Mouton "discounts" for ALT members

Alexander Bochkov bochkov at HAWAII.EDU
Fri Nov 11 15:40:15 UTC 2011


Let me raise another issue here. Are scholars allowed to upload their work
(published in a journal that is behind some paywall or in a collection of
articles etc.) to their websites? There are some conscientious linguists
who upload their papers from journals and sometimes even scanned chapters.
If it's ok, more researchers should pay more attention to the content of
their websites and not simply have a CV in a pdf format.

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Ulrike Zeshan <UZeshan at uclan.ac.uk> wrote:

>  This interests me as I am in charge of the Ishara Press, a social
> enterprise publisher under the Deaf Empowerment Foundation. In response to
> Mark, Joseph et al: Our currently emerging in-progress model is maybe
> something in-between commercial and Open Access, and we keep looking for
> the best model. We want to make profits with the Press, as all profits go
> to Foundation projects, e.g. for fees bursaries for deaf university
> students in India, but we also want research to be available, especially in
> developing countries. Therefore, we aim to sell publications during a grace
> period of 3-4 years, and it is our expectation that sales after this period
> will be negligible, as any university libraries etc wanting the books will
> have bought them by then. After the grace period, our policy is that books
> will go online and be available for free, or on DVDs at cost price (not
> everyone can download large videos). As far as possible, net profits earned
> from publications relating thematically to a particular country are
> channeled back into projects run by the Foundation in the same country
> (e.g. sign language teacher training in Turkey), or else the profits are
> used for general and international activities. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Open Access to all is not a straightforward concept for us because real
> access depends not only on the stuff being free but also on people’s
> abilities to engage with and use this stuff. So given low levels of
> education and literacy among the signers we work with, whatever we gain
> from research with sign language using deaf communities is not accessible
> to them merely by being cheap or free. We do not yet have a solution to
> this dilemma.****
>
> ** **
>
> Ulrike Zeshan****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Discussion List for ALT [mailto:LINGTYP at LISTSERV.LINGUISTLIST.ORG]
> *On Behalf Of *Liisa Berghäll
> *Sent:* 11 November 2011 12:53
>
> *To:* LINGTYP at LISTSERV.LINGUISTLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: Mouton "discounts" for ALT members****
>
>  ** **
>
> This thread interests me very much, since I am still editing my Ph.D.
> dissertation “Mauwake reference grammar” in order to submit it to one of
> the major publishers. (We have an oral agreement but nothing signed so
> far.) My two main concerns are 1) the availability also for people who do
> not have a lot of money to buy expensive books, and 2) the ease of use:
> handling a physical book is often easier than scrolling up and down a PDF
> document or thumbing through a printout version of the same. For the first,
> an open access publication would seem a better solution, for the second, a
> printed book. I do not have to worry about the prestige question, as I am
> close to the end of my career and am not seeking academic positions.****
>
> ** **
>
> The grammar is currently freely available online in the form that it was
> during the defence in Sep. 2010 (see link below to the University of
> Helsinki e-thesis service). The link was publicized on the LinguistList, as
> well as a few other places. It would be interesting to get an idea of how
> many of the subscribers to this list, for instance, have downloaded it (and
> also how many have actually used it!). Could I ask for a quick reply from
> those who have done so, with just something like: downloaded (+ used)?****
>
> ** **
>
> Liisa Berghäll****
>
> ** **
>
> https://oa.doria.fi/handle/10024/63602****
>
> ** **
>
> **************************
>
> Liisa Berghäll, Ph.D.****
>
> Helmiäispolku 5 B 26****
>
> 00530 Helsinki****
>
> FINLAND****
>
> ** **
>
> 050-323 0845****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Discussion List for ALT [mailto:LINGTYP at LISTSERV.LINGUISTLIST.ORG]
> *On Behalf Of *Joseph T. Farquharson
> *Sent:* Friday, November 11, 2011 2:05 PM
> *To:* LINGTYP at LISTSERV.LINGUISTLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: Mouton "discounts" for ALT members****
>
> ** **
>
> This is a matter that has concerned me for a number of years especially
> since I work at a university which serves several developing countries. I
> have a recent edited volume with John Benjamins that nobody I know can
> afford. This is sad since even persons who are not linguists wanted to buy
> copies of the book. I get a book grant from my university but the sum per
> year is hardly enough to buy 5 books from publishers such as Benjamins or
> Mouton. The money normally gets spent on introductory texts and material to
> enhance my teaching and cannot really stretch to buy specialist volumes to
> enhance my research. One solution is spending my research time or my
> sleeping time to scout used book sellers online to get bargains.
>
> I have also noticed that purchasing one PDF version of a journal article
