<div dir="ltr"><div id="gmail-post-page-title">
<h1>
New approach needed to help kids develop strong language skills </h1>
</div>
<div class="gmail-fb-social-plugin gmail-fb-like gmail-fb_iframe_widget"><span style="vertical-align:bottom;width:285px;height:24px"></span></div>
<p><span>Previously, we mentioned that
the Hong Kong government was seeking to nurture “bi-literate and
tri-lingual” citizens by immersing students in an English-rich
environment in school settings.</span></p>
<p>Such route can be described as a “late immersion” approach.</p>
<p>For instance, English-capable primary school graduates would be
allocated to secondary schools using English as the medium of
instruction (EMI).</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Mandarin is a required subject from the start of junior
primary (Primary 1) until the end of junior secondary (Form 3).</p>
<p>However, as for preschool education, the Education Bureau has yet to
issue any detailed official curriculum guidelines on both languages. As a
result, the quantity and quality of English and Mandarin inputs depend
on parents’ choices of nurseries and kindergartens.</p>
<p>In general, preschool English would start from ABC and simple
everyday words. Meanwhile, there has been a huge discrepancy in Mandarin
teaching, ranging from introducing no Mandarin to teaching it as a
regular school subject.</p>
<p>According to many results from studies from psycholinguistics and
neuroscience, there are internal and external factors affecting
individuals’ second language acquisition, among which age is an
indispensable factor.</p>
<p>Irrespective of acquisition of the mother tongue, second language or
foreign language, preschoolers aged between four and six and junior
primary pupils aged between six and eight are identified as better
languages learners than adults, as they are more able to readily pick up
and internalize what they have learned into their own language system.</p>
<p>In other words, the greater the age to enter the learning of second
or foreign language, the lower would be the learning effectiveness, it
has been noted.</p>
<p>The government’s promotion of “bi-literate and tri-lingual” has been
difficult since the bureau has left out the golden learning period:
preschool education.</p>
<p>It is the prime period for individuals’ brain development, whole
person development and language development. As mentioned, it is yet to
be a part of the standard curriculum. </p>
<p>That said, the government has been getting half the result with twice the effort.</p>
<p>In fact, individuals also suffer by this curriculum design of “late immersion”.</p>
<p>For most local university students who are native Cantonese speakers,
if their English foundation is weak, it is unlikely to do anything that
can possibly boost their level of proficiency profoundly within only
three or four years.</p>
<p>It is found that the acquisition and development of languages by
pupils aged between four and eight (from kindergarten and Key Stage 1)
is better than that of secondary and tertiary students.</p>
<p>In other words, when children aged between four and eight are subject
to quality language inputs, they are more likely to succeed as
competent speakers of English and Mandarin.</p>
<p>In conclusion, we would urge the Education Bureau to conduct a
comprehensive review on language policy for every key stage and
formulate policy with consideration beginning from pre-primary
education, instead of depending on “late immersion” approach.</p>
<p><em>Leung Wai-mun, Director of Chinese Language Center (CLC) and
Assistant Professor at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, is the
co-author of this article that appeared in the Hong Kong Economic
Journal on Feb. 10.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.ejinsight.com/20170217-new-approach-needed-to-help-kids-develop-strong-language-skills/">http://www.ejinsight.com/20170217-new-approach-needed-to-help-kids-develop-strong-language-skills/</a><br><em></em></p><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">**************************************<br>N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its members<br>and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write directly to the original sender of any offensive message. A copy of this may be forwarded to this list as well. (H. Schiffman, Moderator)<br><br>For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to <a href="https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/" target="_blank">https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/</a><br>listinfo/lgpolicy-list<br>*******************************************</div>
</div>