<div>
                    <div>Hi all,</div><div>In a similar vein,</div><div><a href="http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2012/01/24/rspb.2011.2296.short" style="color: rgb(0, 106, 227); ">http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2012/01/24/rspb.2011.2296.short</a></div><div>came out last week.</div><div>Claire</div>
                </div>
                <div></div>
                 
                <p style="color: #A0A0A8;">On Friday, February 10, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Michael Cysouw wrote:</p>
                <blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;">
                    <span><div><div><div>Dear Colleagues,</div><div><br></div><div>we are happy to announce even more discussion (or rebuttal, if you like) of Aktinson's paper about the origin of phoneme systems:</div><div><br></div><div>      <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/content/335/6069.toc#TechnicalComments">http://www.sciencemag.org/content/335/6069.toc#TechnicalComments</a></div><div><br></div><div>I find it highly encouraging for the efficiency of our field that it took Science even longer to publish these than LT, even though we already had submitted our technical comment much earlier.</div><div><br></div><div>best</div><div>michael</div></div></div></span>
                 
                 
                 
                 
                </blockquote>
                 
                <div>
                    <br>
                </div>