<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>
      <style>
<!--
 /* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Courier New";
        panose-1:2 7 3 9 2 2 5 2 4 4;
        mso-font-charset:0;
        mso-generic-font-family:auto;
        mso-font-pitch:variable;
        mso-font-signature:-536859905 -1073711037 9 0 511 0;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
        mso-font-charset:0;
        mso-generic-font-family:auto;
        mso-font-pitch:variable;
        mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}
 /* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {mso-style-unhide:no;
        mso-style-qformat:yes;
        mso-style-parent:"";
        margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman";
        mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
        mso-bidi-font-family:"Courier New";}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        mso-default-props:yes;
        mso-fareast-font-family:"MS 明朝";
        mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
        mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
        mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;
        mso-header-margin:.5in;
        mso-footer-margin:.5in;
        mso-paper-source:0;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
-->
</style>
    </p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
        style="mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-family:
        "Times New Roman""><br>
      </span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
        style="mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-family:
        "Times New Roman"">I am in general reluctant to
        participate in online
        discussions, where the need to be succinct seems too often to
        lead to a genre
        where rhetoric -- analyses are "obviously" correct -- replaces
        argumentation.
        But Jeff Siegel's initial post seemed to address me directly,
        whether or not by
        intention. And Jeff Heath [JH]'s post suggests to me that
        something useful may
        come out of all this. But I really would advise those interested
        in the issue
        to read Comrie (2006), where I go into more detail.</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
        style="mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-family:
        "Times New Roman""> </span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
        style="mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-family:
        "Times New Roman"">Regarding Coast Tsimshian: Matthew
        Dryer [MD] subtly but
        perhaps crucially reformulates the WALS definition of the
        relative pronoun
        strategy (which is also the one I have used elsewhere). The WALS
        definition
        requires the elements to be pronouns, while MD simply requires
        them to be
        words. So two questions arise. The first is whether or not the
        Coast Tsimshian elements
        in question are pronouns. My conclusion was that I could not
        unequivocally
        characterize them as such; the same would, incidentally, be the
        case with
        English "that" introducing relative clauses. The second is
        whether
        the definition restricted to pronouns is better than the one
        that includes all
        words. I don't have a clear answer to this, and it may depend in
        part on one's
        purpose. But if one extends the WALS definition to encompass not
        only pronouns
        but rather all words, then why not extend it to all elements
        that encode the
        grammatical relation/semantic role of the nucleus within the
        relative clause,
        including affixes? This would then include verb marking, whereby
        the verb
        morphology shows the position relativized, but crucially not
        just as part of
        the language's general voice system; I discuss this in Comrie
        (2006: 145-151).
        It may be that we are faced with a scale of degrees of
        similarity to the
        relative pronoun strategy (as defined by WALS), and that we may
        simply have to
        admit this (while taking practical decisions based on the
        current purpose).</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
        style="mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-family:
        "Times New Roman""> </span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
        style="mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-family:
        "Times New Roman"">Regarding Koyra Chiini: Perhaps not
        surprisingly, since my
        discussion in Comrie (2006) is based exclusively on JH's work,
        my reservations
        concerning identifying the element "kaa" as a pronoun that can
        be
        governed by a postposition are along the lines set out in JH's
        post, though
        obviously his firsthand data and analysis are more
        authoritative. I hope, though,
        that my comment here will help to dispel the myth that all
        typologists rush in
        where angels fear to tread.</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
        style="mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-family:
        "Times New Roman""> </span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
        style="mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-family:
        "Times New Roman"">Reference</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
        style="mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-family:
        "Times New Roman""> </span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
        style="mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-family:
        "Times New Roman"">Comrie, B. 2006. Syntactic
        typology: just how exotic ARE
        European-type relative clauses? In Ricardo Mairal and Juana Gil
        (eds.): <i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal">Linguistic
          Universals</i>, 130-154.
        Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</span><span
        style="mso-bidi-font-size:
        12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New
        Roman";color:black;mso-ansi-language:
        EN-GB" lang="EN-GB"></span></p>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2018/3/26 08:16, Heath Jeffrey
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:DM5PR03MB338876FE94033B1FCE54D035BDAD0@DM5PR03MB3388.namprd03.prod.outlook.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
      <div id="divtagdefaultwrapper"
style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;"
        dir="ltr">
        <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">I'm afraid that the
          discussion of Koyra Chiini relatives confirms my doubts about
          the value of crosslinguistic coding into a handful of values
          for each feature.</p>
        <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><br>
        </p>
        <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">Yes, Koyra Chiini has a
          relative-clause initial morpheme (KCh
          <i>kaa</i>) that gaps the coindexed NP ("headNP [Rel…[gap]…")
          and usually attracts postpositions and if so gaps the PP
          ("headNP [Rel-Postp…[gap]…"). However, resumptive PPs are also
          possible ("headN [Rel…[3Sg/3Pl Postp]…]"). Non-3rd person
          heads (unlike 3rd persons) are optionally resumed even in
          subject position: ("you(headNP) [Rel you…]" meaning 'you
          who…'). The only
          <u>pre</u>position, instrumental-comitative <i>nda</i>,
          cannot precede the relative morpheme (# headNP [[<i>nda</i>
          Rel]…]]), instead it remains in place with a resumptive
          pronoun, or it encliticizes to the Rel morpheme in the fashion
          of English
          <i>where-to/of/upon</i>… . </p>
        <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><br>
        </p>
        <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">The major question is
          whether the KCh Rel morpheme is a "pronoun" as opposed to an
          invariant '<span style="font-size: 12pt;">that/when…'</span><span
            style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span><span style="font-size:
            12pt;">complementizer
          </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">or a pluralizable </span><span
            style="font-size: 12pt;">relative noun. In Koyra Chiini,
          </span><i style="font-size: 12pt;">kaa</i><span
            style="font-size: 12pt;"> can be either a relative morpheme
            with the limited (pro-)nominal features mentioned above, or
            a 'that/when…' complementizer, and some textual occurrences
            can be read (or at least translated) either way</span><span
            style="font-size: 12pt;">. In other Songhay languages, the
            corresponding morpheme can function as either a 'that/when…'
            complementizer or a nominal relative morpheme</span><span
            style="font-size: 12pt;">. In the latter function, it
            optionally takes the</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> nominal </span><span
            style="font-size: 12pt;">plural suffix, e.g. Koyraboro Senni
          </span><i style="font-size: 12pt;">kaŋ</i><span
            style="font-size: 12pt;"> with optional indefinite plural
          </span><i style="font-size: 12pt;">kaŋ-yaŋ</i><span
            style="font-size: 12pt;">. Since a head NP (with obligatory
            number marking) is normally present, the option to
            (redundantly) pluralize the relative morpheme is only
            occasionally implemented, but KS </span><i style="font-size:
            12pt;">kaŋ</i><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> is
            clearly noun-like rather than pronoun-like. As in KCh it can
            also be an invariant 'that/when' complementizer. Songhay
            languages  vary as to whether a coindexed clause-internal
            nonsubject NP is realized as a gap, as a pronoun with full
            person/number marking, or as an invariant "3Sg" pronominal. </span></p>
        <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><span style="font-size:
            12pt;"></span></p>
        <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><span style="font-size:
            12pt;"><br>
          </span></p>
        <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><span style="font-size:
            12pt;">As a grammarian I regularly wince at
            typological codings, even if packaged as humble "comparative
            concepts," and I question the value of world-wide
            typological distributions based on them. By the way, the
            situation is worse with "internally-headed relatives."</span></p>
      </div>
      <hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
      <div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font style="font-size:11pt"
          face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000"><b>From:</b>
          Lingtyp <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:lingtyp-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org"><lingtyp-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org></a> on
          behalf of Martin Haspelmath <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:haspelmath@shh.mpg.de"><haspelmath@shh.mpg.de></a><br>
          <b>Sent:</b> Monday, March 26, 2018 9:56:54 AM<br>
