<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
The irony of it is that I had scheduled this talk for Linguistics Club back in September or October. Serendipity!<br>
<br>
Judy<br>
<br>
Sent using OWA for iPad
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Linganth <linganth-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org> on behalf of Stephanie Feyne <stefeyne@gmail.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, February 7, 2015 2:23:01 PM<br>
<b>Cc:</b> LINGANTH@listserv.linguistlist.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Linganth] It turns out that Jane Hill is white(!)</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Isn't this great timing - was listed on Google News in the top hits tfor linguistics:</div>
<div> </div>
<div><span>Western professor offers insight into linguistic racism:</span></div>
<div><span></span> </div>
<div>Western Washington University anthropology professor Judy Pine presented her linguistic perspective on racism in a crash course discussion at the university’s Linguistics Club, Tuesday, Feb. 3.</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="http://www.westernfrontonline.net/news/article_57c9d0c2-ad03-11e4-b63f-070060521797.html"><font color="#0066cc">http://www.westernfrontonline.net/news/article_57c9d0c2-ad03-11e4-b63f-070060521797.html</font></a></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Stephanie Feyne</div>
<div>NYC</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 5:00 AM, William Leap <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:wlm@american.edu" target="_blank">wlm@american.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<font face="sans-serif">Mark, "theory" doesnt "....try to differentiate its language from everyday terms... " It is people that do that. And that question of agency and responsibility -- may be the central to the discussion here. .
</font><br>
<br>
<font face="sans-serif">We have been struggling with this issue for some years at the Lavender Languages conference. how to talk about sexual transgression and sexual "difference" [different from what ? ] without falling deeply into an esoteric vocabulary
that few understand and fewer value. . Conversations with the media about queer linguistics -- try it ! </font>
<br>
<br>
<font face="sans-serif">Hegemonies of whiteness and related issues are on the program.,
</font><br>
<br>
<font face="sans-serif">Join us next week (Feb 13-15, 2015) , </font><a href="http://www.american.edu/cas/anthropology/lavender-languages" target="_blank"><font face="sans-serif">www.american.edu/cas/anthropology/lavender-languages</font></a><font face="sans-serif">
</font> <br>
<br>
<font face="sans-serif">Wlm L. Leap<br>
Professor, Department of Anthropology, American University, Washington DC 20016</font>
<br>
<font face="sans-serif">Co-editor, Journal of Language and Sexuality </font><a href="http://www.benjamins.com/#catalog/journals/jls" target="_blank"><font face="sans-serif">http://www.benjamins.com/#catalog/journals/jls</font></a><font face="sans-serif"><br>
<br>
"It is not very hard to silence us, but that is not because we cannot speak." -- a Bengali villager once remarked to Nobel prize winning economist Amartya Sen (The Argumentative Indian, Picador Books, 2005: xiii)
</font><br>
<br>
<font face="sans-serif">"Don't be a drag, just be a queen." Lady Gaga <br>
</font><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<font color="#5f5f5f" size="1" face="sans-serif">From: </font><font size="1" face="sans-serif">"Peterson, Mark" <<a href="mailto:petersm2@miamioh.edu" target="_blank">petersm2@miamioh.edu</a>></font>
<br>
<font color="#5f5f5f" size="1" face="sans-serif">To: </font><font size="1" face="sans-serif">Frank Bechter <<a href="mailto:fbechter@gmail.com" target="_blank">fbechter@gmail.com</a>>,
</font><br>
<font color="#5f5f5f" size="1" face="sans-serif">Cc: </font><font size="1" face="sans-serif">"Linguistic Anthropology Discussion Group \(<a href="mailto:LINGANTH@listserv.linguistlist.org" target="_blank">LINGANTH@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>\)" <<a href="mailto:LINGANTH@listserv.linguistlist.org" target="_blank">LINGANTH@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>></font>
<br>
<font color="#5f5f5f" size="1" face="sans-serif">Date: </font><font size="1" face="sans-serif">02/06/2015 10:31 PM</font>
<br>
<span><font color="#5f5f5f" size="1" face="sans-serif">Subject: </font><font size="1" face="sans-serif">Re: [Linganth] It turns out that Jane Hill is white(!)</font>
<br>
</span><font color="#5f5f5f" size="1" face="sans-serif">Sent by: </font><font size="1" face="sans-serif">"Linganth" <<a href="mailto:linganth-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org" target="_blank">linganth-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>></font>
<br>
<hr noshade="">
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
<font size="4" face="Roman">That's true Frank, but it is also strategic. Critical theory often tries to differentiate its language from everyday terms because those terms are weighted by their associations with positions the scholars are trying to critique.
