<div dir="ltr"><h1 id="gmail-headline" class="gmail-headline" style="visibility: visible;">Move Over, Wikipedia. Dictionaries Are Hot Again.</h1>
                                                        <div id="gmail-story-meta-footer" class="gmail-story-meta-footer">
                <div class="extended-byline gmail-no-thumb">
    <p class="gmail-byline-column">
                <a class="gmail-byline-column-link" href="https://www.nytimes.com/column/water-cooler">Water Cooler</a>            </p>
    <p class="gmail-byline">By                     <span>
                                    <span class="gmail-byline-author">KATHERINE ROSMAN</span>
                            </span>
                <time class="gmail-dateline" datetime="2017-02-11T11:02:18-05:00">FEB. 11, 2017</time>
    </p>
</div>
                                                
                                    
                            </div>
        
    

    

        
    <div class="gmail-story-body-supplemental">
    <div class="gmail-story-body gmail-story-body-1">
        <figure id="gmail-media-100000004922922" class="gmail-media gmail-photo gmail-lede gmail-layout-large-horizontal">
    <br>
    <div class="gmail-image">
            <img src="https://static01.nyt.com/images/2017/02/12/fashion/12WATERCOOLER/12WATERCOOLER-master768.jpg" alt="" class="gmail-media-viewer-candidate"><div class="gmail-media-action-overlay">

</div>
            
            
    </div>
        <figcaption class="gmail-caption">
                        <span class="gmail-credit">
            <span class="gmail-visually-hidden">Credit</span>
            Ron Barrett        </span>
            </figcaption>
    </figure>
<p class="gmail-story-body-text gmail-story-content">In the hours after Senator Elizabeth Warren, Democrat of Massachusetts, was <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/us/politics/elizabeth-warren-coretta-scott-king.html?_r=0">silenced</a>
 by her Republican colleagues for “impugning” a fellow senator by 
reading aloud a letter Coretta Scott King had written that was critical 
of Jeff Sessions, Republican of Alabama (later confirmed as attorney 
general), thousands of Americans did what they always do: They tapped 
away at their phones.</p><p class="gmail-story-body-text gmail-story-content">But
 they weren’t checking text messages or liking a photo on Facebook. They
 were thumbing through online dictionaries, looking for a definition of 
“impugn.” On Wednesday morning, the dictionary publisher Merriam-Webster
 <a href="https://www.merriam-webster.com/news-trend-watch/elizabeth-warren-said-to-impugn-jeff-sessions-20170208">posted on its website</a> that searches on the word had surged.</p><p class="gmail-story-body-text gmail-story-content">“It’s been at the top for almost 12 hours now,” said Peter Sokolowski, the company’s editor at large.</p><p class="gmail-story-body-text gmail-story-content">As
 he wrote on the Merriam-Webster website: “Impugn means ‘to oppose or 
attack as false or lacking integrity’ or ‘to criticize (a person’s 
character, intentions, etc.) by suggesting that someone is not honest 
and should not be trusted.’ It comes from the Latin word pugnare meaning
 ‘to fight,’ which is also the root of <a href="https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pugnacious">pugnacious</a> and <a href="https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pugilism">pugilism</a>.”</p>        <a class="gmail-visually-hidden gmail-skip-to-text-link" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/11/fashion/merriam-webster-dictionary-social-media-politics.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=wide-thumb&module=mini-moth&region=top-stories-below&WT.nav=top-stories-below&_r=0#story-continues-1">Continue reading the main story</a>
    </div>
    <div class="gmail-supplemental gmail-first gmail-short" id="gmail-supplemental-1">
    </div>
</div>
<div class="gmail-story-interrupter" id="gmail-story-continues-1">
    <div id="gmail-FlexAd" class="gmail-ad gmail-flex-ad gmail-nocontent gmail-robots-nocontent">
    <div class="gmail-accessibility-ad-header gmail-visually-hidden">
    <p>Advertisement</p>
</div>
<a class="gmail-visually-hidden gmail-skip-to-text-link" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/11/fashion/merriam-webster-dictionary-social-media-politics.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=wide-thumb&module=mini-moth&region=top-stories-below&WT.nav=top-stories-below&_r=0#story-continues-2">Continue reading the main story</a>
    
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail-story-body-supplemental">
    <div class="gmail-story-body gmail-story-body-2">
        <p class="gmail-story-body-text gmail-story-content" id="gmail-story-continues-2">A <a href="https://twitter.com/MerriamWebster/status/829323277894111232">tweet</a> posted to the dictionary’s feed linking to this definition quickly racked up several hundred retweets.</p><figure class="gmail-media gmail-twitter embedded gmail-layout-horizontal-inset">
        
