[Lingtyp] typology of verbalization / adjectivalization

[Andrea Sansò]

Dear all,

Simone Mattiola and I are currently working on a typology of verbalizers
based on a 220-language sample. We are focusing on denominal verbalizers,
but other types are also taken into account. We have presented some
preliminary results at the last SLE meeting, and the hand-out is available
from my Academia page at the following address:
https://www.academia.edu/51120616/A_typology_of_denominal_verb_formation

Hope this helps,
Best,
Andrea

Il gio 25 nov 2021, 02:30 Jesse P. Gates <stauskad at gmail.com> ha scritto:

> Dear Adam,
>
> Attached is an excerpt from my 2021 dissertation, where can be found a few
> unproductive examples of a verbalizing/denominalizing derivation in Stau.
>
> You can also find examples of verbalizing/denominalizing in the following
> references:
>
> Gates, Jesse P., Sami Honkasalo & Yunfan Lai. 2022. From transitive to
> intransitive and voiceless to voiced in Proto-Sino-Tibetan: New evidence
> from Stau, Geshiza, and Khroskyabs. Language and Linguistics 23(2). TBA. Found
> here:
> https://www.academia.edu/43029479/From_transitive_to_intransitive_and_voiceless_to_voiced_in_Proto_Sino_Tibetan_New_evidence_from_Stau_Geshiza_and_Khroskyabs
> .
>
> Honkasalo, Sami. 2019. A grammar of Eastern Geshiza: A culturally
> anchored de- scription. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.
>
> There is also a MA thesis by Michael Randall on Lhasa Tibetan verbalizers:
> https://www.academia.edu/35378474/The_Properties_of_Lhasa_Tibetan_Verbalizers.
> Randall seems to use the verbalizer to extend to light verb constructions,
> if you are including light verb constructions in your definition, then
> Gyalrongic and Tibetan languages have many more examples.
>
>
> [image: Screen Shot 2021-11-25 at 9.09.38 AM.png]
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:54 AM Adam James Ross Tallman <
> ajrtallman at utexas.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> One of my students was interested in writing her term paper on
>> verbalizations in Aymara from a typological perspective ... but I actually
>> don't know any work on the typology of verbalizations and internet searches
>> come up with nearly zilch. Strange given there's so much on
>> nominalization...
>>
>> Does anyone have any leads? Perhaps I'm not looking in the right place.
>>
>> best regards,
>>
>> Adam
>>
>> --
>> Adam J.R. Tallman
>> Post-doctoral Researcher
>> Friedrich Schiller Universität
>> Department of English Studies
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lingtyp mailing list
>> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
>> http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Lingtyp mailing list
> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
> http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20211125/1f21763b/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screen Shot 2021-11-25 at 9.09.38 AM.png
Type: image/png
Size: 776834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20211125/1f21763b/attachment.png>