<div dir="ltr"><div><div>Dear Martin and all,<br></div>as I am a regular attendant of the ICHL, let me give you some detials about the ISHL: this is the International Society for Historical Linguistics, it has a structure, with a president, who is also the organized of the biennial conference, a secretary, an executive committee and a nominating committee. Before each meeting, the nominating committee comes up with suggestions for the members of the executive and of the nominating committee that must be replaced, the secretary circulates them on histling-list, then the new officers are voted during the business meeting by whoever is attending the conference. The secretary in theory is also nominated every other year, but in pratice he's always been<span name="John Charles Smith" class="gmail-gD"> John Charles Smith</span> at least since the late 1980s. One is automatically a member of the society by attending the meetings.<br></div>Silvia<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Silvia Luraghi<br>Università di Pavia<br>Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici, Sezione di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata<br>Strada Nuova 65<br>I-27100 Pavia<br>tel.: +39/0382/984685<div style="display:inline"></div><div>Web page personale: <a href="http://lettere.unipv.it/diplinguistica/docenti.php?&id=68" target="_blank">http://lettere.unipv.it/diplinguistica/docenti.php?&id=68</a></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2017-11-24 14:03 GMT+01:00 Martin Haspelmath <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:haspelmath@shh.mpg.de" target="_blank">haspelmath@shh.mpg.de</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Dear all,<u></u><u></u>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Many thanks to Jeff Good for his clear and
candid
explanation of the situation with ALT (copied below). If one finds
it unsatisfactory, I see
two different directions in which ALT could develop in the future:
the
“Autonomous Association” option, and the “ALT Committee” option
(both of which
would be improvements, I think).<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The <b>Autonomous
Association</b> model would mean a development toward an
independent
association (like the LSA) that collects its membership fees and
has a proper
governance structure, with clear statutes, accountable officers
and a way for
the members to influence elections and motions. This would mean
much more work
for the officers, and this is possible only if they are
remunerated generously,
i.e. if the membership fee is increased substantially (e.g. to
assist the
officers with money for student assistants). Officers who do a lot
of work
should also be given subsidies for attending the conferences, so
that they can
meet (at least once a year) to discuss matters face to face. An
Autonomous
Association can also think about subsidizing members from poor
countries, and
of finding other ways of giving special support to those who need
it. It might
also think of having its own journal (recall that LT is owned by
De Gruyter), or
of supporting other open-access initiatives like LangSci Press
that are
important for members with no access to libraries.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The question is what would motivate the members
to pay a
more substantial amount – what exactly do they get out of it for
themselves?
When I joined the LSA and the SLE in the 1980s, it was also
because I wanted to
get the journals (to read them at home and not only in the
libraries), and even
in the 1990s, printed membership address lists were
very important. Nowadays, these motivations are basically gone,
and one would
need to appeal to altruism; moreover, there may simply be too few
typologists
(compared to the thousands of LSA members). So the other option
may be more
realistic:<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The <b>ALT
Committee</b>
option is much easier to realize, and it would involve much less
work for quite
a few people. By this I mean the model by which historical
linguistics is
organized (as far as I know). There is an e-mail list (Histling,
corresponding
to our Lingtyp), and there is an “ICHL committee”, i.e. a group of
people who
are in regular contact and discuss among themselves who will
organize the next
International Conference of Historical Linguistics. There are no
elections, and
the committee makes sure to coopt new people in an ad hoc way (if
I understand
correctly – there does not seem to be an ICHL website that
explains the model).
This seems to work quite well: The ICHL conferences have been
taking place very
regularly (in a bienniel rhythm, like ALT), with large numbers of
participants. The ICHL community has no
journal of its own, but there seem to be enough other historical
linguistics
journals.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">This is also the model by which SWL (Syntax of
the World’s
Languages, a conference series that I helped found in 2004) works:
There is a
committee that consists of the organizers of the last four SWLs or
so, and
there is no other structure, so no extra work is created. Like
ICHL, <a href="https://swl8.sciencesconf.org/" target="_blank">SWL</a> has been
taking place regularly every two years and is working well.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">If typologists adopted the “ALT Committee”
model, then we
would not have to pay membership fees anymore, and the main
deciders would be
those who do most of the actual work anyway: the ALT conference
organizers.
They would get to select the programme committee and any other
issues
related to the conference organization. LT would be left for De
Gruyter (the
legal owners) to look after, and would no doubt continue to
thrive, given that
De Gruyter generates most of its income via big packages. (Access
to journal
articles does not seem to be a problem anymore – most of us seem
to have access
through our institutions, or less formally via Academia.edu or
Sci-Hub.) <br>
<br>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I was on the Executive Committee of the SLE for
the last three years (president in 2016), and many of the same
problems exist there – I suggested an "SLE Committee" solution
also for the Societas Linguistica Europaea. But the SLE does not
have an e-mail list, so there is no way to discuss these matters
among the members.<br>
<br>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It may seem very surprising that I am
suggesting that ALT (and SLE) could (or should) scale down in such
a drastic way, but we need to keep in mind why ALT was founded: In
order to bring typologists together – there was a real need for
this in the 1990s, and our whole community owes Frans Plank a lot
(whi initiated ALT and LT in the mid 1990s). But nowadays, we can
stay together in much simpler ways (especially thanks to the
internet and Lingtyp, and thanks to De Gruyter's efforts for LT).
