<HTML xmlns:o><HEAD>
<META content="text/html charset=utf-8" http-equiv=Content-Type></HEAD>
<BODY
style="WORD-WRAP: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space"
dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000">
<DIV>According to the excellent remarks by Elisa Roma why do not create the
neologism <EM>regrouper </EM>from the verb <EM>to regroup </EM>“reassemble or
cause to reassemble into organized groups”?</DIV>
<DIV>Best,</DIV>
<DIV>Paolo</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000">Prof.Paolo
Ramat<BR>Università di Pavia (retired)<BR>Istituto Universitario di Studi
Superiori (IUSS Pavia, retired)<BR>Societas Linguist. Europ., Honorary
Member<BR><BR>Piazzetta Arduino 11<BR>I – 27100 Pavia<BR>##39 347 044 98 44
(port.)<BR>##39 0382 27 0 27 (home)</DIV>
<DIV
style='FONT-SIZE: small; TEXT-DECORATION: none; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri"; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; COLOR: #000000; FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline'>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt tahoma">
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<DIV style="font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A
title=sivakalyan.princeton@gmail.com
href="mailto:sivakalyan.princeton@gmail.com">Siva Kalyan</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:58 AM</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=frisella@iol.it href="mailto:frisella@iol.it">Elisa
Roma</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Cc:</B> <A title=lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org
href="mailto:lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org">lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</A>
</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Lingtyp] R: genifiers (gender
markers/classifiers)</DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV
style='FONT-SIZE: small; TEXT-DECORATION: none; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri"; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; COLOR: #000000; FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline'>Would
“tagger” work? It’s in the same semantic neighbourhood as “classifier” and
<I>raggruppatore</I>; isn’t already used in grammatical theory (as far as I
know); and has a suitably 21st-century ring to it :). It does of course have an
existing usage in computational linguistics (e.g. “part-of-speech tagger”); but
I think there’s little risk of confusion with this usage.
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The hyperonym for “gender” and “class” would thus be “tag”.<BR>
<DIV><BR class=Apple-interchange-newline><SPAN
style="WHITE-SPACE: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; FLOAT: none; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT: 12px helvetica; DISPLAY: inline !important; LETTER-SPACING: normal; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px">Siva</SPAN>
</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV>On 22 Mar 2017, at 8:16 pm, Elisa Roma <<A
href="mailto:frisella@iol.it">frisella@iol.it</A>> wrote:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV class=WordSection1
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px; FONT-FAMILY: helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; page: wordsection1; font-variant-caps: normal">
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">Dear
Martin, dear typologists,<o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">thank
you for this discussion.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)"><o:p></o:p></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">I
had a similar reaction to Sebastian Nordhoff’s, that is I felt (and feel) that
the word genifier is too easily connected to genes. In fact looking at the way
it was coined I had imagined, for what is worth, exactly the same
alternatives, clander or clender. The morphological problem with genifier is
that it is meant to be a blend, but in fact it’s made up as (or homonymous
with) a derivative. I had also thought that speakers of Romance
languages may be more sensitive about this problem, but this may not be the
case.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">Still,
there is the semantic problem, because brunch and smog are not
hyperonyms, as has already been noted.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)"><o:p></o:p></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">IF
we need a hyperonym as Martin has argued, but others have questioned, I feel
that anyway this is not a very good one, and not simply for neophobic issues.
As I am not a native speaker I feel somewhat uncomfortable in coining English
words. If I had to coin something for what Martin has defined I’d use Italian
raggruppatore (possibly to be translated with English grouper?). A
raggruppatore is something that (generally) groups together (nouns in
grammatical or semantic categories, but also words in phrases, referents in
pragmatical kinds,…), like a sheep-dog does with sheep. Perhaps it’s too
general a term, but that may have the advantage of not encouraging its (ab)use
in descriptions , something which Randy La Polla has warned us
against.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">But
we’ll have to look at new generations of linguists to see what happens with
new words. So, I have to step out.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)"><o:p></o:p></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">All
the best,<o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">Elisa<o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)"><o:p></o:p></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">P.S.