> is the same as buying a book elsewhere. There is something fundamentally
> wrong here, even in a capitalist market.
>
> It has already been pointed out by Sebastian and a few others that we need
> to change the political culture in academia. When we stop (automatically)
> judging publications on which publishing house they are produced by as
> opposed to their content then we should see an improvement. Senior scholars
> who make decisions in terms of appointments and promotions need to ensure
> that the works of their colleagues are evaluated based on merit and not on
> publishing house. Until we do that we really cannot point fingers at
> publishers. They are in it to make money and if they can get EUR 139 for
> one book they will take it!
>
> By the way, two years ago when I had a full-time faculty position in
> Jamaica, EUR 139 represented 11% of my monthly salary.
>
> JOseph****
>
> On 11 November 2011 07:41, Martin Haspelmath <haspelmath at eva.mpg.de>
> wrote:****
>
> I haven't made a systematic survey, but it seems to me that the claim that
> Mouton grammars are especially expensive is largely a myth.
>
> For instance, consider the following recent Lincom grammars:
>
> Marian Klamer, A short grammar of Alorese, 142 pp., EUR 48,80
> Muhammad Fannami & Mohammed Aminu Mu'azu, An introduction to morphology
> and syntax of the Kanuri language, 292 pp., EUR 74,60
> Stevenson, Grammar of Palestinian Jewish Aramaic, 98 pp., EUR 42,70
>
> These cost on average EUR 0.31 per page.
>
> Or consider the following Benjamins grammars:
>
> Dileep Chandralal, Sinhala, 296 pp., EUR 110
> Ramesh Vaman Dhongde and Kashi Wali, Marathi, 340 pp., EUR 110
> Yamuna Kachru, Hindi, 309 pp., EUR 125
>
> These cost on average EUR 0.36 per page.
>
> Now compare the four most recent Mouton Grammar Library books:
>
> Marian Klamer, A grammar of Teiwa, 540 pp., EUR 149.95
> Birgit Hellwig, A grammar of Goemai, 612 pp., EUR 149.95
> Næss & Hovdhauden, A grammar of Vaeakau-Taumako, 380 pp., 139.95
> Tasaku Tsunoda, A grammar of Warrongo, 850 pp., EUR 149.95
>
> These cost on average EUR 0.24 per page.
>
> What is special about the Mouton Grammar Library is that it's the only
> grammar series of a major linguistics publisher that includes grammars of
> very small languages, i.e. languages that are interesting only to
> comparative linguists (this is unlike the Benjamins grammars, for example,
> which are all on major Asian languages).
>
> I think that in general, journals of shareholder-owned publishers are the
> real culprits; compare the following estimated page prices of selected
> journals (2011 volume):
>
> Lingua (Elsevier): EUR 0.47 per page
> Language Sciences (Elsevier): EUR 1.42 per page
> Australian Journal of Linguistics (Taylor & Francis) EUR 1.32 per page
>
> (For this reason, I've made it a personal policy not to collaborate with
> shareholder-owned publishers. These include Elsevier, Springer, Taylor &
> Francis, Routledge, Pearson, and Wiley-Blackwell.)
>
> But the points raised by Harald and Sebastian are still very much worth
> debating. The conclusion to draw from their messages is that the publishers
> just do what the academics want. If we change our behaviour, they will,
> too.
>
> Martin****
>
>
>
> On 11/11/2011 03:12, Harald Hammarström wrote: ****
>
> Dear Mark,****
>
> I don't know if it can be called a solution but one possibility for****
>
> authors is to submit to open-access monograph series that welcome
> descriptive materials, e.g., Cadernos de Etnolinguistica for
> (South-)Americanists or Himalayan Linguistics Archive for
> Himalayanists, or even the MPI EVA Language Description Heritage
> repository (ldh.livingsources.org/) then it'll be accessible to any
> scholar with a computer and some indirect or direct access to the
> internet. I suppose few authors are ready to do this because of the
> prestige associated with the magna publishers. But the prestige comes
> from senior scholars acting as series editors, reviewers and the like,
> who might as well do this for an open-access publisher. I have never
> understood why senior scholars continue to do this instead of doing
> the same for an open-access publisher. Perhaps someone who knows
> better could comment?
>
> If you are thinking of a printed and bound version to be affordable to
> a member of the speaker community who is not necessarily a scholar or
> has access to a computer, it seems possible to have a local publisher
> publish the grammar/dictionary giving a much more reasonable price. I
> believe Robbins Burling did exactly this, with a publisher somewhere in***
> *
>
> NE India (so it should be comparable to your case) but I don't know what**
> **
>
> the exact price was and whether it was affordable and actually bought****
>
> by many interested locals.****
>
>
> It is sometimes argued that high book (& journal) prices is necessary
> and justified for added value and development of infrastructure with
> frontline publishing companies. But the overview of profit margins with
> academic publishers by McGuigan and Russell [1] claims that this is not
> at all enough to explain the profit margins (and thus, in turn, the book/
> journal prices). For this they cite a report from an analysis conducted
> under Deutsche Bank which I have not read, but in any case, does anyone
> know the specifics for de Gruyter, Mouton, and/or the MGL book series,
> i.e.,
> what are their profit margins and what is the added value they can be
> said to bring?