          <b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org">lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a><br>
          <b>Subject:</b> Re: [Lingtyp] Relativization</font>
        <div> </div>
      </div>
      <div style="background-color:#FFFFFF">I wouldn't say that the
        Koyra Chiini form is "arguably" a relative pronoun, because it's
        a question of definition, not of argumentation. (People
        sometimes say that they "disagree" with terminological choices,
        but I think the verbs "adopt" or "reject" are better suited when
        it comes to talking about other people's terminological
        choices.)<br>
        <br>
        As Matthew noted earlier, in the WALS chapter by Comrie &
        Kuteva, the "relative pronoun strategy" is clearly defined as
        one involving an element that can be flagged for its syntactic
        role (" a clause-initial pronominal element [which] is
        case-marked (by case or by an adposition) to indicate the role
        of the head noun within the relative clause",
        <a class="x_moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwals.info%2Fchapter%2F122&data=02%7C01%7C%7C40c053f747114afaa68e08d593228d9d%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636576698970504650&sdata=nfxhM5cq6o8PawPAbTUj8vKScG3tVMZtb0P%2FX3Q8XRM%3D&reserved=0"
          originalsrc="http://wals.info/chapter/122"
shash="qldL8ID1+ex8u1DppoO5ccMfKJnSOqdknFxfH+eQfWfuMXleuolGScWMZJAdJi0TYmFJv5ZE2rJfnVN6KD2hjrQ0V7hqQ4Nzo8nCuabhwL5kRY53X/Kr6jfp9c8QD4ubPeCzLdHXSUNLfeYWz2nLH+GLEU9+KNUH8WgEGS6mEvo="
          moz-do-not-send="true">
          http://wals.info/chapter/122</a>).<br>
        <br>
        Likewise, in the APiCS chapter by Michaelis et al., <span
          class="x_c26">"a relative-clause marker is regarded as a
          relative pronoun if it has different subject and object forms
          ..., or if it can be combined with an adposition</span>" (<a
          class="x_moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapics-online.info%2Fparameters%2F92.chapter.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7C40c053f747114afaa68e08d593228d9d%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636576698970504650&sdata=dqOqRJlsfFb36jC%2BG%2BhS027m81Ciw1%2FWobvpiLxE0XY%3D&reserved=0"
originalsrc="http://apics-online.info/parameters/92.chapter.html"
shash="Jb+ymqUswrGzpZ1QD28PrsXl07psRNfBPMGeY8oL8cIYseFrnnC1gENlx2Cy9ogkNWUECfXPGZwkTwFRYA+nPSQTKrXN7t79uW0Q3YcZtsGqhcRyWAHeZQuV8/SsLnVyVtRCC3JCUKDZfFDtxS8rHRV3XgnrUL8CXoDOCxe5TlE="
          moz-do-not-send="true">http://apics-online.info/parameters/92.chapter.html</a>).<br>
        <br>
        Because of these authoritative uses, I would reject (but not
        argue against) a terminological use (in typology) according to
        which relative pronouns are said to include relativizers that
        vary for ("pronominal") features like gender and/or number but
        do not indicate syntactic role. (And if there were an "IPA of
        morphosyntax", as suggested <a
href="https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdlc.hypotheses.org%2F1000&data=02%7C01%7C%7C40c053f747114afaa68e08d593228d9d%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636576698970504650&sdata=vwjM8PkJzdNs05Cq7hi3lI5jMEE9UeKxCn8%2FyAv1U0k%3D&reserved=0"
          originalsrc="https://dlc.hypotheses.org/1000"
shash="sk5oKzXmXJpqPNvmgBrxv5EimVpU21czSYLce1QIE5/M8mUtJmeG5IahiA2h01Wg/SnnKnYJGpDpbpz89uhaYo2PrMnbcP6XZlqiyrPLNN+WtAgBO2OcKcSn9pWVH9WGbZVl1XTUmoInc750ab+W1w2UWUNSnrRzXbt/N9rtN28="
          moz-do-not-send="true">
          here</a>, it should have the same meaning as in the WALS and
        APiCS chapters.)<br>
        <br>
        Thus, from a typological point of view, the relativizers of
        Koyra Chiini and Coast Tsimshian are clearly relative pronouns.<br>
        <br>
        Martin<br>
        <br>
        <div class="x_moz-cite-prefix">On 26.03.18 15:27, Dryer, Matthew
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <style>
<!--
@font-face
        {font-family:"MS 明朝"}
@font-face
        {font-family:"MS 明朝"}
@font-face
        {}
p.x_MsoNormal, li.x_MsoNormal, div.x_MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman"}
.x_MsoChpDefault
        {}
@page WordSection1
        {margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in}
div.x_WordSection1
        {}
-->
</style>
          <div>
            <p class="x_MsoNormal">In Koyra Chiini (Heath 1999: 192),
              the relative word is arguably a relative pronoun since it
              can occur with a postposition.</p>
            <p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
            <p class="x_MsoNormal">Coast Tsimshian has a construction
              which could be analysed as involving a relative pronoun in
              that relative clauses are marked with a word that varies
              for the grammatical relation of the head in the relative
              clause,
              <i>gu</i> if it is the A,<i> in</i> if it is the S or P
              (Mulder 1994: 142).</p>
            <p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
            <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Heath,
                Jeffrey. (1999) <i>A grammar of Koyra Chiini: The
                  Songhay of Timbuktu</i>. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.</span></p>
            <p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
            <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Mulder,
                Jean Gail. (1994) <i>
                  Ergativity in Coast Tsimshian (Sm’algyax)</i>.