    
</figure>
<p class="gmail-story-body-text gmail-story-content">At
 a time when many are questioning the definition of common words they 
thought they understood, after years of the English language being 
degraded by text messages and hashtags, dictionaries have made a 
surprising comeback in the United States.</p><p class="gmail-story-body-text gmail-story-content">On
 dictionary apps and websites, “lookups” (which, according to 
Merriam-Webster, is one word) of words or phrases related to news events
 have <a href="http://www.dictionary.com/browse/precipitous">precipitously</a> increased. <a href="https://www.merriam-webster.com/word-of-the-day/barbican-2017-01-26">Bibliophiles</a> are becoming social media stars. Sales of print dictionaries remain brisk and are a profit center for some publishers.</p>
<p class="gmail-story-body-text gmail-story-content" id="gmail-story-continues-3">“Dictionaries are not regarded as sexy or interesting, but what dictionaries are known for is telling the truth,” said <a href="http://www.jessesword.com/">Jesse Sheidlower</a>,
 a lexicographer and past president of the American Dialect Society. 
“Right now there are a lot of questions about what is true. We want 
clear statements about what things are, and dictionaries provide that.”</p><p class="gmail-story-body-text gmail-story-content">The
 most commonly used dictionaries, whether in print or digital, reflect 
what is known as “descriptive lexicography,” meaning that editors study 
the way people use words and determine their meaning based on that 
evidence.</p><p class="gmail-story-body-text gmail-story-content">Social
 media has been revolutionary in changing the access lexicographers have
 to the evolution of how words are used. Yet the process of evaluating 
evidence and writing definitions in a clear and unbiased manner remains 
the objective, said Katherine Connor Martin, head of American 
dictionaries at Oxford University Press.</p><p class="gmail-story-body-text gmail-story-content">The
 aim is to provide the most accurate information about where a word 
comes from, how it is used grammatically and what meaning it conveys. 
“Our goal is really simple,” she said, “and it contributes to a sense of
 authoritativeness.”</p><p class="gmail-story-body-text gmail-story-content">But
 some dictionary companies are embracing the personality-driven culture 
of the digital age to make lexicography more accessible and perhaps 
drive advertising revenue through clicks. Merriam-Webster and 
Dictionary.com use Twitter and other networks to share “word of the day”
 features, real-time data about words that are suddenly being searched 
by large numbers of people and cheeky observations on public figures and
 their use of language.</p><div class="gmail-newsletter-signup" id="gmail-newsletter-promo">
        <h2 class="gmail-headline">NYT Living Newsletter</h2>    <p class="gmail-summary">Get lifestyle news from the Style, Travel and Food sections, from the latest trends to news you can use.</p>    <form name="regilite" class="gmail-newsletter-form" method="post">
        <div class="gmail-control gmail-input-control">
            <div class="gmail-form-errors">
                
                
                
            </div>
            <div class="gmail-field-container">
                <input id="email" name="email" class="email-input" value="" type="email">
                </div></div></form></div></div></div><div class="gmail-newsletter-signup" id="gmail-newsletter-promo"><form name="regilite" class="gmail-newsletter-form" method="post">
        <div class="gmail-control gmail-checkbox-control">
            <div class="gmail-field-container">
                <input id="gmail-special-offers" class="gmail-checkbox" name="special-offers" value="MM" checked type="checkbox">
            </div>
            <div class="gmail-label-container">
                <label class="gmail-checkboxLabel" for="special-offers">Receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times's products and services.</label>
            </div>
        </div>
        
    </form>
    <div class="gmail-messages">
        
        
        
        
    </div>
    <ul class="gmail-footer"><li id="gmail-sample-newsletter-link" class="gmail-sample"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/pages/nytliving/nytliving-email/index.html?pgtype=subscriptionspage&version=new&contentId=LI&eventName=sample&module=newsletter-sign-up" target="_blank">See Sample</a></li><li class="gmail-manage-email"><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/mem/email.html" target="_blank">Manage Email Preferences</a></li><li class="gmail-privacy"><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/privacy" target="_blank">Privacy Policy</a></li></ul>
    
</div>
<p class="gmail-story-body-text gmail-story-content">Each
 company has been both criticized and heralded for using pointed words 
in social media to promote its definitions. For instance, in early 
February, <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/827483841589891073">President Trump posted on Twitter</a>,
 “Professional anarchists, thugs and paid protesters are proving the 
point of the millions of people who voted to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”</p><p class="gmail-story-body-text gmail-story-content">Later that day, the feed for <a href="https://twitter.com/Dictionarycom/status/827546284663795712">Dictionary.com posted</a>,
 “‘Professional anarchists’ falls into our new favorite category: 
Alternative facts!” It then shared a link to its definition of oxymoron:
 “A figure of speech by which a locution produces an incongruous, 
seemingly self-contradictory effect, as in ‘cruel kindness’ or ‘to make 
haste slowly.’”</p><p class="gmail-story-body-text gmail-story-content"><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/11/fashion/merriam-webster-dictionary-social-media-politics.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=wide-thumb&module=mini-moth&region=top-stories-below&WT.nav=top-stories-below&_r=0">https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/11/fashion/merriam-webster-dictionary-social-media-politics.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=wide-thumb&module=mini-moth&region=top-stories-below&WT.nav=top-stories-below&_r=0</a><br></p><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+<br><br> Harold F. Schiffman<br><br>Professor Emeritus of <br> Dravidian Linguistics and Culture <br>Dept. of South Asia Studies                     <br>University of Pennsylvania<br>Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305<br><br>Phone:  (215) 898-7475<br>Fax:  (215) 573-2138                                      <br><br>Email:  <a href="mailto:haroldfs@gmail.com" target="_blank">haroldfs@gmail.com</a><br><a href="http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/%7Eharoldfs/" target="_blank">http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~haroldfs/</a>    <br><br>-------------------------------------------------</div>
</div>