<div dir="ltr">Matthew: absolutely.<div>For clarity, I should have stated that I was referring to 'dynamic' applicatives, in which there are two (or more) coding options available; that was what I was thinking about when I wrote '<i style="color:rgb(80,0,80)"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black">valency-rearranging operations</span></i>', and not just valency-adding or subtracting.</div><div>For the languages with no other option, I think it could still be argued that there's more prominence likely to be associated associated with an encoded beneficiary, for instance, since the speaker has made the choice to bother to code it. It is not, however, the same clear contrast that is found in languages with dynamic applicative (or super-applicative, to use Paz Naylor's term for Philippine-type voice) structures.</div><div>Many (other; not Tzutujil) Mayan languages appear to lack root-ditransitive verbs, in that they require the use of the -b'e applicative to encoded the recipient. These would fall into the same basket at Kutenai and Walman.</div><div><br></div><div>-Mark</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 at 15:40, Matthew Dryer <<a href="mailto:dryer@buffalo.edu">dryer@buffalo.edu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="gmail-m_-8829330687252531427WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="m_-8829330687252531427__GoBack"></a>Mark says<span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black">However, every text study of either passives or applicatives, or non-core philippine-type voice choice, shows that there is a degree of pragmatic prominence associated with the use of these
valency-rearranging operations. We might re-phrase the passive and applicative characterisations as<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black">passive promotes pragmatically-prominent object to subject (and demotes initial less-prominent subject to non-core)<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black">applicative promotes pragmatically-prominent (oblique?) to object (might demote initial (less-prominent?) object to non-core)<u></u><u></u></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">However, there are applicatives which are "obligatory" for a given semantic type. In one lg I work on, Ktunaxa, all applicatives are obligatory in the sense that the only way to express a benefactive, instrumental, or comitative is to use
the relevant applicative. In Walman, the only way to express a benefactive is to use the applicative. Since they are obligatory, there really isn't any pragmatic prominence associated with these applicatives.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Matthew<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div style="border-style:solid none none;border-top-width:1pt;border-top-color:rgb(181,196,223);padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">From: </span></b><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">Mark Donohue <<a href="mailto:mhdonohue@gmail.com" target="_blank">mhdonohue@gmail.com</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Monday, February 21, 2022 at 10:24 PM<br>
<b>To: </b>David Gil <<a href="mailto:gil@shh.mpg.de" target="_blank">gil@shh.mpg.de</a>><br>
<b>Cc: </b>Matthew Dryer <<a href="mailto:dryer@buffalo.edu" target="_blank">dryer@buffalo.edu</a>>, "<a href="mailto:lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org" target="_blank">lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org" target="_blank">lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [Lingtyp] query: instrument voice<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi David,<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">The issue, as I see it, is what we mean by 'promote'.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">We can agree that<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">passive promotes object to subject (and demotes initial subject to non-core)<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">applicative promotes (oblique?) to object (might demote initial object to non-core)<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">(and the philippine voice is something like " … promotes (anything) to subject (and doesn't demote initial subject to non-core)<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">However, every text study of either passives or applicatives, or non-core philippine-type voice choice, shows that there is a degree of pragmatic prominence associated with the use of these valency-rearranging operations. We might re-phrase
the passive and applicative characterisations as<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">passive promotes pragmatically-prominent object to subject (and demotes initial less-prominent subject to non-core)<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">applicative promotes pragmatically-prominent (oblique?) to object (might demote initial (less-prominent?) object to non-core)<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">We typically describe applicatives as involving just the grammatical function change. Thus, we have examples like this cited for Indonesian (from Shiohara 2012):<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<ol start="1" type="1">
