<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Dear David,<br>
    </p>
    <p>Shouldn't "descriptive" be rather referred to as "philological"
      or "pre-theoretical" in that parlance? :-) It seems that these two
      words also belong into this thread. <br>
    </p>
    <p>Best,</p>
    <p>Ilja<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 12.02.2020 um 11:32 schrieb David
      Gil:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:ea1225d2-40aa-05b7-a7d9-df9a189f896e@shh.mpg.de">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <p>There is also the use of "theoretical" as a would-be antonym to
        "descriptive" — with the latter often preceded by words such as
        "just" or "merely", in order to reinforce the assumption that
        being "theoretical" is somehow a higher or more worthy endeavor
        than being "descriptive".  Since it is clearly impossible to
        describe any aspect of language without adopting some kind of
        theory (e.g. with regard to such basic stuff as what constitutes
        a segment when you're transcribing a text), the presupposition
        that theory stands in opposition to description is both
        confusing, as suggested by Martin, but also pernicious — the
        latter because it expresses a totalitarian attitude whereby if
        you're not adopting the "right" theory, you're not adopting any
        theory whatsoever.<br>
      </p>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/02/2020 12:38, Eitan Grossman
        wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAA00bN=XgxXfSYS_y32kru=+ajWxVOzWgMzgEWnaag0qAfNqkg@mail.gmail.com">
        <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
          charset=UTF-8">
        <div dir="auto">Hi all,
          <div dir="auto"><br>
            <div dir="auto">In oral comments and reviews, I encounter
              two main uses of "theory" and "theoretical." One is simply
              an autonym of generative linguists, as in "John only hangs
              out with theoretical linguists" or "Mary does great
              fieldwork but we want to hire a theoretician."</div>
            <div dir="auto">You might also encounter something along the
              lines of "This abstract makes some very interesting
              observations but does not reference the theoretical
              literature, and it is unclear how it relates to theory." </div>
            <div dir="auto"><br>
            </div>
            <div dir="auto">The other use is something like "having a
              point (beyond describing facts)" or "referencing general
              linguistic literature." </div>
            <div dir="auto"><br>
            </div>
            <div dir="auto">But in my experience, the first is by far
              the most common.</div>
            <div dir="auto"><br>
            </div>
            <div dir="auto">Eitan</div>
            <div dir="auto"><br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">
          <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">בתאריך יום ג׳, 11 בפבר׳
            2020, 12:16, מאת paolo Ramat ‏<<a
              href="mailto:paolo.ramat@unipv.it" moz-do-not-send="true">paolo.ramat@unipv.it</a>>:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div dir="ltr">Hi everyone,
              <div>Martin H. has written that  <<there is
                confusion also about ]...] the relation between
                "typology" and "theory">>. I fully agree. But
                Martin says further that <<the term "theory" can
                be used as a count noun , or as a mass noun ("linguistic
                theory", "grammatical theory">>. This sounds
                rather strange: I had always thought that mass nouns are
                nouns such as 'sugar', 'blood', 'sand' etc. Can we
                consider abstract nouns like 'philosophy','theology' or
                even 'democracy'  as mass nouns? Let alone by adding an
                adjective as in "linguistic/grammatic theory". This is
                not the habitual use of the term and sounds confusing. </div>
              <div>Paolo</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div dir="ltr" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div>
                        <div dir="ltr">
                          <div>
                            <div dir="ltr">
                              <div>
                                <div dir="ltr">prof. dr. Paolo Ramat
                                  <div>
                                    <div> Università di Pavia (retired)</div>
                                    <div>Istituto Universitario Studi
                                      Superiori (IUSS Pavia) (retired)</div>
                                    <div>Accademia dei Lincei, Socio
                                      corrispondente<br>
                                      <div>'Academia Europaea'</div>
                                      <div>'Societas Linguistica
                                        Europaea', Honorary Member</div>
                                    </div>
                                  </div>
                                  <div>piazzetta Arduino 11 - I 27100
                                    Pavia</div>
                                  <div>##39 0382 27027</div>
                                  <div>347 044 98 44</div>
                                </div>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <br>
              </div>
            </div>
            <br>
            <div class="gmail_quote">
              <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Il giorno mar 11 feb
                2020 alle ore 10:47 Haspelmath, Martin <<a
                  href="mailto:haspelmath@shh.mpg.de" target="_blank"
                  rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">haspelmath@shh.mpg.de</a>>
                ha scritto:<br>
              </div>
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                <div>
                  <div>I would talk about "confusion", not about
                    "abuse", because there are many different kinds of
                    linguistic theories. Moreover, the term "theory" can
                    be used as a count noun (as in the last sentence),
                    or as a mass noun ("linguistic theory", "grammatical
                    theory"). Linguists rarely reflect on kinds of
                    theories, or on kinds of senses of the word
                    "theory", and the papers that Hartmut mentioned have
                    not become well-known. So there is a lot of
                    confusion.<br>
                    <br>
                    In my 2010 paper on "Framework-free grammatical
                    theory" (<a href="https://zenodo.org/record/814947"
                      target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">https://zenodo.org/record/814947</a>),
                    I distinguished four senses of "theory".<br>
                    <br>
                    But there is confusion also about the relation
                    between "typology" and "theory": Quite a few people
                    have contrasted them as if they were different ways
                    of doing linguistics, or different parts of
                    research, e.g.<br>
                    <br>
                    <font size="-1">Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. <em>Non-verbal
                        predication: Theory, typology, diachrony</em>.
