<div dir="ltr"><h1 class="" style="line-height:34px">[Park Sang-seek] English as second official language in Korea</h1>
<div class="">
<div id="NaverMyNewsID" style="float:left"><img src="http://res.heraldm.com/new_201209/kh_newsstand_banner.png" usemap="#NaverMyNews1"></div>
<map name="NaverMyNews1">
<area shape="rect" coords="0,9,254,38" alt="kh" title="kh" href="http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20130221000957">
<area shape="rect" coords="245,0,256,8" alt="close" title="close">
</map>
<p class="">
</p>
<p class="">
Published : 2016-06-20 16:26<br>
Updated : 2016-06-20 17:15 </p>
</div>
<div id="articleText" class="" itemprop="articleBody">
<img style="margin-bottom: 10px; height: 132px; width: 245px; margin-left: 10px; margin-top: 10px;" alt="" src="http://res.heraldm.com/content/image/2016/06/20/20160620001422_0.jpg" align="right" border="0" height="171" width="301">There
are 67 sovereign states which recognize English as their official
language. Among the 67 states, 36 countries use English as the only
official language, while 31 countries recognize English as one of the
official languages.<br><br>Those countries recognizing English as the
only official language are either the countries whose majority of the
people are English-speaking ethnic groups or are former colonies of the
U.K. and are populated by one dominant language group or equally
numerous language groups. Those countries recognizing English and one or
more native tongues as official languages are those countries that were
colonized by more than one Western state and are populated by one
dominant native language group or more equally numerous native language
groups.<br><br>In the contemporary world, English has become a national
and global lingua franca. It is used as the oral and written means of
communication in most international governmental and nongovernmental
organizations; international business transactions; academic and
research institutions; and cultural, sports and entertainment activities
and forums.<br><br>On the eve of the new millennium, I wrote an article
titled “21st Century Resolution: Open Nationalism” in a local English
newspaper. In the article, I proposed that English should be considered
as second official language of Korea. But this idea has not been
discussed in any public forum. <br><br>My proposal is not to replace
Korean as an official language but to recognize English as second
official language, while keeping Korean as the primary official
language. Korea has an urgent need for English as second official
language. Fortunately, Korea has advantages over other non-Western
countries because most former Western colonies are faced with great
difficulties in adopting English as an official language mainly because
they are multi-ethnic countries and different ethnic groups will not
tolerate any other native or foreign language as an official language.<br><br>The
Korean people are a homogenous ethnic group and in possession of one of
the best languages in the world. South Korea is now an economically
developed country and is willing to accept Western civilization. In
these two respects, Korea has not been able to overcome the dilemma
created by modernization and Western civilization. Korea has been making
all-out efforts to catch up with Western developed countries but has
not been successfully competing with them on equal terms. The language
is one of the barriers. On the other hand, Korea has been accommodating
the Western way of life without anticipating the conflict between the
Western and Korean ways of life. Koreans have eagerly and gluttonously
accepted the materialistic aspects of the Western way of life but have
ignorantly rejected or misinterpreted essential Western values such as
individualism, rationalism and the rule of law. As a result, their
communalistic way of life has turned into a highly selfish and greedy
one, while keeping intact their traditional values such as
authoritarianism and irrationality. <br><br>If all Koreans become
proficient in English, they will be fully able to understand the true
meaning of Western values. As far as Korea is concerned, the debate on
whether non-Western states should or can pursue complete Westernization,
partial Westernization, homogenization or coexistence is no longer a
realistic one. The question is how fast it can accommodate Western
values. Western civilization is the most powerful moving force for
modernization and is becoming a universal civilization.<br><br>From a
practical and short-term perspective, Korea would benefit greatly by
adopting English as second official language. First, all government
officials could learn more, better and more quickly about their
counterparts in the international arena. They would also have a better
chance of playing a leading role at international conventions and
organizations and to enhance not only the prestige of Korea but also its
influence on important international issues. The Koreans who are fluent
in English would have better opportunities to be employed by
international governmental and nongovernmental organizations and could
contribute more to world peace and development. On the other hand,
Korean NGOs could be internationalized. <br><br>Second, Korean business
organizations could get more involved in joint programs and activities
with their foreign counterparts. It would also be easier for them to
gain new knowledge and information more easily as well as play a leading
role in any capacity. <br><br>All foreign business organizations
operating in Korea, whether they are from English-speaking countries or
not, would also benefit from Korea’s two official languages policy. The
same would be true of international governmental and non-governmental
organizations operating in Korea. <br><br>Third, Korean academic, arts
and sports organizations could more actively participate in their
respective international conferences and activities. In particular, the
Korean sightseeing business will greatly benefit from this dual official
language policy. Finally, Korean educational institutions would benefit
greatly. It could produce more competent and internationalized students
and attract more foreign students and scholars. Most importantly, the
educational gap between students from rich and poor families would be
greatly reduced because all students would learn both the dual language
and non-language courses at all levels of schools.<br><br>There are two
objections to this dual official language policy. One is that the dual
language policy is likely to make people less nationalistic and more
sycophantic toward Western countries and peoples and ultimately lose
their national identity. This criticism is a serious one. But as long as
Koreans place more importance on the Korean language than any foreign
language and maintain their ethnic homogeneity, it will not weaken the
Korean national identity. The next important question is how it should
be implemented. I suggest the following:<br><br>First, government,
business, arts, academic and research organizations can start the dual
language policy sequentially rather than simultaneously.<br><br>Second,
the starting grade of teaching both Korean and English can be the first
grade of elementary schools. On the other hand, the secondary and
tertiary educational institutions could offer some non-language courses
in both Korean and English, and students would allowed to choose them.
However, no public educational institutions should offer non-language
courses only in English unless it is necessary due to the nature of the
specific courses.<br><br>If Korea accelerates the civilization of Korean
society through a dual language policy, it will be able to civilize its
society faster than Japan or Singapore. By doing so, Korea will become
the first non-Western advanced state (a democratized, developed and
civilized state).<br><br>By Park Sang-seek<br><br>Park Sang-seek is a
former rector of the Graduate Institute of Peace Studies, Kyung Hee
University, and the author of “Globalized Korea and Localized Globe.”
--Ed.<br><br></div><a href="http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20160620000937">http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20160620000937</a><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">**************************************<br>N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its members<br>and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write directly to the original sender of any offensive message. A copy of this may be forwarded to this list as well. (H. Schiffman, Moderator)<br><br>For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to <a href="https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/" target="_blank">https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/</a><br>listinfo/lgpolicy-list<br>*******************************************</div>
</div>