This kind of alienating vocabulary is common in any science where specialized vocabularies emerge. But when media coverage of physics or chemistry occurs, the media producers generally seek to translate the concepts for their audiences. Here, they were deliberately
making use of Malinowski's "coefficient of weirdness" to make the discourse alienating.</font>
<br>
<br>
<font size="4" face="Roman">Mark Allen Peterson<br>
Professor and Chair, Department of Anthropology<br>
& Professor, International Studies Program<br>
120 Upham Hall<br>
Miami University<br>
Oxford, OH 45056<br>
<a href="tel:513%20529-5018" target="_blank" value="+15135295018">513 529-5018</a><br>
petersm2@miamiOH.edu</font><font color="blue" size="4" face="Roman"><u><br>
</u></font><a href="http://www.connectedincairo.com/" target="_blank"><font color="blue" size="4" face="Roman"><u>www.connectedincairo.com</u></font></a>
<br>
<br>
<font size="3">On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Frank Bechter <</font><a href="mailto:fbechter@gmail.com" target="_blank"><font color="blue" size="3"><u>fbechter@gmail.com</u></font></a><font size="3">> wrote:</font>
<br>
<font size="3">Critical scholars, take a critical look at your own discursive practices. If the question is how to get the helpful message across, be willing to see your own bad chess moves. We see in this piece, </font><a href="http://jezebel.com/watch-these-two-white-ladies-freak-out-about-asus-white-1681368338" target="_blank"><font color="blue" size="3"><u>http://jezebel.com/watch-these-two-white-ladies-freak-out-about-asus-white-1681368338</u></font></a><font size="3">,
that Fox leads with a string of specific words -- indeed, a string of specific *types* of words -- found in the *course description* of the disputed course, U.S. Race Theory and the Problem of Whiteness: "... postcolonialist, psychoanalytic, deconstructionist,
feminist, new historicist." The anchor omits the lead phrase, "Major critical schools of recent decades," so as to make the wash of hyper-intellectual terms as incoherent as possible. They are as alienating as possible, thus allowing any construal of "whiteness"
or "problem" to fly. One cannot stop Fox and misguided students from selectively omitting phrases, but one should wonder whether the string of words that Fox did latch onto for its own purposes are actually helpful in any other way, i.e., in the goal of greater
critical awareness in the world at large, or especially in a course description. If your goal is to equip students with tools to fight institutional racism and disenfranchisement, these terms are not helpful. They are not tools. To the contrary, they -- especially
when you rattle them off all in a row -- are the very discursive forms which can ensure, in the minds of many readers, your complete irrelevance and hauteur. To me, they ensure that you probably don't know what you're talking about. If critical scholarship
is to be useful in the world (which, of course, need not be its function), then hit hard in your advertisements of it, explain any big term you use, or simply don't use it. Realize what you're up against. If a wash of such terms actually attracts select students
and colleagues who are content to have this discourse remain provincial, consider how many more you will attract with terms that are designed to arrest a much bigger audience, which hopefully is the real goal.</font>
<br>
<br>
<font size="3">Frank Bechter</font> <br>
<font size="3">Charlottesville, VA</font> <br>
<br>
<font size="3">On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Matthew Bernius <</font><a href="mailto:mbernius@gmail.com" target="_blank"><font color="blue" size="3"><u>mbernius@gmail.com</u></font></a><font size="3">> wrote:</font>
<br>
<font size="3">On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Peterson, Mark <</font><a href="mailto:petersm2@miamioh.edu" target="_blank"><font color="blue" size="3"><u>petersm2@miamioh.edu</u></font></a><font size="3">> wrote:</font>
<br>
<font size="3">What we think of as "objective" journalism evolved in a particular historical and economic context. Before that, it was not at all uncommon to have the Republican and Democratic newspapers in the same city, each sniping at different targets the
other supported.</font> <br>
<font size="3"><br>
And to that point, when one looks at the entire history of American Journalism, the "objective period" (which I'd argue we are approaching the end of) is more of a historical anachronism rather than the norm. To Mark's point, the reality is that the Fox News
approach is, in many respects, closer to the traditional form of the press.<br>
<br>
Great discussion all,</font> <br>
<br>
<font size="3">- Matt</font> <br>
<br>
<font size="3">-----------------------------<br>
Matthew Bernius<br>
mBernius@gMail.com | </font><a href="http://www.mattbernius.com/" target="_blank"><font color="blue" size="3"><u>http://www.mattbernius.com</u></font></a><font size="3"> | @mattBernius<br>
My calendar: </font><a href="http://bit.ly/hNWEII" target="_blank"><font color="blue" size="3"><u>http://bit.ly/hNWEII</u></font></a>
<br>
<font size="3"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Linganth mailing list</font><font color="blue" size="3"><u><br>
</u></font><a href="mailto:Linganth@listserv.linguistlist.org" target="_blank"><font color="blue" size="3"><u>Linganth@listserv.linguistlist.org</u></font></a><font color="blue" size="3"><u><br>
</u></font><a href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/linganth" target="_blank"><font color="blue" size="3"><u>http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/linganth</u></font></a><font size="3"><br>
</font><br>
<br>
<tt><font>_______________________________________________<br>
Linganth mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Linganth@listserv.linguistlist.org" target="_blank">Linganth@listserv.linguistlist.org</a><br>
</font></tt><a href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/linganth" target="_blank"><tt><font>http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/linganth</font></tt></a><tt><font><br>
</font></tt><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Linganth mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Linganth@listserv.linguistlist.org">Linganth@listserv.linguistlist.org</a><br>
<a href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/linganth" target="_blank">http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/linganth</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>