<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
I agree with Adam Singerman that there's little hope of
reconstructing Proto-Indo-European answers to polar questions.<br>
<br>
As a beautiful illustration of the (likely) influence of a substrate
language, I recommend Vennemann (2009):<br>
<br>
<div class="csl-bib-body" style="line-height: 1.35; margin-left:
2em; text-indent:-2em;">
<div class="csl-entry">Vennemann, Theo. 2009. Celtic influence in
English? Yes and no. <i>English Language & Linguistics</i>
13(2). 309–334. (doi:<a
href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674309003049">10.1017/S1360674309003049</a>)
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.academia.edu/6582604/Celtic_influence_in_English_Yes_and_No">https://www.academia.edu/6582604/Celtic_influence_in_English_Yes_and_No</a><br>
</div>
<span class="Z3988"
title="url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fzotero.org%3A2&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1017%2FS1360674309003049&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Celtic%20influence%20in%20English%3F%20Yes%20and%20no&rft.jtitle=English%20Language%20%26%20Linguistics&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.aufirst=Theo&rft.aulast=Vennemann&rft.au=Theo%20Vennemann&rft.date=2009-07&rft.pages=309-334&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=334&rft.issn=1469-4379%2C%201360-6743&rft.language=en"></span></div>
<br>
This paper argues that English short-sentence answers (of the type
"(yes) I will"), which are rather different from what the the other
Germanic languages have, were calqued from a Celtic substratum. The
fact that Old English is more Germanic-like may seem to go against
this hypotheses, but Vennemann tries to construct a scenario in
which this is compatible with the substratum hypothesis.<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
Martin<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 14.11.21 um 19:48 schrieb Adam
Singerman:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAFZcNW-n6KvBgHuVfzMeWoiEDqV=W1qyDEOxA=mKT6syrkJDBw@mail.gmail.com">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Dear Ion,
Anders Holmberg has a 2016 monograph entitled "The Syntax of Yes and
No." It's couched in a Generative approach but it's still full of data
that may be useful to you! (I have a PDF copy of the book and am happy
to pass it along to you.)
Re: this statement of yours:
"Among the Indo-European languages, some use a dedicated affirmative
particle such as "yes", others don't, using for affirmative answers
the repetition of the verb or of the focused word, or an adverb with
other uses (so, truly, indeed). The variety of forms and constructions
suggests that the parent language didn't have an affirmative
particle."
Unless we have a concrete theory about how answers to questions can
change over time, I don't believe we can infer from the diversity of
affirmative answers in the modern Indo-European languages anything
concrete about how affirmative answers would've worked in Proto-IE.
Plus, how to respond to answers (with repetition of the verb, with a
particle meaning 'yes,' with an adverb that has other uses) seems like
the exact kind of discourse-situated practice that could be expected
to spread in contact scenarios.
All the best,
Adam
_______________________________________________
Lingtyp mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp">http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Martin Haspelmath
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Deutscher Platz 6
D-04103 Leipzig
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.eva.mpg.de/linguistic-and-cultural-evolution/staff/martin-haspelmath/">https://www.eva.mpg.de/linguistic-and-cultural-evolution/staff/martin-haspelmath/</a></pre>
</body>
</html>