>
> all the best,
>
> H
>
> [1]
> Glenn S. McGuigan and Robert D. Russell, 2008. The Business of Academic
> Publishing: A Strategic Analysis of the Academic Journal Publishing
> Industry and its Impact on the Future of Scholarly Publishing. Electronic
> Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, volume 9, number 3.
> http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/v09n03/mcguigan_g01.html***
> *
>
> 2011/11/11 Post, Mark <mark.post at jcu.edu.au>****
>
> Dear Typologists,
>
> I thank Bill Croft for raising this point, but would further suggest that
> there is a deeper issue involved, particularly as regards large-scale
> descriptive work such as grammars and dictionaries. Most work currently
> being done in language description relates to communities or localities in
> which institutions and individual scholars alike have so little purchasing
> power that obtaining an MGL volume is a straightforward impossibility -
> with or without an ALT or similarly-scaled "discount". While exceptions can
> be found, the overall effect of this situation is, one, to radically
> restrict research opportunities in exactly the places where they are often
> most in demand, and two, to foster inequality among our colleagues. I'm
> sure I will be reminded that most scholars are aware of this problem, and
> that there is no point in bringing it up unless I can put forth an
> acceptable solution. I really wish I could. But I do want to propose that
> the current status quo is ethically flawed to a very serious extent, and
> that authors contribute to this problem when we submit our work to
> publishers whose pricing schemes are so dramatically prohibitive as is
> MGL's (whatever other merits they may have). I would also warmly welcome
> suggestions for how matters might be improved from listmembers who might
> have made more progress in their thinking about potential solutions than I
> seem to have.
>
> Regards all around,
>
> Mark
>
>
> Mark W. Post
> The Cairns Institute
> James Cook University
> Smithfield, QLD 4878
> Australia
>
> Tel: +61-7-4042-1898
> Eml: mark.post at jcu.edu.au
> Web: http://jamescook.academia.edu/MarkWPost****
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion List for ALT [mailto:LINGTYP at LISTSERV.LINGUISTLIST.ORG]
> On Behalf Of Bill Croft
> Sent: Friday, 11 November 2011 1:28 AM
> To: LINGTYP at LISTSERV.LINGUISTLIST.ORG
> Subject: Mouton "discounts" for ALT members
>
> Dear typologists,
>
>     Some of you have taken advantage of the discounts that Mouton has
> offered to ALT members for the Mouton Grammar Library and Empirical
> Approaches to Language Typology series. The discount, available in a
> list at the Lingtyp website, used to be around 50% of the (very high)
> list price of the volumes in these series. After 2009, no new volumes
> were added to the discount list. Now the new discount list has
> reappeared but the discount has shrunk to 20%.
>
>    The change in the discount has made the MGL and EALT volumes go
> from (barely) affordable to completely unaffordable to individual
> scholars. This is particularly serious because Mouton volumes are so
> expensive - pretty much the most expensive in the field of
> linguistics - that it is difficult if not impossible for university
> libraries to purchase them. I inquired about the change, and was told
> that De Gruyter decided to standardize the discount for all societies
> at 20%, and since Mouton is owned by De Gruyter, Mouton has to
> conform to De Gruyter policies.
>
>     At this point, according to the current ALT discount list,
> volumes published before 2009 are still available at their original
> discount price. I do not know how long that will last.
>
>    I do not know if it is worth trying, but I would urge members to
> object to this change in policy to Mouton and De Gruyter.
>
> Sincerely,
> Bill Croft****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> -- ****
>
> Martin Haspelmath (haspelmath at eva.mpg.de)****
>
> Max-Planck-Institut fuer evolutionaere Anthropologie, Deutscher Platz 6     ****
>
> D-04103 Leipzig      ****
>
> Tel. (MPI) +49-341-3550 307, (priv.) +49-341-980 1616****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
>
>
>
> --
> *Joseph T. Farquharson*****
>
> *Lecturer
> Department of Liberal Arts
> The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine*****
>
> *Trinidad & Tobago, West Indies *
> *
> Telephone: (868) 662-2002 ext. 3493 | Fax: (868) 663-5059
> Email 1: jtfarquharson at gmail.com
> Email 2: joseph.farquharson at sta.uwi.edu *****
>
> *Website: **www.jotifa.com* <http://www.jotifa.com>* *****
>
> *New co-edited book: Variation in the Caribbean<http://www.benjamins.com/cgi-bin/t_bookview.cgi?bookid=CLL+37>(2011)
> *****
>
> Higher than the highest human thought can reach is God's ideal for His
> children. Godliness--godlikeness--is the goal to be reached. Before the
> student there is opened a path of continual progress. He has an object to
> achieve, a standard to attain, that includes everything good, and pure, and
> noble. He will advance as fast and as far as possible in every branch of
> true knowledge. But his efforts will be directed to objects as much higher
> than mere selfish and temporal interests as the heavens are higher than the
> earth. - E. G. White****
>
>  ** **
>



-- 
Alexander Bochkov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20111111/2b9fca1d/attachment.html>


More information about the Lingtyp mailing list