<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=gb2312">
</head>
<body>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
>On the other hand, I'm guessing that a human-like statue could never take iru (is this correct?)<br>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
I just googled the phrase "ã~Ïñ¤¬¤¤¤ë" /do:.zo:.ga i.ru/ 'There is a statue' and it yields many results. So it seems that a (human-like) statue can in fact take iru.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
>From Hong Kong,<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
Ian Joo<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
<a href="http://ianjoo.academia.edu">http://ianjoo.academia.edu</a><br>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
<b><font color="#000000">From:</font></b><font color="#000000"> Lingtyp <lingtyp-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org> on behalf of David Gil <gil@shh.mpg.de></font><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
<font color="#000000"><b>Sent:</b></font><font color="#000000"> Tuesday, November 27, 2018 3:27:28 AM</font><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
<font color="#000000"><b>To:</b></font><font color="#000000"> lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</font><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
<font color="#000000"><b>Subject:</b></font><font color="#000000"> [Lingtyp] animacy hierarchy: exceptions based on shape</font>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
I am looking for examples of exceptions to the animacy hierarchy that are motivated by the shape or other spatial configurational properties of the relevant referents.<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
The animacy hierarchy is primarily of an ontological nature; shape doesn't usually matter. A slug is animate even though its shape is ill-defined and amorphous, while a stone statue is inanimate even if it represents an identifiable person.
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
What would such a shape-based exception to the animacy hierachy look like? In Japanese (according to Wikipedia, I hope this is right), there are two verbs of existence,
<i>iru</i> for animates, <i>aru</i> for inanimates, but <i>robotto</i> ('robot') can occur with either of the two: while
<i>iru</i> entails "emphasis on its human-like behavior", <i>aru</i> entails "emphasis on its status as a nonliving thing". This description seems to suggest that it's the robot's sentience that is of relevance, not its human shape: presumably, even if the
robot assumed the form of a sphere with blinking lights, if its behaviour were sufficiently humanlike it could take
<i>iru</i> (speakers of Japanese: is this correct?). On the other hand, I'm guessing that a human-like statue could never take
<i>iru </i>(is this correct?). So if my factual assumptions about Japanese are correct, the distribution of
<i>iru</i> and <i>aru</i> does not offer a shape-based exception to the animacy hierarchy. A bona-fide shape-based exception to the animacy hierarchy would be one in which all human-shaped objects ¡ª robots, dolls, statues, whatever ¡ª behaved like humans with
respect to the relevant grammatical property. Or conversely, a case in which an animate being that somehow managed to assume the form of a typical inanimate object would be treated as inanimate.<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
I would like to claim that such shape-based exceptions to the animacy hierarchy simply do not exist, but I am running this past the collective knowledge of LINGTYP members first, to make sure I'm not missing out on anything.<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
More generally, it seems to be the case that grammar doesn't really care much about shapes. The closest thing to grammaticalized shape that I can think of is numeral classifiers, which typically refer to categories such as "elongated object", "small compact
object", and so forth. But these straddle the boundary between grammar and lexicon, and, more importantly, are typically organized paradigmatically, rather than hierarchically, as is the case for animacy categories. -- David Gil Department of Linguistic and
Cultural Evolution Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History Kahlaische Strasse 10, 07745 Jena, Germany Email:
<a href="mailto:gil@shh.mpg.de">gil@shh.mpg.de</a> Office Phone (Germany): +49-3641686834 Mobile Phone (Indonesia): +62-81281162816
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>