                      Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.<br>
                      Polinsky, Maria & Robert Kluender. 2007.
                      Linguistic typology and theory construction:
                      Common challenges ahead. <em>Linguistic Typology</em>
                      11(1). 273–283.<br>
                      Van Langendonck, Willy. 2008. <em>Theory and
                        typology of proper names</em>. Berlin: De
                      Gruyter Mouton.</font><br>
                    <br>
                    But on the other hand, it is clear that
                    "atheoretical typology" is impossible, so this usage
                    is confusing. See this recent blogpost, which
                    proposes an alternative: <a
                      href="https://dlc.hypotheses.org/1915"
                      target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">https://dlc.hypotheses.org/1915</a><br>
                    <br>
                    Martin<br>
                    <br>
                    <br>
                    On 11.02.20 10:18, Hartmut Haberland wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                  <blockquote type="cite">
                    <div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"
                          lang="EN-US">Jün-Tin Wang 1973. ”On the
                          representation of generative grammars as
                          first-order theories.” In: Radu J. Bogdan and
                          Ilkka Niinilouto eds. <i>Logic,</i> <i>Language
                            and Probability</i>. Dordrecht: Reidel,
                          302-316</span></p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"
                          lang="EN-US">Hans-Heinrich Lieb 1974.
                          "Grammars as theories: The case for axiomatic
                          grammar (Part I)". <i>Theoretical Linguistics</i>
                          1: 39-115.</span></p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"
                          lang="EN-US">Hans-Heinrich Lieb 1976.
                          "Grammars as theories: The case for axiomatic
                          grammar (Part II)". </span><i><span
style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"
                            lang="DE-AT">Theoretical Linguistics</span></i><span
style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"
                          lang="DE-AT"> 3: 1-98.</span><span
style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"
                          lang="EN-US"></span></p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"
                          lang="DE-AT"> </span></p>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"
                          lang="DE-AT"> </span></p>
                      <div>
                        <div
style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt
                          solid rgb(225,225,225);padding:3pt 0cm 0cm">
                          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
                                style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Fra:</span></b><span
style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> Hartmut Haberland
                              <a href="mailto:hartmut@ruc.dk"
                                target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
                                moz-do-not-send="true"><hartmut@ruc.dk></a>
                              <br>
                              <b>Sendt:</b> 11. februar 2020 09:33<br>
                              <b>Til:</b> TALLMAN Adam <a
                                href="mailto:Adam.TALLMAN@cnrs.fr"
                                target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
                                moz-do-not-send="true">
                                <Adam.TALLMAN@cnrs.fr></a><br>
                              <b>Emne:</b> Re: [Lingtyp] The (ab)use of
                              the term "theory" in (generative)
                              linguistics</span></p>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Hans-Heinrich
                            Lieb has written extensively about this in
                            the <span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)">7</span>0s,
                            also Jün-tin Wang. </span>Hartmut </p>
                      </div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt"><br>
                          Den 11. feb. 2020 kl. 07.12 skrev TALLMAN Adam
                          <<a href="mailto:Adam.TALLMAN@cnrs.fr"
                            target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
                            moz-do-not-send="true">Adam.TALLMAN@cnrs.fr</a>>:</p>
                      </div>
                      <blockquote
                        style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt">
                        <div>
                          <div>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;color:black">Hello
                                all, </span></p>
                            <div>
                              <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                  style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;color:black"> </span></p>
                            </div>
                            <div>
                              <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                  style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;color:black">Does
                                  anyone have any sources that discuss
                                  the abuse of the term "theory" in
                                  generative linguistics (or in
                                  linguistics generally)? I figure that
                                  a paper like this must exist given the
                                  deeply insightful comments that I have
                                  received by some reviewers.</span></p>
                            </div>
                            <div>
                              <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                  style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;color:black"> </span></p>
                            </div>
                            <div>
                              <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                  style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;color:black">best,</span></p>
                            </div>
                            <div>
                              <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                  style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;color:black"> </span></p>
                            </div>
                            <div>
                              <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                  style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;color:black">Adam</span></p>
                              <div>
