<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" />
<title></title>
<style type="text/css">
<!--
body{margin-left:10px;margin-right:10px;margin-top:10px;margin-bottom:10px;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body marginleft="10" marginright="10" margintop="10" marginbottom="10">
<span style="background-color:#d0d0d0;"><font face="Arial" size="+0" color="#000000" style="font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt;color:#000000;">Bill</font></span><font face="Times New Roman" size="+0" color="#000000" style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:10pt;color:#000000;"> </font><span style="background-color:#d0d0d0;"><font face="Arial" size="+0" color="#000000" style="font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt;color:#000000;">McGregor treats the equivalent items as affixes in Nyulnyul</font></span><font face="Times New Roman" size="+0" color="#000000"
style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:10pt;color:#000000;"><br />
<br />
No, I have always treated these as clitics in Nyulnyul and other Nyulnyulan languages, <b>never</b> as affixes. In the Nyulnyul of the speaker I worked with the status as clitics vs. separate words is not 100% clearcut. <br />
<br />
Bill<br />
<br />
************************************************<br />
Prof. William McGregor,<br />
Afdeling for Lingvistik,<br />
Aarhus Universitet,<br />
Building 1410, <br />
Ndr. Ringgade,<br />
DK-8000 Aarhus C<br />
Denmark<br />
Ph. 45 89 42 65 59<br />
Fax 45 89 42 65 70<br />
e:mail: <a href="mailto:linwmg@hum.au.dk">linwmg@hum.au.dk</a><br />
<a href="http://www.hum.au.dk/lingvist/linwmg/" target="_blank">http://www.hum.au.dk/lingvist/linwmg/</a><br />
************************************************<br />
</font>
</body>
</html>