<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1258">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;" dir="ltr">
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">Hi David</p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">Sorry to butt in late, but I can't see how a list of important literature on clitics can omit
<span class="st"><span class="st">Stephen Anderson</span>'s 2005 book Aspects of the Theory of Clitics.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><span class="st"><br>
</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><span class="st">best</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><span class="st">Bill Palmer<em></em></span><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><br>
</p>
<div id="Signature">
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" dir="ltr" style="font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif,"EmojiFont","Apple Color Emoji","Segoe UI Emoji",NotoColorEmoji,"Segoe UI Symbol","Android Emoji",EmojiSymbols;">
<p style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0"></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="_MailAutoSig" id="LPNoLP"><span style="">Dr Bill Palmer</span></a><span style=""><span style=""><br>
</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style=""><span style="">Director</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style=""><span style="">Endangered Languages Documentation, Theory</span></span><span style=""><span style=""><br>
</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style=""><span style=""> and Application Research Program</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style=""><span style="">HASS, FEDUA</span></span><span style=""><span style=""><br>
</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style=""><span style="">University of Newcastle</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style=""><span style="">Callaghan NSW 2308</span></span><a href="mailto:bill.palmer@newcastle.edu.au" id="LPNoLP"><span style=""><span style="color:blue"><br>
</span></span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="mailto:bill.palmer@newcastle.edu.au" id="LPNoLP"><span style=""><span style="color:blue">bill.palmer@newcastle.edu.au</span></span><span style=""></span></a><span style=""><span style=""></span></span>
</p>
</div>
<p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Lingtyp <lingtyp-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org> on behalf of David Inman <davinman@uw.edu><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, 11 April 2018 6:39:16 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Lingtyp] Keystone literature on clitic vs suffix distinction</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Thanks to everyone who replied to me. For others looking into the phenomenon, here is a list of the most-recommended papers:
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>Zwicky and Pullum. 1983. Cliticization vs. Inflection: English n't</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. Indeterminacy of word segmentation</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34); font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:13px; font-style:normal; font-weight:400; letter-spacing:normal; text-align:left; text-indent:0px; text-transform:none; white-space:normal; word-spacing:0px; background-color:rgb(255,255,255); float:none; display:inline">Bermúdez-Otero,
Ricardo, and John Payne. 2011. There are no special clitics.
<div style="color:rgb(34,34,34); font-family:arial,sans-serif; font-size:small; font-style:normal; font-weight:400; letter-spacing:normal; text-align:start; text-indent:0px; text-transform:none; white-space:normal; word-spacing:0px; background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">
<br class="x_gmail-Apple-interchange-newline">
Spencer, A. and Luiìs, A. 2012. The canonical clitic, chapter form Canonical morphology and syntax.</div>
</span></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Haspelmath, Martin. 2015. Defining vs. diagnosing linguistic categories: A case study of clitic phenomena.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Tallman, Adam. 2017. There are no special clitics in Chácobo (Pano)</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="x_gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
<div>
<div class="x_gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="font-size:small"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-size:small">David Inman</div>
<div style="font-size:small">PhD Candidate</div>
<div style="font-size:small">University of Washington Linguistics</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="x_gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 12:38 PM, David Inman <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:davinman@uw.edu" target="_blank">davinman@uw.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="x_gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:1px #ccc solid; padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">I am working on a paper that is related to the distinction between affixes and clitics and want to make sure I have covered the key literature. What are the cornerstones covering the clitic/affix distinction that folks would recommend I start
with?<span class="x_HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br clear="all">
<div>
<div class="x_m_9143957113778752699gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="x_m_9143957113778752699gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="font-size:small"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-size:small">David Inman</div>
<div style="font-size:small">PhD Candidate</div>
<div style="font-size:small">University of Washington Linguistics</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>