                                <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                    style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;color:black"> </span></p>
                                <div>
                                  <div>
                                    <div>
                                      <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                          style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;color:black"> </span></p>
                                    </div>
                                    <div>
                                      <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                          style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;color:black"> </span></p>
                                    </div>
                                    <div>
                                      <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                          style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;color:black"> </span></p>
                                    </div>
                                    <div>
                                      <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                          style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;color:black"> </span></p>
                                    </div>
                                    <div>
                                      <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                          style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;color:black">Adam
                                          James Ross Tallman (PhD, UT
                                          Austin)</span><span
                                          style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;color:black"></span></p>
                                    </div>
                                    <div>
                                      <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;color:black;background:white">ELDP-SOAS
                                          -- Postdoctorant<br>
                                          CNRS -- Dynamique Du Langage
                                          (UMR 5596)<br>
                                          Bureau 207, 14 av. Berthelot,
                                          Lyon (07)</span><span
                                          style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;color:black"></span></p>
                                    </div>
                                    <div>
                                      <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;color:black;background:white">Numero
                                          celular en bolivia:
                                          +59163116867</span><span
                                          style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;color:black"></span></p>
                                    </div>
                                  </div>
                                </div>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </blockquote>
                      <blockquote
                        style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt">
                        <div>
                          <p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
                            Lingtyp mailing list<br>
                            <a
                              href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org"
                              target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
                              moz-do-not-send="true">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a><br>
                            <a
                              href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp"
                              target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
                              moz-do-not-send="true">http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a></p>
                        </div>
                      </blockquote>
                    </div>
                    <br>
                    <fieldset></fieldset>
                    <pre>_______________________________________________
Lingtyp mailing list
<a href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>
<a href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a>
</pre>
                  </blockquote>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <pre cols="72">-- 
Martin Haspelmath (<a href="mailto:haspelmath@shh.mpg.de" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">haspelmath@shh.mpg.de</a>)
Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History
Kahlaische Strasse 10   
D-07745 Jena  
&
Leipzig University
Institut fuer Anglistik 
IPF 141199
D-04081 Leipzig  </pre>
                </div>
                _______________________________________________<br>
                Lingtyp mailing list<br>
                <a href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org"
                  target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a><br>
                <a
                  href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp"
                  rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a><br>
              </blockquote>
            </div>
            _______________________________________________<br>
            Lingtyp mailing list<br>
            <a href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org"
              target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a><br>
            <a
              href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp"
              rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a><br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
        <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
        <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Lingtyp mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org" moz-do-not-send="true">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp" moz-do-not-send="true">http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a>
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
David Gil
 
Senior Scientist (Associate)
Department of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution
Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History
Kahlaische Strasse 10, 07745 Jena, Germany
 
Email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gil@shh.mpg.de" moz-do-not-send="true">gil@shh.mpg.de</a>
Mobile Phone (Israel): +972-556825895
Mobile Phone (Indonesia): +62-81344082091</pre>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Lingtyp mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp">http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Ilja A. Seržant, postdoc
Project "Grammatical Universals"
Universität Leipzig (IPF 141199)
Nikolaistraße 6-10
04109 Leipzig 

URL: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://home.uni-leipzig.de/serzant/">http://home.uni-leipzig.de/serzant/</a>

Tel.: + 49 341 97 37713
Room 5.22</pre>
  </body>
</html>