I asked my husband what could a word like genifier refer to for linguists and
he said: “Genitive”.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)"><o:p></o:p></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)"><o:p></o:p></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">Elisa
Roma, PhD<o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">General
and Celtic Linguistics<o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">Dipartimento
di Studi Umanistici<o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">Università
di Pavia<o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">Italia<o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)"><A
style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple"
href="mailto:elisa.roma@unipv.it"><SPAN
style="COLOR: rgb(5,99,193)">elisa.roma@unipv.it</SPAN></A><o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)"><o:p></o:p></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)"><o:p></o:p></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)"><o:p></o:p></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(31,73,125)">
<o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><B><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif">Da:</SPAN></B><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif"><SPAN
class=Apple-converted-space> </SPAN>Lingtyp [<A
href="mailto:lingtyp-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org">mailto:lingtyp-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org</A>]<SPAN
class=Apple-converted-space> </SPAN><B>Per conto di<SPAN
class=Apple-converted-space> </SPAN></B>Johanna
NICHOLS<BR><B>Inviato:</B><SPAN
class=Apple-converted-space> </SPAN>mercoledì 22 marzo 2017
06.08<BR><B>A:</B><SPAN class=Apple-converted-space> </SPAN>Randy John
LaPolla (Prof) <<A
href="mailto:RandyLaPolla@ntu.edu.sg">RandyLaPolla@ntu.edu.sg</A>><BR><B>Cc:</B><SPAN
class=Apple-converted-space> </SPAN><A
href="mailto:lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org">lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</A><BR><B>Oggetto:</B><SPAN
class=Apple-converted-space> </SPAN>Re: [Lingtyp] genifiers (gender
markers/classifiers)<o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 12pt">Where,
oh where, is the generation that gave us terms like "pied piping"? We
need that kind of creativity now.<o:p></o:p></P></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Johanna
Nichols<o:p></o:p></DIV></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">On
Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Randy John LaPolla (Prof) <<A
style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple"
href="mailto:RandyLaPolla@ntu.edu.sg"
target=_blank>RandyLaPolla@ntu.edu.sg</A>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0cm; PADDING-TOP: 0cm; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; PADDING-LEFT: 6pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 4.8pt; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1pt solid; PADDING-RIGHT: 0cm; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0cm"
type="cite">
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Hi
All,<SPAN class=Apple-converted-space> </SPAN><o:p></o:p></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Thanks
to Sebastian, Walter, and Mark for bringing up important points. I also feel
there are structural and functional differences between genders and “noun
classifiers”. I put the latter in scare quotes because it is as Mark said,
they aren’t really classifying the noun, but are specifying the referent of
the noun, and so the same noun can take different classifiers in many cases
depending on the referent involved. In some uses they are actually
referential themselves, and so can also be modified in some
languages.<o:p></o:p></DIV></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">But
my main reason for writing is to mention that this discussion is relevant to
our discussion last year about classification in typology and language
description.<o:p></o:p></DIV></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Whenever
we make a higher abstraction we are moving one more step away from the facts
of the languages. The terms “gender” and “noun classifier” are already
abstractions across a range of different phenomena, and so there is some
loss of information about the diversity of forms when we use such terms, and
if we then make a categorial merger of these two forms, as suggested, we
then lose even more information. It may be that some typologists find this
useful, and are willing to pay this price to be able to make grand
generalisations, but the loss of information must be kept in mind, and there
is also the danger that this usage filters back into descriptions of
languages. We already have the case of the introduction of “converb”, which
was a categorial merger of different types of non-finite verb constructions
that may have been useful for some people, but what happened is that some
people doing descriptions of languages now feel it is enough to say
something is a converb construction without going into the details of what
sort of converb it is. So we have a loss of information in the descriptions
as well.<o:p></o:p></DIV></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">As
a number of people said, it may be we don’t have enough terminology in
linguistics, but for me it is a lack of terms for doing fine-grained
analysis of actual linguistic structures, not a lack of terms for high level
abstractions that obscure the diversity of actual
structures.<o:p></o:p></DIV></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">If
one wants to talk about these types together, I recommend keeping something
like “noun classification devices” (even though as I said they aren’t
necessarily classifying the noun, but the referent) because it is
transparent and also has the plural marker, keeping us aware that we are
talking about a plurality of devices and not one single type. The fact that
it is not short and catchy will also help prevent the problem of it being
used as a descriptive label.<o:p></o:p></DIV></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Randy<o:p></o:p></DIV></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
class=m5709932468916639368apple-style-span><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: arial, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(34,34,34); BACKGROUND-COLOR: white">-----</SPAN></SPAN><o:p></o:p></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><B><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: arial, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(34,34,34); BACKGROUND-COLOR: white">Prof.
