<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail-row">
  <div class="gmail-col-12">
    
    <h1 class="gmail-text-serif gmail-m-0">Q&A with Kristin Simpsen: English-only policies may discriminate, EEOC warns</h1>
  </div>
  <div class="gmail-col-md gmail-d-flex gmail-byline-wrap">
    
    
            <img class="gmail-mr-3 gmail-initial gmail-loading" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/content.newsok.com/newsok/staff/burkes.jpg" alt="Paula Burkes" height="45">
      

  <div class="gmail-w-100">
              <span class="gmail-text-serif gmail-font-italic">by</span>
                    <a href="https://newsok.com/more/Paula Burkes" class="gmail-text-uppercase gmail-text-primary gmail-h5">Paula Burkes</a>
              
    
    <div>
      <span class="gmail-">Published: <span class="gmail-text-muted">Wed, June  6, 2018  5:00 AM</span></span>
          </div>
  </div>


  </div>
  <div class="gmail-col-md gmail-share-wrap">
    
      




<div id="gmail-articleShare" class="gmail-z-4 gmail-bg-white">
  
  <div class="gmail-share-count gmail-d-inline-block gmail-text-serif">
    <div id="gmail-share-count-num">0</div>
    <div class="gmail-small">shares</div>
  </div>
  
  <a class="gmail-d-inline-block gmail-text-white gmail-bg-facebook gmail-share-facebook" rel="nofollow external">
    
  </a>
  
  <a class="gmail-d-inline-block gmail-text-white gmail-bg-twitter gmail-share-twitter" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnewsok.com%2Farticle%2F5597039%2Fqa-with-kristin-simpsen-english-only-policies-may-discriminate-eeoc-warns&text=Q%26A%20with%20Kristin%20Simpsen%3A%20English-only%20policies%20may%20discriminate%2C%20EEOC%20warns&via=newsok&related=theoklahoman,newsoksports">
    
  </a>
  
  <a class="gmail-d-inline-block gmail-text-white gmail-bg-pinterest gmail-share-pinterest" rel="nofollow external" target="_blank" href="https://pinterest.com/pin/create/button/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnewsok.com%2Farticle%2F5597039%2Fqa-with-kristin-simpsen-english-only-policies-may-discriminate-eeoc-warns&description=Q%26A%20with%20Kristin%20Simpsen%3A%20English-only%20policies%20may%20discriminate%2C%20EEOC%20warns&media=//cdn2.newsok.biz/cache/r960-095a7bd8867450ebdb7fca5356941458.jpg">
    
  </a>
  
  <a class="gmail-d-inline-block gmail-text-white gmail-bg-dark gmail-share-email" rel="nofollow external" href="mailto:?subject=Q%26A%20with%20Kristin%20Simpsen%3A%20English-only%20policies%20may%20discriminate%2C%20EEOC%20warns&body=https%3A%2F%2Fnewsok.com%2Farticle%2F5597039%2Fqa-with-kristin-simpsen-english-only-policies-may-discriminate-eeoc-warns">
    <span class="gmail-sr-only">email</span>
    
  </a>
  
  
    <a class="gmail-d-inline-block gmail-text-white gmail-bg-secondary gmail-share-comment gmail-position-relative gmail-comment-count-stack" href="https://newsok.com/article/5597039/qa-with-kristin-simpsen-english-only-policies-may-discriminate-eeoc-warns#comments">
    <span class="gmail-FBCommentsNum gmail-text-secondary gmail-font-weight-bold gmail-z-2 gmail-position-absolute gmail-lh-1">0</span>
    
  </a>
  </div>

  </div>
</div>



      <div class="gmail-article-gut gmail-text-serif">
        
  

  
  

  <figure>
  <span class="gmail-hmedia">
<img src="https://cdn2.newsok.biz/cache/lead630_blur-095a7bd8867450ebdb7fca5356941458.jpg" class="gmail-initial gmail-loading">  </span>
  <figcaption class="gmail-caption gmail-small gmail-text-muted gmail-mt-2"><p>Kristin Simpsen is a labor and employment attorney with McAfee & Taft.</p></figcaption>
</figure>

      </div>

      
      <div class="gmail-article-rail gmail-float-right" style="overflow:visible">
        <div class="gmail-advertisement gmail-bg-light gmail-border gmail-border-light">
          <div id="gmail-div-gpt-ad-article-rail-2" class="gmail-d-inline-block"><div id="gmail-google_ads_iframe_/5173/okp.newsok/article_1__container__" style="border:0pt none;display:inline-block;width:300px;height:250px"></div></div>