<li style="color:black"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times;color:rgb(35,31,32)">(2)a <i>Pelayan mengambil segelas air</i>.</span><u></u><u></u></li></ol>
<p style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times;color:rgb(35,31,32)">waiter<span class="gmail-m_-8829330687252531427gmail-apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size:7pt;font-family:Times;color:rgb(35,31,32)">AV</span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times;color:rgb(35,31,32)">.take
a.glass.of water</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-left:0.5in"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times;color:rgb(35,31,32)">‘The waiter took a glass of water.’</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<ol start="2" type="1">
<li style="color:black"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times;color:rgb(35,31,32)">(2)b <i>Pelayan mengambil-kan tamu segelas air</i>.<br>
waiter<span class="gmail-m_-8829330687252531427gmail-apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size:7pt;font-family:Times;color:rgb(35,31,32)">AV</span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times;color:rgb(35,31,32)">.take-</span><span style="font-size:7pt;font-family:Times;color:rgb(35,31,32)">APPL<span class="gmail-m_-8829330687252531427gmail-apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Times;color:rgb(35,31,32)">guest
a.glass.of water<br>
‘The waiter brought the guest a glass of water.’ (Sneddon 1996: 80)</span><u></u><u></u></li></ol>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">As Susanna Cummings showed, however, (2)b examples are not really attested in naturalistic discourse; rather, we have examples like the following:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">(2)c Tamu di-ambil-kan segelas air (oleh pelayan).<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> guest NONACTIVE-take-APPL a.glass.of water by waiter<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> 'The waiter brought the guest a glass of water.'<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">(See also Donohue 2001 for similar data from Tukang Besi.)<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">So, this shows that (in some languages) the increased prominence of the argument that was sufficient to merit coding with an applicative construction is also sufficient to merit a non-active voice choice, with all that entails. A Philippine-type
voice system by stealth, as it were.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">The Tzutujil example has an applicative suffix; and it also has a verb with 3SG absolutive agreement (Ø), not 1SG (the in- in the first example I posted). It also has the requirement that there must be overt coding of the increased prominent
of the instrument; like Indonesian, it does that by utilising existing high-prominence coding strategies; unlike Indonesian, it does that not by using a voice change, but by using a pragmatically-marked word order choice.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">-Mark<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="gmail-m_-8829330687252531427entry" style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:1pt;margin-left:42.5pt">
<span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:Times;color:black">Donohue, Mark. 2001. Coding choices in argument structure: Austronesian applicatives in texts.<span class="gmail-m_-8829330687252531427gmail-apple-converted-space"> </span><i>Studies in Language</i>25 (2): 217-254.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 at 13:53, David Gil <<a href="mailto:gil@shh.mpg.de" target="_blank">gil@shh.mpg.de</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-style:none none none solid;border-left-width:1pt;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p>Mark,<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>Thanks for the Tzutujil example, which is indeed quite similar to the New Guinea constructions I have been looking at.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>However, I remain unconvinced with regard to its characterization as an applicative, though to a certain degree this is a mere terminological question. Prototypically, applicatives promote to direct objects while passive voices (such as instrumental) promote
to subjects — so, for any given construction, the question is whether the relevant argument, here the instrumental one, is more direct-object-like or more subject-like.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>This begins to remind me of the seemingly endless ongoing debates over whether Philippine voice constructions are "really" passives or perhaps something else, the question generally boiling down to whether the relevant argument is more like a subject or
more like a topic. Personally, I don't find these debates very productive, and I'm not sure how useful an analogous debate between applicative and instrumental-voice labels would prove to be in this case.