Randy J. LaPolla, PhD FAHA</SPAN></B><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: arial, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(34,34,34); BACKGROUND-COLOR: white"> </SPAN><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: calibri, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(34,34,34); BACKGROUND-COLOR: white">（羅仁地）</SPAN><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: arial, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(34,34,34); BACKGROUND-COLOR: white">|
Division of Linguistics and Multilingual Studies | Nanyang Technological
University</SPAN><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: arial, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(34,34,34)"><BR><SPAN
class=m5709932468916639368apple-style-span><SPAN
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: white">HSS-03-45, 14 Nanyang Drive, Singapore
637332 | Tel: (65) 6592-1825 GMT+8h | Fax: (65) 6795-6525 |<SPAN
class=Apple-converted-space> </SPAN><A
style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple"
href="http://randylapolla.net/"
target=_blank>http://randylapolla.net/</A></SPAN></SPAN></SPAN><SPAN><o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
class=m5709932468916639368apple-style-span><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: arial, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(34,34,34); BACKGROUND-COLOR: white">Most
recent book:</SPAN></SPAN><SPAN><o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: arial, sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(34,34,34); BACKGROUND-COLOR: white"><A
style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple"
href="https://www.routledge.com/The-Sino-Tibetan-Languages-2nd-Edition/LaPolla-Thurgood/p/book/9781138783324"
target=_blank>https://www.routledge.com/The-Sino-Tibetan-Languages-2nd-Edition/LaPolla-Thurgood/p/book/9781138783324</A></SPAN><o:p></o:p></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </DIV></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 12pt"><o:p></o:p> </P></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </DIV>
<DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt; MARGIN-TOP: 5pt" type="cite">
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">On
22 Mar 2017, at 7:25 AM, Mark W. Post <<A
style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple"
href="mailto:markwpost@gmail.com"
target=_blank>markwpost@gmail.com</A>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></DIV></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<P
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 0cm; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0cm">Martin/All
-<SPAN class=Apple-converted-space> </SPAN><o:p></o:p></P>
<P
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 0cm; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0cm">As
others have already pointed out, there are two related issues here, one
terminological and the other typological. I consider the terminological
issue pretty trivial - I certainly agree that we have less terminology
than we need for the number of concepts that we want to talk about in a
more-or-less contrastive way, and while I'm willing to bet that even those
of us who share this view probably blanched (at least initially) at the
sight of the term "genifier", at the end of the day it doesn't matter -
"grammaticalization" has more suffixes than it needs, and if you unpack
them all they don't actually add up to what we use the term to mean, but
the world keeps turning regardless.<SPAN
class=Apple-converted-space> </SPAN><o:p></o:p></P>
<P
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 0cm; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0cm">But
I'd take issue with the motivation for a categorical merger in the first
place (which is what I take the introduction of a superordinate label to
amount to - if that's wrong, then I've misunderstood something). It seems
to me that most of the literature on classifiers focuses on the semantic
dimension of classification, probably because this is what stands out as
exotic from a European perspective - and, indeed, the label "classifier"
itself suggests this. And it's the semantic dimension that is mostly being
focused on when an alignment between gender systems and classifier systems
is proposed - even, and especially, when superordinate labels like "noun
classification" are proposed. But this is only part of the story. The
*function* of classifiers - and here, I *only* mean the "numeral
classifiers" of Greater Mainland Southeast Asia - is not classification,
but referential specification. They function, that is, to individuate
entities as instances of types. That is why the most frequently-used
classifier by far in Mandarin Chinese, for example, is (almost)
semantically empty, and cliticizes to demonstratives and the numeral 'one'
in most mentions. Other languages take matters further, by deputizing the
generic classifier itself as a de facto indefinite article - consider, for
example, Nuoso Yi (data from Liu and Gu 2011 DOI:<SPAN
class=Apple-converted-space> </SPAN><A
style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple"
href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/tsl.96.11liu"
target=_blank>10.1075/tsl.96.11liu</A><SPAN
class=Apple-converted-space> </SPAN>- apologies if the glosses don't
align properly).<o:p></o:p></P>
<P
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 0cm; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0cm">i33ti34
gu33 ʑo33
si44 la33
.<BR>coat
CL
catch
take
come <SPAN
class=Apple-converted-space> </SPAN><BR>‘Bring a coat (to
me).’<o:p></o:p></P>
<P
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 0cm; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0cm">Hence
the frequent observation that languages with classifiers tend to lack
articles (though it's true that they don't always).<o:p></o:p></P>
<P
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 0cm; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0cm">Given
these facts, it seems that there's an at least equal argument in favor of
merging classifiers with other referential markers, and in particular
articles, so: clarticles? classicles? artifiers? Hmmm...<o:p></o:p></P>
<P
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 0cm; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0cm">It
seems to me that what we're really talking about here is the same thing
that we usually talk about, which is that there are no
cross-linguistically watertight categories, but we want to do typology
anyway, so what do we do? We can select a semantic parameter (a
"comparative concept") in terms of which categories may be similar across
languages, but they will differ in other respects. If we focus on those
other respects, we can end up with a different typology. It may be that
the real difficulty here is that our traditional category-labels, and the
categories they are designed to capture, are
multi-dimensional.<o:p></o:p></P>
<P
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 0cm; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0cm">Mark<o:p></o:p></P>
<P
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 0cm; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0cm"><o:p></o:p> </P>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">On
22/03/2017 8:34 AM, Sebastian Nordhoff wrote:<o:p></o:p></DIV></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt; MARGIN-TOP: 5pt" type="cite">
