<div dir="ltr"><h1 id="hd" class="">Sahitya Sabha rejects BSS policy</h1>
A STAFF REPORTER
<div style="text-align:center">
<div class="">
<img alt="" src="http://www.telegraphindia.com/1160128/images/28regmen.jpg" width="494">
<p class="">Asam Sahitya Sabha president Dhruba Jyoti Borah in Guwahati on Wednesday. Picture by UB Photos</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><strong>Guwahati, Jan. 27:</strong> Asam Sahitya Sabha today rejected
Bodo Sahitya Sabha's language policy that proposed Assamese as the
third language in the BTAD.</p>
<p>The BSS, in its recent 55th annual conference held in lower Assam's
Chirang district, announced its language policy proposing Bodo as the
main language in the BTAD, English second and Hindi and Assamese as
third languages. On January 22, the policy was endorsed by a delegate
meeting of the BSS.</p>
<p>"We reject the language policy of the Bodo Sahitya Sabha. The policy
violates the Assam Official Language Act, 1960, which was an outcome of
an agitation where people lost their lives and many got displaced," said
Sabha president Dhruba Jyoti Borah while addressing the media here this
afternoon.</p><div id="inarticle_wrapper_div"><div id="inread1_26817" style="display:inline-block;overflow:hidden;clear:both;width:494px"><div id="inread_26817" style="height:1px;overflow:hidden"><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr id="zd_tr_26817"><td style="" id="zd_td_26817"></td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></div>
<p>"Under no circumstances can we accept Assamese as the third language
in any area of the Brahmaputra Valley where the Assamese language and
culture is deeply rooted. It would have been different had the area been
Barak valley or the hill districts," said Borah.</p>
<p>The Sabha, he said, respects every community taking education in the
mother tongue. "We want Bodo to be the first language in the BTAD,
Assamese as second and English the third, while students should also be
taught practical Hindi," he said.</p>
<p>Borah said the Sabha since its inception has been responsible towards
Assamese and other regional languages of the state. He said the Sabha
has played a crucial role in the growth and development of the regional
languages. "Everyone knows how Asam Sahitya Sabha and those associated
with it have done for development of the regional languages. We are
committed to development of all regional languages. May be because of
some limitations we are unable to do as much as it was needed," he said.</p>
<p>Borah said it was only the Sabha that has been saying that Bodo
should be the associate official language in Assam. "But I have observed
that since the new executive of the Sabha took its charge, the BSS has
always been uncooperative. It refuses to talk things over despite
receiving letters from us," he said.</p>
<p>There has been an open war between the two sabhas. In the recent
session, the BSS did not invite officials of the Sabha citing
differences of opinion. When the BSS's language policy became public, it
drew criticism from different quarters.</p>
<p>Borah today said the policy may create a rift among different communities in the state.</p>
<p>He said the BSS's policy may also be a result of an "international
conspiracy" related to religious conversion. "Earlier Christian
missionaries used the mother tongue of a community to reach out to it.
That is why when they came to Assam they translated the Bible into
Assamese. But their policy changed afterwards. Now they do not encourage
mother tongue. They encourage English. May be the influence of this has
fallen on the Bodo community," said Borah.</p>
<p>He said the Assamese are liberal, so whichever community migrated to the state has accepted Assamese as its mother tongue.</p>
<p>"We will not sit idle. We will send letters to the Centre and the
state government regarding the language policy of the BSS and, if
required, knock on the door of the court," said Borah</p><p><a href="http://www.telegraphindia.com/1160128/jsp/northeast/story_66162.jsp#.Vqo8JVm92-c">http://www.telegraphindia.com/1160128/jsp/northeast/story_66162.jsp#.Vqo8JVm92-c</a><br></p><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">**************************************<br>N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its members<br>and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write directly to the original sender of any offensive message. A copy of this may be forwarded to this list as well. (H. Schiffman, Moderator)<br><br>For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to <a href="https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/" target="_blank">https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/</a><br>listinfo/lgpolicy-list<br>*******************************************</div>
</div>