                Berkeley: University of California Press.</span></p>
            <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <span style="font-size:11.0pt">Matthew</span>    </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
            <div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt;
              text-align:left; color:black; border-bottom:medium none;
              border-left:medium none; padding-bottom:0in;
              padding-left:0in; padding-right:0in; border-top:#b5c4df
              1pt solid; border-right:medium none; padding-top:3pt">
              <span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>Lingtyp <<a
                href="mailto:lingtyp-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org"
                moz-do-not-send="true">lingtyp-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>>
              on behalf of Bernard Comrie <<a
                href="mailto:comrie@linguistics.ucsb.edu"
                moz-do-not-send="true">comrie@linguistics.ucsb.edu</a>><br>
              <span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Monday, March
              26, 2018 at 3:40 AM<br>
              <span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>"<a
                href="mailto:lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org"
                moz-do-not-send="true">lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>"
              <<a href="mailto:lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org"
                moz-do-not-send="true">lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>><br>
              <span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re:
              [Lingtyp] Relativization<br>
            </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>
              <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
                <p>
                  <style>
<!--
@font-face
        {font-family:"Courier New"}
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math"}
p.x_MsoNormal, li.x_MsoNormal, div.x_MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman"}
.x_MsoChpDefault
        {font-size:10.0pt}
@page WordSection1
        {margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in}
div.x_WordSection1
        {}
-->
</style></p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-GB">Dear
                    Jeff:</span></p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-GB">Some
                    thoughts on your post.</span></p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-GB">The
                    chapters in WALS are necessarily very brief, so
                    often it will be necessary to look at other
                    literature.</span></p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-GB">As
                    many people have noted, including me back in an
                    early publication on European-type relative clauses
                    (Comrie 1998: 79), the European-type relative clause
                    has recently (e.g. through colonialism) spread
                    through contact to languages outside Europe. These
                    are of course not independent instances of the
                    development of this kind of relative clause.</span></p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-GB">I
                    went into somewhat more detail on possible
                    independent candidates for European-type relative
                    clauses in Comrie (2006). If you compare this
                    article with WALS, please note that the publication
                    details are misleading; some points discussed in the
                    2006 article that came up during preparatory work on
                    WALS did not find their way into the final version
                    of WALS.</span></p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-GB">Regarding
                    your specific question on Acoma: I'll need to check,
                    as I don't have the relevant data immediately to
                    hand.</span></p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-GB">Best,</span></p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-GB">Bernard</span></p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-GB">References</span></p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-GB">Comrie,
                    B. 1998. </span>Rethinking the typology of relative
                  clauses.
                  <i style="">Language Design</i> 1: 59-86.</p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
                <p class="x_MsoNormal">Comrie, B. 2006. Syntactic
                  typology: just how exotic ARE European-type relative
                  clauses? In Ricardo Mairal and Juana Gil (eds.):
                  <i style="">Linguistic Universals</i>, 130-154.
