<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    A "pan-dialectal" grammar written by a prominent author (former ALT
    president) that you may want to have a look at is:<br>
    <br>
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
      charset=ISO-8859-1">
    <div class="csl-bib-body" style="line-height: 1.35; margin-left:
      2em; text-indent:-2em;">
      <div class="csl-entry">Evans, Nicholas D. 2003. <i>Bininj
          Gun-wok: A pan-dialectal grammar of Mayali, Kunwinjku and
          Kune. 2 vols</i>. (Pacific Linguistics, 541). Canberra:
        Australian National University.</div>
      <span class="Z3988"
title="url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fzotero.org%3A2&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&rft.genre=book&rft.btitle=Bininj%20Gun-wok%3A%20A%20pan-dialectal%20grammar%20of%20Mayali%2C%20Kunwinjku%20and%20Kune.%202%20vols&rft.place=Canberra&rft.publisher=Australian%20National%20University&rft.series=Pacific%20Linguistics%2C%20541&rft.aufirst=Nicholas%20D.&rft.aulast=Evans&rft.au=Nicholas%20D.%20Evans&rft.date=2003"></span></div>
    <br>
    I have no particular recommendation, but personally, I like the idea
    of colour coding – I think it's used much less than it could in
    technical texts (probably for reasons of typographic conservatism,
    not because there are serious functional considerations that speak
    against it).<br>
    <br>
    Martin<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15.06.18 15:02, Rasmus Bernander
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CABGkUX7rMMbNhq+0L6-KvAdJbo0UoqydEp92f6PO4UHq4JfPMA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=ISO-8859-1">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <p style="margin:0px 0px 10.66px"><span style="margin:0px"
            lang="EN-US"><font size="3" color="#000000" face="Calibri">Dear
              members
              of the Lingtyp list,</font></span></p>
        <p style="margin:0px 0px 10.66px"><span style="margin:0px"
            lang="EN-US"><font face="Calibri"><font size="3"><font
                  color="#000000">I’m
                  currently involved in a project called “Linguistic
                  Variation as an Indicator of
                  Historical Relations and Language Contact: A
                  Comparative grammar of four Mara
                  Bantu languages (Tanzania)”. The project is funded by
                  Koneen Säätiö and led by
                  Dr. Lotta Aunio, Department of Languages, University
                  of Helsinki. As implied in
                  the title, the project aims at offering a linguistic
                  description of four
                  closely related (yet structurally versatile) Bantu
                  varieties, Ikoma, Nata,
                  Isenye and Ngoreme (known collectively as the Western
                  Serengeti languages).<span style="margin:0px">  </span>More
                  information about the project can be
                  found at this homepage: </font><span
                  style="margin:0px"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="https://blogs.helsinki.fi/mara-project/"><font
                      color="#0563c1">https://blogs.helsinki.fi/mara-project/</font></a></span></font></font></span></p>
        <p style="margin:0px 0px 10.66px"><font face="Calibri"><font
              size="3"><span style="margin:0px" lang="EN-US"><font
                  color="#000000">We are
                  struggling a bit with the question about the ideal way
                  of designing the
                  linguistic description. We would like to ask you
                  ”Humans who read grammars”,
                  i.e. you researchers who make typological (and/or
                  comparative and/or specific
                  theoretical) work and thus have great experience in
                  reading grammars as well as
                  extracting information from grammars: What would you
                  consider being the most
                  helpful and straightforward way to organize the
                  structure of a multilectal
                  grammar of this kind?</font></span><span
                style="margin:0px;color:black" lang="EN-US"> We would
                prefer to find a way to systemize the data
                in a manner where we don’t have to prioritize one
                variety over the others and
                where we can also present the subsystems of the non-main
                varieties in a
                coherent way.</span><span style="margin:0px"
                lang="EN-US"><font color="#000000"> It seems
                  that some grammars use color/symbol coding for
                  different varieties. Do you
                  consider that helpful? Or do you have other, similar
                  ideas on how one would
                  succeed in creating a really clear and comprehensible
                  comparative grammar?</font></span></font></font></p>
        <p style="margin:0px 0px 10.66px"><span style="margin:0px"
            lang="EN-US"><font size="3" color="#000000" face="Calibri">Many
              thanks
              in advance!</font></span></p>
        <p style="margin:0px 0px 10.66px"><span style="margin:0px"
            lang="EN-US"><font size="3" color="#000000" face="Calibri">/Rasmus
              Bernander</font></span></p>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Lingtyp mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp">http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>