The world has changed dramatically since 1997, so maybe ALT needs
to change as well.<br>
<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">All the best,<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Martin<br>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<u></u><u></u></p>
<div class="m_-4273842647187947886moz-cite-prefix">On 23.11.17 13:23, Good, Jeff wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>Dear all,
The ALT Executive Committee has been actively reading all posts related to the proposed Code of Conduct. If we have not replied sooner, it is simply due to the inherent delays for deliberation among members of a body spread across multiple time zones.
We take the concerns about the procedure adopted here seriously, and I would like to provide some background information that may be helpful to those following this discussion on this list.
-A copy of the ALT statutes can be found here: <a class="m_-4273842647187947886moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.linguistic-typology.org/ALTstatutes.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.linguistic-<wbr>typology.org/ALTstatutes.pdf</a>. (I don’t know how long they have been there precisely, but a search of the Internet Archive suggests that they have been posted for some time on the main homepage, but in a place that would be easy to miss.)
-As has been pointed out, the ALT Statutes are not especially helpful in determining the best procedure for adopting something like a code of conduct. In fact, from what I understand of the Association, it has always been run relatively informally. In some respects, I believe that this makes sense: It has limited resources and is run by volunteers. Asking them to adhere formal procedures would add to their workloads in ways that would likely make it impossible to find willing volunteers to do the work needed to keep the Association going.
-For many years, ALT membership has been handled by the publisher of Linguistic Typology, De Gruyter Mouton, and they have provided an important service to the Association in this regard. However, for various reasons, the nature of the arrangement makes it difficult for ALT to maintain a proper list of current members. This has long made the restriction that “only members can vote” difficult to strictly maintain. Since most votes have involved elected offices and have been overwhelmingly positive, this has not been a significant practical concern until now.
-The proposal to adopt a code of conduct, and consideration of the Association’s response to the problems associated with sexual harassment more broadly, took place over a period of several months and was not restricted to the Executive Committee alone but also, in particular, involved consultation with the Local Organizing Committee for the upcoming conference in Canberra. The Executive Committee decided that a matter of this kind should be put to a vote of the membership rather than being treated as a simple Executive Committee decision. The discussion on this list suggests that this was the right decision but that the procedure to be followed should have been thought through more carefully. We acknowledge this and will work to address this issue.
-Previous recent ALT votes have not been anonymous, but I decided that a vote on the Code of Conduct should allow for anonymity and, for expediency, decided to include the vote for the Executive Committee on the same ballot. This does mean that we cannot fully verify if “members” are voting, but this is extremely difficult anyway since we can’t actually get a complete list of members as indicated above. Given this, concerns regarding procedure are well taken. When the voting period closes, the Executive Committee will examine the results with this problem in mind. Even before the discussion on this list took place, I would have made clear to them the potential problems with interpreting anything other than an extremely clear vote as a vote in favor or opposed. (Some might wonder why these procedures were not carefully laid out before hand. This goes back to the relatively informal way that ALT has been run over the years for reasons mentioned above.)
-At this stage, the Executive Committee plans to wait to develop a specific plan forward until the vote has completed. At that time, it can examine the results of the vote and make them available to readers of this list. This will provide useful information even if only treated as an informal poll. We want to make clear that we have no interest in forcing a controversial code on the entire membership. Several posts to this list have suggested how we can move forward productively on this topic from a procedural perspective. We can use these as a starting point for consideration of this issue at the biennial meeting and then take the conclusions of that meeting back to this list to get further feedback. In the meantime, we can work with the Local Organizing Committee to develop a specific way to address the issue of harassment at the upcoming conference that takes all of the concerns raised on this list into account.
I would like to take this opportunity to add that some members of the Executive Committee have heard privately from individuals on this list about the importance to them of adopting a code of conduct along the lines of what has been proposed due to their own personal experiences. It is clear that the nature of the conversation on this list has not been conducive to the participation of individuals who have experienced harassment or uninvited behavior at conferences. I believe it is important for those on this list to know that these viewpoints have been made known, even if they can only be transmitted indirectly.
Finally, for those would like to provide further input on the code or the procedure for moving forward, I would ask that you consider whether your comments are best directed to all readers of this list or to the Executive Committee specifically. If the latter, I would encourage you to contact us directly, or you can contact me or Kristine Hildebrandt, and we will pass your input along to them.
We will continue to actively read this discussion as we develop a proposal to move forward on this issue.
Best
Jeff Good
President, Association for Linguistic Typology
______________________________<wbr>_________________
Lingtyp mailing list
<a class="m_-4273842647187947886moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org" target="_blank">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.<wbr>org</a>
<a class="m_-4273842647187947886moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp" target="_blank">http://listserv.linguistlist.<wbr>org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
</font></span></pre><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
</font></span></blockquote><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<br>
<pre class="m_-4273842647187947886moz-signature" cols="72">--
Martin Haspelmath (<a class="m_-4273842647187947886moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:haspelmath@shh.mpg.de" target="_blank">haspelmath@shh.mpg.de</a>)
Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History
Kahlaische Strasse 10
D-07745 Jena
&
Leipzig University
IPF 141199
Nikolaistrasse 6-10
D-04109 Leipzig
</pre>
</font></span></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Lingtyp mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.<wbr>org</a><br>
<a href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://listserv.linguistlist.<wbr>org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>