                  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<span style=""
                    lang="EN-GB"></span></p>
                <br>
                <br>
                <div class="x_moz-cite-prefix">On 2018/3/18 17:26, Jeff
                  Siegel wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <style>
<!--
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math"}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri}
p.x_MsoNormal, li.x_MsoNormal, div.x_MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif}
a:x_link, span.x_MsoHyperlink
        {color:#0563C1;
        text-decoration:underline}
a:x_visited, span.x_MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {color:#954F72;
        text-decoration:underline}
span.x_EmailStyle17
        {font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext}
span.x_msoIns
        {text-decoration:underline;
        color:teal}
.x_MsoChpDefault
        {font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif}
@page WordSection1
        {margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt}
div.x_WordSection1
        {}
-->
</style>
                  <div class="x_WordSection1">
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt" lang="EN-AU">Greetings:</span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt" lang="EN-AU"> </span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt">In the description of
                        relativization in WALS (features 122A and 123A),
                        the relative pronoun strategy is shown to stand
                        out “as
                      </span><span style="font-size:11.0pt">being
                        typically European since it is not found in
                        Indo-European languages spoken outside Europe,
                        and is exceptional more generally outside
                        Europe” (Comrie & Kuteva 2013). This
                        strategy is defined as follows:</span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt">“</span><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt">[T]he position
                        relativized is indicated inside the relative
                        clause by means of a clause-initial pronominal
                        element, and this pronominal element is
                        case-marked (by case or by an adposition) to
                        indicate the role of the head noun within the
                        relative clause.” (Comrie & Kuteva 2013)</span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt">The only language
                        outside the European area shown to use this
                        strategy is Acoma, Keresan language of New
                        Mexico.
                      </span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt">Could anyone lead me to
                        examples of the relative pronoun strategy used
                        in other languages outside Europe? Also, could
                        anyone provide such examples from Acoma or
                        related languages? (I can’t seem to find any in
                        the descriptions of Keresan languages that I
                        have examined.)</span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt">Reference:</span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt">Bernard Comrie, Tania
                        Kuteva. 2013. Relativization on Subjects. In:
                        Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin
                        (eds.).
                        <i>The World Atlas of Language Structures
                          Online.</i> Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for
                        Evolutionary Anthropology. <br>
                        (Available online at <a
                          class="x_moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwals.info%2Fchapter%2F122&data=02%7C01%7C%7C40c053f747114afaa68e08d593228d9d%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636576698970504650&sdata=nfxhM5cq6o8PawPAbTUj8vKScG3tVMZtb0P%2FX3Q8XRM%3D&reserved=0"
                          originalsrc="http://wals.info/chapter/122"
shash="qldL8ID1+ex8u1DppoO5ccMfKJnSOqdknFxfH+eQfWfuMXleuolGScWMZJAdJi0TYmFJv5ZE2rJfnVN6KD2hjrQ0V7hqQ4Nzo8nCuabhwL5kRY53X/Kr6jfp9c8QD4ubPeCzLdHXSUNLfeYWz2nLH+GLEU9+KNUH8WgEGS6mEvo="
                          moz-do-not-send="true">
                          http://wals.info/chapter/122</a>, Accessed on
                        2018-03-19.) </span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt">Many thanks,</span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt">Thanks,</span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt">Jeff</span></p>
                    <div style="border:none; border-bottom:dotted
                      windowtext 3.0pt; padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">
                      <p class="x_MsoNormal" style="border:none;
                        padding:0cm"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
                    </div>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt">Emeritus Professor Jeff
                        Siegel</span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt">Linguistics, School of
                        Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences</span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt">University of New