<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>What's important is to have a clear description of the facts, and how the constructions in question differ from prototypical applicatives and from prototypical instrumental voice constructions — with the proviso that there are perhaps not sufficiently many
of the latter to construct a clear notion of what is prototypical.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>David<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 22/02/2022 04:26, Mark Donohue wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I would agree with Matthew that these are best described as applicatives, but ones in which the 'pragmatic advancement' function monitored by an applicative is, in addition to the grammatical function coding changes, also required to be
monitored by the use of a pragmatically marked word order. <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Very similar facts are found in Tzutujil, in which the applicative, which indicates an instrumental role (despite having a morpheme cognate with the benefactive applicative in other Mayan languages) also requires the appearance of the instrument
object in a preverbal role, which is a pragmatically marked position in a verb-initial language.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Data from Dayley (1985).<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:55.3pt;line-height:15pt;break-after:avoid">
<span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times;color:blue">Xinruuch’eyi jaa7 tza7n chee7<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:55.3pt;line-height:15pt;break-after:avoid">
<span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times;color:blue">he:hit:me he with stick<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:28.35pt;margin-bottom:2pt;margin-left:59.55pt;text-align:justify;line-height:12pt">
<span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times">‘He hit me with a stick.’<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:55.3pt;line-height:15pt;break-after:avoid">
<span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times;color:blue">Chee7 x(r)uuch’eyb’ei jaa7 inin<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:55.3pt;line-height:15pt;break-after:avoid">
<span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times;color:blue">stick he:hit-with:it he 1SG<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:28.35pt;margin-bottom:2pt;margin-left:59.55pt;text-align:justify;line-height:12pt">
<span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Times">‘He hit me with a stick.’<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">-Mark<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 at 13:15, David Gil <<a href="mailto:gil@shh.mpg.de" target="_blank">gil@shh.mpg.de</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-style:none none none solid;border-left-width:1pt;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p>Matthew,<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>The reason I don't call it an applicative is that (in most cases) the instrumental argument must occur before the verb in a topic-like position.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>This can be illustrated with the Roon instrumental prefix <i>u-</i> in the following examples:<u></u><u></u></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="border-collapse:collapse">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="30" valign="top" style="width:22.25pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">(1)</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="72" valign="top" style="width:0.75in;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">* Eros-i</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="126" valign="top" style="width:94.5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">t-u-karuk</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="114" valign="top" style="width:85.5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">ai-i-ya</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30" valign="top" style="width:22.25pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="72" valign="top" style="width:0.75in;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">Eros-pers</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="126" valign="top" style="width:94.5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">3sg:anim-instr-chop</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="114" valign="top" style="width:85.5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">tree-3sg:anim-def<span style="color:black">
</span></span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt"> 'Eros chopped the tree'</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="border-collapse:collapse">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="30" valign="top" style="width:22.25pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">(2)</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="83" valign="top" style="width:62.3pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">I-seref</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="51" valign="top" style="width:38.2pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">kaman</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="30" valign="top" style="width:22.65pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">fa</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" style="width:47.85pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">Eros-i</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="126" valign="top" style="width:94.5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">t-u-karuk</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="114" valign="top" style="width:85.5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">ai-i-ya</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30" valign="top" style="width:22.25pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="83" valign="top" style="width:62.3pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">1sg-look.for</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="51" valign="top" style="width:38.2pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">axe</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="30" valign="top" style="width:22.65pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">for</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" style="width:47.85pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">Eros-pers</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="126" valign="top" style="width:94.5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">3sg:anim-instr-chop</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="114" valign="top" style="width:85.5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">tree-3sg:anim-def</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;color:white">
</span><span style="font-size:10pt">'I'm looking for an axe for Eros to chop the tree with'</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="border-collapse:collapse">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="30" valign="top" style="width:22.25pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">(3)</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="90" valign="top" style="width:67.25pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">I-seref</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="51" valign="top" style="width:38.2pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">kaman</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="63" valign="top" style="width:47.55pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">Eros-i</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="126" valign="top" style="width:94.5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">t-u-karuk<span style="color:black">
</span></span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="180" valign="top" style="width:135pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">ai-i-ya-ri-ya</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30" valign="top" style="width:22.25pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="90" valign="top" style="width:67.25pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">1sg-look.for</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="51" valign="top" style="width:38.2pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">axe</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="63" valign="top" style="width:47.55pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">Eros-pers</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="126" valign="top" style="width:94.5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">3sg:anim-instr-chop</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
<td width="180" valign="top" style="width:135pt;padding:0in 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">tree-3sg:anim-def-3sg:inan-def</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt"> 'I'm looking for the axe that Eros chopped the tree with'</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p>Sentence (1) is ungrammatical, and cannot be salvaged by adding a postverbal NP or PP referring to the axe; in this respect it differs from typical applicative constructions. In contrast, sentences (2) and (3) are fine, because the instrumental prefix
<i>u-</i> is licensed by the preceding NP <i>kaman</i> referring to the axe. True, this is not exactly the same as how things work in Philippine languages, but it is more like Philippine instrumental voice than anything else I can think of (including applicatives).
