<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 30.05.20 um 17:55 schrieb Mattis
List:
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:f9a2c81d-4602-8ae5-d97c-f3dd7fd8f763@lingpy.org">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">What I still find problematic is that information on the
direction of the boundary symbols is only implicitly encoded in another
level of the annotation, as you correctly say.</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>I have been thinking about this. One might allow for optional
additional specification of boundary symbols: Wherever a binary
combination of morphs is asymmetric in the sense that one of them
clearly depends on the other (where the concept of morphological
dependency would have to be defined beforehand), it might be
useful for some purposes as yours to add the direction of
dependency to the boundary symbol, like this:</p>
<blockquote>root-»affix<br>
clitic«=word_form</blockquote>
<p>You might also do a preparsing on an interlinearized text that
lacks this specification and add it, on the basis of such
information as I mentioned in my previous post.<br>
</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Christian<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<p style="font-size:90%">Prof. em. Dr. Christian Lehmann<br>
Rudolfstr. 4<br>
99092 Erfurt<br>
<span style="font-variant:small-caps">Deutschland</span></p>
<table style="font-size:80%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Tel.:</td>
<td>+49/361/2113417</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>E-Post:</td>
<td><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:christianw_lehmann@arcor.de">christianw_lehmann@arcor.de</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Web:</td>
<td><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.christianlehmann.eu">https://www.christianlehmann.eu</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</body>
</html>