                        England</span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt">Armidale, NSW 2351</span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt">Australia</span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt"><a
href="https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.une.edu.au%2Fstaff-profiles%2Fbcss%2Fjsiegel&data=02%7C01%7C%7C40c053f747114afaa68e08d593228d9d%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636576698970504650&sdata=OEEA1Yuv4vq4QYkJWLKU1RXkccY0L7XZ40dYMV98oiw%3D&reserved=0"
originalsrc="https://www.une.edu.au/staff-profiles/bcss/jsiegel"
shash="Ck7OX34aB2Gh4klfvwFXPXe7IKSnlD2hLzMOvVcyDlG4DtfkQOuLFTtyhQW53D8vIsWa413qOLvof887Udte1Nw7/pVem7lVWWb5tBROM3wiy6z4hwtfJVpRFir7yo6D5SS2qCPbyZ2I6XAVHo2vvAYrIdfvUSCLNK7zTKM14RM="
                          moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.une.edu.au/staff-profiles/bcss/jsiegel</a></span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
                    <p class="x_MsoNormal"><span
                        style="font-size:11.0pt" lang="EN-AU"> </span></p>
                  </div>
                  <br>
                  <fieldset class="x_mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                  <br>
                  <pre>_______________________________________________
Lingtyp mailing list
<a class="x_moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org" moz-do-not-send="true">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a><a class="x_moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flistserv.linguistlist.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flingtyp&data=02%7C01%7C%7C40c053f747114afaa68e08d593228d9d%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636576698970660902&sdata=cgkU4IZGQyYlAHqIh3QLSIf%2Fkb68faNKZGfC8KJ5ITg%3D&reserved=0" originalsrc="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp" shash="JxPXnfu9QAVnYkvDs3PRgn9sUE47IdZHyDgqvYxCGkPOCnyb07Pn5knaLHOXPSeglD8XoUIFXHQn/EqbjYr24Y/c0UO9dHX4ewhqoXHTNIU6BYtN9YDe1SIYhpABBqDyNwKcA6PGAMOf8yW84srEF02AJkAJ2VOT8T+mui3uC/Q=" moz-do-not-send="true">http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a></pre>
                </blockquote>
                <br>
                <pre class="x_moz-signature" cols="72">-- 

Bernard Comrie
Distinguished Faculty Professor of Linguistics, University of California Santa Barbara

E-mail: comrie at linguistics.ucsb.edu
Web site: <a class="x_moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linguistics.ucsb.edu%2Fpeople%2Fbernard-comrie&data=02%7C01%7C%7C40c053f747114afaa68e08d593228d9d%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636576698970660902&sdata=7jNAFRlryIH3yyCNxixs%2FSmEBGUA1VYq1sCtuzpuA2o%3D&reserved=0" originalsrc="http://www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/people/bernard-comrie" shash="gqsTp2WsGQFD33/tNYEv4qAHSKneRoYGT7+gTVKT/R/9EDSKF16aQH1iHeB6Xuk+VSzzB152Rpc0e1xlq9Ef9nKJ7Gk/zCpOVBe4pyQRpLenOsPbop2m0zQw8kHe9Sin1rjoXON939vi9Fwv5a2ZaKB+MQu1Gv3+kkOy7Xz44bQ=" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/people/bernard-comrie</a>

Department of Linguistics
University of California, Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara, CA 93106-3100
USA
</pre>
              </div>
            </div>
          </span><br>
          <fieldset class="x_mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
          <br>
          <pre>_______________________________________________
Lingtyp mailing list
<a class="x_moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org" moz-do-not-send="true">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>
<a class="x_moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flistserv.linguistlist.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flingtyp&data=02%7C01%7C%7C40c053f747114afaa68e08d593228d9d%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636576698970660902&sdata=cgkU4IZGQyYlAHqIh3QLSIf%2Fkb68faNKZGfC8KJ5ITg%3D&reserved=0" originalsrc="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp" shash="JxPXnfu9QAVnYkvDs3PRgn9sUE47IdZHyDgqvYxCGkPOCnyb07Pn5knaLHOXPSeglD8XoUIFXHQn/EqbjYr24Y/c0UO9dHX4ewhqoXHTNIU6BYtN9YDe1SIYhpABBqDyNwKcA6PGAMOf8yW84srEF02AJkAJ2VOT8T+mui3uC/Q=" moz-do-not-send="true">http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a>
</pre>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        <pre class="x_moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Martin Haspelmath (<a class="x_moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:haspelmath@shh.mpg.de" moz-do-not-send="true">haspelmath@shh.mpg.de</a>)
Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History
Kahlaische Strasse 10   
D-07745 Jena  
&
Leipzig University 
IPF 141199
Nikolaistrasse 6-10
D-04109 Leipzig    





</pre>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Lingtyp mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp">http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 

Bernard Comrie
Distinguished Faculty Professor of Linguistics, University of California Santa Barbara

E-mail: comrie at linguistics.ucsb.edu
Web site: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/people/bernard-comrie">http://www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/people/bernard-comrie</a>

Department of Linguistics
University of California, Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara, CA 93106-3100
USA
</pre>
  </body>
</html>