In particular, in (3), the instrumental prefix is required in order to license relativization (in contrast, relativization of other oblique arguments is zero-marked). To use Paul Schachter's terminology, in both (2) and (3), "subjecthood properties" seem
to be split between the agent (which, as you correctly point out, controls agreement) and the instrument.<br>
<br>
Very similar patterns obtain in the other Austronesian and non-Austronesian languages that I mentioned, which — given the apparent rarity of this pattern elsewhere — is strongly suggestive of language contact.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>David<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 22/02/2022 03:41, Matthew Dryer wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">David,<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Why would you not say that the instrumental construction in Meyah, Sougb, and Hatam is an applicative, since the A rather than the instrument controls subject agreement?<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Matthew<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div style="border-style:solid none none;border-top-width:1pt;border-top-color:rgb(181,196,223);padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:black">From:
</span></b><span style="color:black">Lingtyp <a href="mailto:lingtyp-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org" target="_blank">
<lingtyp-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org></a> on behalf of David Gil <a href="mailto:gil@shh.mpg.de" target="_blank">
<gil@shh.mpg.de></a><br>
<b>Date: </b>Monday, February 21, 2022 at 7:40 PM<br>
<b>To: </b><a href="mailto:lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org" target="_blank">"lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org"</a>
<a href="mailto:lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org" target="_blank"><lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org></a><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[Lingtyp] query: instrument voice</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear all,<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In the Austronesian languages of Taiwan, Philippines and Madagascar, there is a verbal affix that is said to mark "instrument voice"; loosely speaking, it marks the topic or subject
of the clause as bearing the semantic role of instrument.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Is anybody familiar with similar instrument-voice constructions from other parts of the world?<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The reason I ask is that a similar construction is present also in some languages of the Bird's Head and Cenderawasih Bay regions of New Guinea, eg. Biak, Roon, Wamesa and Wooi
(Austronesian), and Hatam, Sougb, Meyah and Moskona (non-Austronesian). What's curious about this construction is that, unlike the well-known Austronesian cases, it is the only morphologically-marked voice in each of the languages in question; there is no
"ordinary" morphological passive construction. My feeling is that this construction is quite uncommon cross-linguistically, but I would like to get a feel for the extent to which this is indeed true.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks,<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">David<u></u><u></u></p>
<pre>-- <u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>David Gil<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre> <u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Senior Scientist (Associate)<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Department of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig, 04103, Germany<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre> <u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Email: <a href="mailto:gil@shh.mpg.de" target="_blank">gil@shh.mpg.de</a><u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Mobile Phone (Israel): +972-526117713<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Mobile Phone (Indonesia): +62-81344082091<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre> <u></u><u></u></pre>
</div>
</blockquote>
<pre>-- <u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>David Gil<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre><u></u> <u></u></pre>
<pre>Senior Scientist (Associate)<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Department of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig, 04103, Germany<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre><u></u> <u></u></pre>
<pre>Email: <a href="mailto:gil@shh.mpg.de" target="_blank">gil@shh.mpg.de</a><u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Mobile Phone (Israel): +972-526117713<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Mobile Phone (Indonesia): +62-81344082091<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre><u></u> <u></u></pre>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
Lingtyp mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org" target="_blank">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a><br>
<a href="https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flistserv.linguistlist.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flingtyp&data=04%7C01%7Cdryer%40buffalo.edu%7C6406f22ffe22461267a608d9f5b2da3a%7C96464a8af8ed40b199e25f6b50a20250%7C0%7C0%7C637810970808922190%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=MvA7AGHFJpqrOSDagmZKQQ%2BuKfQRwmJLUyKIj25RLDg%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank">http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<pre>-- <u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>David Gil<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre><u></u> <u></u></pre>
<pre>Senior Scientist (Associate)<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Department of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig, 04103, Germany<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre><u></u> <u></u></pre>
<pre>Email: <a href="mailto:gil@shh.mpg.de" target="_blank">gil@shh.mpg.de</a><u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Mobile Phone (Israel): +972-526117713<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Mobile Phone (Indonesia): +62-81344082091<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre><u></u> <u></u></pre>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div>