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt; MARGIN-TOP: 5pt" type="cite"><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">And the term “gen-ifier” is completely parallel to “class-ifier” – it’s<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">a marker that puts a noun in a genus.<o:p></o:p></PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">if "genifier" is used to put a noun in a *genus*, it is out as a marker<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">for the superordinate concept encompassing both noun class and gender.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Best<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Sebastian<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt; MARGIN-TOP: 5pt" type="cite"><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">(Actually, since English distinguishes between “gender” and “genus”, one<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">might even introduce “genus” as a new feature term, a cover term for<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">gender and classifierhood. That would certainly be found more acceptable<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">to neophobics than "clender".)<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Martin<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">On 21.03.17 20:38, Sebastian Nordhoff wrote:<o:p></o:p></PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt; MARGIN-TOP: 5pt" type="cite"><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Dear all,<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">as someone who has not worked extensively on either of these concepts, I<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">still have to say that the term "genifier" strikes me as odd. My first<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">thought upon seeing the subject of the mail was "OK, this will be about<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">making something a gender, or a gene, or a knee-like thing maybe, let's<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">see". I was misled by terms such as "intensifier", used to make<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">something more intense, and certainly also, albeit more on phonological<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">grounds, by "gentrification", which is a widely debated topic where I<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">live.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">The attempt to blend "GEnder" and "classiFIER" is not successful in my<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">view, as "-fier" is not really the important formative here; "class" is.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">If there is a desire for a blend, I would rather go for "Clender" or<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">"Clander", which would not lead to misparsings/misinterpretations as the<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">one I had.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">As a final note, a "classifier" does something to an X, while "gender"<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">is a property of an X.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">(1) /ladida/ is of gender X<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">(2) ?/ladida/ is of classifier X<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">(3) ?/-dada/ is a gender<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">(4) /-dada/ is a classifier<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">It is unclear to me whether the two concepts "gender" and "classifier"<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">do actually have a superordinate concept. Possibly, one has to use<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">"gender marker" and "classifier", or "noun class" and "gender" as<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">subordinate concepts to arrive at a good superordinate concept.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Best wishes<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Sebastian<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">On 03/20/2017 04:05 PM, Martin Haspelmath wrote:<o:p></o:p></PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt; MARGIN-TOP: 5pt" type="cite"><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Dear typologists,<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Cross-linguistic terminology (comparative concepts) should be both clear<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">and conform to the tradition, in order to preserve continuity with the<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">older literature.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">In the case of the terms "gender" and "classifier", it seems that these<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">two goals cannot be achieved simultaneously without coining a new term<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">("genifier").<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">There is quite a bit of general literature on gender/classifiers (e.g.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Dixon 1986; Grinevald 2000; Aikhenvald 2000; Seifart 2010; Corbett &<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Fedden 2016), but none of these works provide clear definitions of these<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">terms, and the more recent literature (e.g. Corbett & Fedden, and also<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Seifart & Payne 2007) actually emphasizes that there is no reason to say<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">that gender markers and classifiers are distinct phenomena in the<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">world's languages.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Thus, it seems to me that we need the new term "genifier", perhaps<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">defined as follows:<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">A *genifier system* is a system of grammatical markers which occur on<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">nominal modifiers, predicates or anaphoric pronouns, and each of which<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">expresses (i.e. normally reflects, but sometimes contributes) a broad<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">property other than person and number of the controlling noun (i.e. for<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">nominal modifiers: the modificatum, for predicates: an argument, for<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">anaphoric pronouns: the antecedent).<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">The alternative to coining a new term, it seems to me, would be to<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">extend the meaning of the term "gender" or of the term "classifier" in<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">such a way that there would be no more continuity with the earlier<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">literature.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Given the above definition of genifier, we can perhaps define "gender"<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">and "numeral classifier" as follows (as arbitrary subcategories of<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">genifiers, defined just to preserve continuity with the older<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">literature):<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">A *gender system* (= a system of gender markers) is a system of<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">genifiers which includes no more than 20 genifiers and which is not<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">restricted to numeral modifiers.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">A *numeral classifier system* is a system of genifiers which is<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">restricted to numeral (plus optionally other adnominal) modifiers.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">I wonder if the above definitions have any obvious defects, i.e. any<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">cases that everyone would call gender or numeral classifier and that<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">wouldn't fall under the definitions, or cases that fall under them and<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">that nobody would call gender or numeral classifier.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Note that the new term "genifier" also has the advantage that the whole<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">domain can be called *genification* (rather than the cumbersome "noun<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">classification/nominal classification", which is also vague because<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">there are all kinds of "classes" or "classifications" of nouns which<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">have nothing to do with genifiers).