Reviews on Ling Anthro in the US?

[Laura Ahearn]

Thanks for the correction, Steve.  I never did learn to type numbers without looking…

Laura

*****************************
Laura M. Ahearn
Series Editor, Oxford Studies in the Anthropology of Language
Associate Professor
Department of Anthropology
Rutgers University
131 George Street
New Brunswick, NJ 08901
(908) 227-7198
http://www.anthro.rutgers.edu/fac/department-undergrad-a-grad-faculty/laura-ahearn

Living Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781444340563




On Feb 22, 2013, at 8:21 PM, Steve Bialostok <stevebialostok at yahoo.com> wrote:

> That's 44: 3. Only because I've assigned it in the past. Steve
> 
> From: Laura Ahearn <ahearn at RCI.RUTGERS.EDU>
> To: LINGANTH at LISTSERV.LINGUISTLIST.ORG 
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 10:13 AM
> Subject: Re: Reviews on Ling Anthro in the US?
> 
> Nate,
> 
> You might take a look at Duranti's "Language as Culture in US Anthropology: Three Paradigms," Current Anthropology 33:323-347.
> 
> Laura
> 
> *****************************
> Laura M. Ahearn
> Series Editor, Oxford Studies in the Anthropology of Language
> Associate Professor
> Department of Anthropology
> Rutgers University
> 131 George Street
> New Brunswick, NJ 08901
> (908) 227-7198
> http://www.anthro.rutgers.edu/fac/department-undergrad-a-grad-faculty/laura-ahearn
> 
> Living Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology
> http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781444340563
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Feb 22, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Nathaniel Dumas <ndumas at LINGUISTICS.UCSB.EDU> wrote:
> 
> > Dear Colleagues,
> > 
> > I hope all is well. I'm currently designing a course on the anthropologies of the US, with the goal of incorporating ethnographies from both linguistic and cultural anthropology. It's less of a course about "what it means to be 'American'" and more of a course on how do different conceptualizations of the US in anthropology push us to rethink the multiple projects, concepts, and methods of the discipline. I've noticed that while there is much written about this from cultural anthropologists (including a 2010 Annual Review "Anthropologies of the US"), I've come up against a wall in my search for reviews on the problems and rewards for linguistic anthropologies of the US, even though many of us do conduct fieldwork in the US. That said, does anyone know of any review pieces that cover how contemporary linguistic anthropologies of the US in general have contributed to a rethinking of the discipline's epistemological, methodological, and areal foundations? (The only other one that comes to mind is Norma Mendoza Denton's 1999 ARA article, which focuses on US Latinos.)
> > 
> > Thanks in advance!
> > 
> > Best,
> > Nate
> > 
> > Nathaniel Dumas
> > Visiting Postdoctoral Researcher
> > Department of Linguistics
> > University of California, Santa Barbara
> > http://ucsb.academia.edu/NathanielDumas/About
> 
>