<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    For me the most annoying thing about this nonsense is that it does a
    discredit to serious -- albeit controversial and also oft-riduculed
    -- work that is being done on the effect that language might have on
    cognition, eg. Lera Boroditsky's solid scientific experiments
    showing that the presence or absence of grammatical TAM marking does
    have an effect on how we conceptualize time. <br>
    <br>
    On 26/02/2013 17:29, Scott Delancey wrote:
    <blockquote cite="mid:8e8ebc7573f6bcb5b83b9785f3aca4a1@uoregon.edu"
      type="cite">
      <p>The most annoying thing about this nonsense is that English is
        <em>not</em> a "strong FTR" language:</p>
      <p>"If I wanted to explain to an English-speaking colleague why I
        can't attend a meeting later today, I could not say 'I go to a
        seminar', English grammar would oblige me to say 'I will go, am
        going, or have to go to a seminar'."</p>
      <p>First, of course we regularly use the simple present for future
        reference: <em>I fly to New York on Friday</em>.  Second,
        neither <em>I am going</em> nor <em>I have to go</em> is in
        any way a future construction. Neither is <em>I will go to a
          seminar</em>, which is modal, not tense, but we can let that
        go, because, in the context indicated here it is quite
        impossible. In certain contexts one could say <em>I'm going to
          go ...</em>, which is a real future construction. But it
        simply is not obligatory in English to use any kind of future
        construction here --<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande',
          Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><span
          style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Arial,
          Helvetica, sans-serif;"> <span style="font-family: 'times new
            roman', times;">the most natural way to say this is with
            the </span></span><span style="font-family: 'times new
          roman', times;"><strong style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande',
            Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">present</strong> progressive:<em
            style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, Arial,
            Helvetica, sans-serif;"> <span style="font-size: x-small;">I
              am going to a seminar</span></em>.</span></p>
      <p>On 2013-02-26 7:54, Nigel Vincent wrote:</p>
      <blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px;
        border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px; width:100%"><!-- html ignored --><!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored -->
        <div style="direction: ltr; font-family: Tahoma; color: #000000;
          font-size: 10pt;">At Frans' prompting I post this piece of
          nonsense for typological (or indeed other!) comment:<br>
          <br>
          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21518574">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21518574</a><br>
          <br>
          Nigel<br>
          <br>
          <div><br>
            <div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;">
              <div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;">
                <div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;">
                  <div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;">
                    <div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;">Professor
                      Nigel Vincent, FBA<br>
                      Professor Emeritus of General & Romance
                      Linguistics<br>
                      The University of Manchester</div>
                    <div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;"><br>
                      <div>Vice-President for Research & HE Policy,
                        The British Academy</div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div>Linguistics & English Language<br>
                        School of Arts, Languages and Cultures</div>
                      <div><span class="Apple-tab-span"
                          style="white-space: pre;"></span>The
                        University of Manchester</div>
                      <div><span class="Apple-tab-span"
                          style="white-space: pre;"></span>Manchester
                        M13 9PL</div>
                      <div><span class="Apple-tab-span"
                          style="white-space: pre;"></span>UK</div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.llc.manchester.ac.uk/subjects/lel/staff/nigel-vincent/">http://www.llc.manchester.ac.uk/subjects/lel/staff/nigel-vincent/</a></div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
David Gil

Department of Linguistics
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Deutscher Platz 6, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany

Telephone: 49-341-3550321 Fax: 49-341-3550119
Email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gil@eva.mpg.de">gil@eva.mpg.de</a>
Webpage:  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.eva.mpg.de/~gil/">http://www.eva.mpg.de/~gil/</a>

</pre>
  </body>
</html>