<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Any comments?<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Thanks,<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Martin<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">*************************<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">References<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. /Classifiers: A typology of noun<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">categorization devices/. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Corbett, Greville G. & Sebastian Fedden. 2016. Canonical gender.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">/Journal of Linguistics/ 52(3). 495--531.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Dixon, R. M. W. 1986. Noun classes and noun classification in<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">typological perspective. In Colette Grinevald Craig (ed.), /Noun classes<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">and categorization/, 105--112. Amsterdam: Benjamins.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Grinevald, Colette G. 2000. A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">In Gunter Senft (ed.), /Systems of nominal classification/, 50--92.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Seifart, Frank. 2010. Nominal classification. /Language and Linguistics<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Compass/ 4(8). 719--736.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Seifart, Frank & Doris L. Payne. 2007. Nominal classification in the<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">North West Amazon: Issues in areal diffusion and typological<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">characterization. /International Journal of American Linguistics/ 73(4).<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">381--387.<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Lingtyp mailing list<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><A style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple" href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org" target=_blank>Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</A><o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><A style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple" href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp" target=_blank>http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</A><o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Lingtyp mailing list<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><A style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple" href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org" target=_blank>Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</A><o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><A style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple" href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp" target=_blank>http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</A><o:p></o:p></PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Lingtyp mailing list<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><A style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple" href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org" target=_blank>Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</A><o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><A style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple" href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp" target=_blank>http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</A><o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Lingtyp mailing list<o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><A style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple" href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org" target=_blank>Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</A><o:p></o:p></PRE><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><A style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple" href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp" target=_blank>http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</A><o:p></o:p></PRE></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">_______________________________________________<BR>Lingtyp
mailing list<BR><A style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple"
href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org"
target=_blank>Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</A><BR><A
style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple"
href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp"
target=_blank>http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</A><o:p></o:p></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=MsoNormal
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"
align=center>
<HR align=center SIZE=2 width="100%">
</DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: arial, sans-serif; COLOR: gray">CONFIDENTIALITY:
This email is intended solely for the person(s) named and may be
confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
please delete it, notify us and do not copy, use, or disclose its
contents.<BR>Towards a sustainable earth: Print only when necessary. Thank
you.</SPAN><o:p></o:p></DIV></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 12pt"><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Lingtyp
mailing list<BR><A style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple"
href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</A><BR><A
style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple"
href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp"
target=_blank>http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</A><o:p></o:p></P></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman', serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><o:p></o:p> </DIV></DIV></DIV><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px; FONT-FAMILY: helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; FLOAT: none; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline !important; LETTER-SPACING: normal; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-variant-caps: normal">_______________________________________________</SPAN><BR
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px; FONT-FAMILY: helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-variant-caps: normal"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px; FONT-FAMILY: helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; FLOAT: none; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline !important; LETTER-SPACING: normal; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-variant-caps: normal">Lingtyp
mailing list</SPAN><BR
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px; FONT-FAMILY: helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-variant-caps: normal"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px; FONT-FAMILY: helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; FLOAT: none; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline !important; LETTER-SPACING: normal; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-variant-caps: normal"><A
href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</A></SPAN><BR
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px; FONT-FAMILY: helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-variant-caps: normal"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12px; FONT-FAMILY: helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; FLOAT: none; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline !important; LETTER-SPACING: normal; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-variant-caps: normal"><A
href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp">http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</A></SPAN></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV>
<P>
<HR>
_______________________________________________<BR>Lingtyp mailing
list<BR>Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org<BR>http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp<BR></DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>