) The
argument that is most popularly used is that ‘they can go somewhere
else’. Ignoring the wildly racist othering of such rhetoric, this
conveniently ignores what those of us who were lucky enough to attend SU
implicitly understand: Stellenbosch is special. It is unmatched by
anything else. If the privilege of attending is conditional on being
fluent in Afrikaans, admittance is conditional on being white. Or at the
very least, conditional on being the kind of non-white who doesn’t make
swathes of the student body uncomfortable.</p><p>Stellenbosch is a
special place. Its natural beauty is unparalleled. The cultural and
academic opportunities that it affords its students are unmatched. Are
we really going to convince ourselves that those virtues are afforded
simply by the grace of overwhelming whiteness? Surely, we cannot support
those who underestimate Stellenbosch so offensively. Are we really that
committed to pretending we don’t live in Africa?</p><p>Stellenbosch
University Management has two options: continue pretending that the
T-Option works and that claims of racism are ‘unique’. This would break
my heart and prove the university is stagnant in its insistence of
protecting the feelings of deceased Afrikaans men and the comfort zone
of their privileged youth. </p><p>The other option is to make English
the primary language of instruction and transform the university into
the benchmark of comprehensive and inclusive African tertiary education.
To help foster and nurture an environment where we can come to find the
Tolstoy of the Zulu’s or the Twain of the IsiXhosa’s. </p><p><br></p><p>What a magical thought.</p><p><a href="http://www.news24.com/MyNews24/Language-Policy-Stellenbosch-Fail-20150904">http://www.news24.com/MyNews24/Language-Policy-Stellenbosch-Fail-20150904</a><br></p><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">**************************************<br>N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its members<br>and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write directly to the original sender of any offensive message. A copy of this may be forwarded to this list as well. (H. Schiffman, Moderator)<br><br>For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to <a href="https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/" target="_blank">https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/</a><br>listinfo/lgpolicy-list<br>*******************************************</div>
</div>