                                <div class="gmail-clearfix gmail-pt-3">
              <a href="https://newsok.com/store" class="gmail-btn gmail-btn-primary gmail-btn-sm gmail-float-right gmail-p-2 gmail-rounded-0 gmail-lh-1 gmail-ml-2 gmail-app-hide">GO PRO</a>
              Support local journalism by upgrading to NewsOK Pro.
            </div>
          
        </div>
      <div id="gmail-Liqwid_slot17" style="overflow:visible;margin:20px auto;width:300px"><div id="gmail-Liqwid_board17" style="top: 0px;"></div></div></div>
      

      
            <div class="gmail-article-gut gmail-text-serif">
                <p><strong>Q: A video recently went viral that showed a 
restaurant patron ranting about how he thought the Manhattan eatery's 
“staff should be speaking English,” not Spanish. Is there anything that 
prevents an employer from requiring its employees to speak English?</strong></p>
<p><strong>A:</strong> Interestingly, the Equal Employment Opportunity 
Commission (EEOC) recently filed suit in the Southern District of 
California alleging that Albertsons Companies Inc. violated federal law 
when it implemented a policy that prohibited Hispanic employees from 
speaking Spanish around non-Spanish speakers, including when they spoke 
to Spanish-speaking customers and during breaks. The EEOC also contends 
that the employer's managers publicly reprimanded Hispanic employees for
 speaking Spanish. Finally, the EEOC alleges that the employer acted 
improperly by failing to take corrective action after multiple employee 
complaints. In the lawsuit, the EEOC seeks injunctive relief aimed at 
preventing discrimination in the future. The EEOC also seeks back pay 
and compensation for non-pecuniary losses for a class of employees who 
were allegedly discriminated against by the implementation of this 
policy.</p>
<p><strong>Q: What is the EEOC's position on English-only language policies?</strong></p>
<p><strong>A:</strong> Title VII of the Civil Rights Act doesn't 
specifically prohibit English-only language policies. Nevertheless, the 
EEOC has taken the position that English-only language policies have the
 potential to discriminate on the basis of national origin, which would 
be a Title VII violation. The EEOC's guidance provides that a blanket 
requirement that employees speak only English is presumed to violate 
Title VII. Language-restrictive policies may be utilized “only to those 
specific employment situations for which they are needed to promote safe
 and efficient job performance or business operations.” The EEOC has 
stated that the following business necessities could justify an 
English-only policy: Communications with customers, co-workers, or 
supervisors who only speak English; in emergencies or other situations 
in which workers must speak a common language to promote safety; for 
cooperative work assignments in which the English-only rule is needed to
 promote efficiency; and to enable a supervisor who only speaks English 
to monitor the performance of an employee whose job duties require 
communication with co-workers or customers.</p>
                              

              </div>

      
                              <div class="gmail-article-gut gmail-text-serif">
                
<p><strong>Q: Can employers make employment decisions based on an employee's accent?</strong></p>
<p><strong>A:</strong> According to the EEOC, an employer only should 
make an employment decision based on an individual's accent if the 
person's accent “interferes materially with job performance.” To satisfy
 this standard, the EEOC states that the employer must show that 
effectively speaking English is required to perform the job duties, and 
that the individual's accent materially interferes with his or her 
ability to communicate in spoken English.</p>
<p><strong>Q: What does the EEOC's guidance mean for employers?</strong></p>
<p><strong>A:</strong> Employers may adopt and enforce an English-only 
policy as long as the policy was not put in place for the purpose of 
discriminating against employees on the basis of their race or national 
origin, and the policies were adopted to further a legitimate business 
interest of the employer. If an employer chooses to implement such a 
policy, the employer still should permit employees to speak their native
 language where English isn't required for legitimate business purposes,
 such as when the employee is on break. Importantly, employers must give
 sufficient notice of a restrictive language policy by informing 
employees about the new language policy and the consequences for 
violating it. Finally, it's important to remember that because the EEOC 
strongly disfavors English-only policies, the policy will be 
aggressively scrutinized if challenged.</p></div>

<br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+<br><br> Harold F. Schiffman<br><br>Professor Emeritus of <br> Dravidian Linguistics and Culture <br>Dept. of South Asia Studies                     <br>University of Pennsylvania<br>Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305<br><br>Phone:  (215) 898-7475<br>Fax:  (215) 573-2138                                      <br><br>Email:  <a href="mailto:haroldfs@gmail.com" target="_blank">haroldfs@gmail.com</a><br><a href="http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~haroldfs/" target="_blank">http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~haroldfs/</a>    <br><br>-------------------------------------------------</div>
</div>