<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
</div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<div class="page" title="Page 7" style="">
<div class="section" style="">
<div class="layoutArea" style="">
<div class="column" style="">
<p style="" class="elementToProof">Dear Sebastian, <br>
</p>
<p style="" class="elementToProof"><br>
</p>
<p style="" class="elementToProof">I'm only aware of the debate around LSA guidelines in the early 2000's, including, among others, Postal's (2003, 187) reply :</p>
<p style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"><span style="font-size:8.000000pt;font-family:'Code2000'" class="elementToProof"><br>
</span></p>
<p style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Code2000;" class="elementToProof">"it is arbitrary and discriminatory to try policing them only with respect to one or more favored victim
groups, the policing code is necessarily incompatible with the principle of free speech, and, finally, it is in any event not possible to actually codify usage conditions that genuinely pick out all and only the offensive. Given all this, codes like the LSA
guidelines are in part harmful and in part useless." (Postal 2003, 187).</span></p>
<span style="font-size: 11pt;"></span></div>
<span style="font-size: 11pt;"></span></div>
<span style="font-size: 11pt;"></span></div>
<span style="font-size: 11pt;"></span></div>
<span style="font-size: 11pt;"></span><br>
</div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof">Postal's paper will lead you to some relevant publications that defends policing to some extent.</div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="elementToProof"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="elementToProof">
<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;" class="elementToProof">Best,</span></div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="elementToProof">
<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;" class="elementToProof">Hagay</span></div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="elementToProof">
<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;" class="elementToProof"><br>
</span></div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; color:rgb(0,0,0)" class="elementToProof">
<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;" class="elementToProof"><span style="margin:0px;font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;color:rgb(34, 34, 34);background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255);text-align:left;display:inline !important">Postal,
P. M. (2003). Policing the content of linguistic examples.<span style="margin:0px"> </span></span><i style="background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255);color:rgb(34, 34, 34);font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;text-align:left">Language</i><span style="margin:0px;font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;color:rgb(34, 34, 34);background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255);text-align:left;display:inline !important">,<span style="margin:0px"> </span></span><i style="background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255);color:rgb(34, 34, 34);font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;text-align:left">79</i><span class="elementToProof" style="margin:0px;font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, sans-serif;color:rgb(34, 34, 34);background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255);text-align:left;display:inline !important">(1),
182-188.</span><br>
</span></div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000" style="font-size:11pt"><b>From:</b> Lingtyp <lingtyp-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org> on behalf of lingtyp-request@listserv.linguistlist.org <lingtyp-request@listserv.linguistlist.org><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, March 18, 2022 12:00 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org <lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [EXTERNAL]Lingtyp Digest, Vol 90, Issue 21</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt">
<div class="PlainText">Send Lingtyp mailing list submissions to<br>
lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org<br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp">http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
lingtyp-request@listserv.linguistlist.org<br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
lingtyp-owner@listserv.linguistlist.org<br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of Lingtyp digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Reference for violence (hit, kill) in articles in linguistics<br>
needed (Sebastian Nordhoff)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 12:51:15 +0100<br>
From: Sebastian Nordhoff <sebastian.nordhoff@glottotopia.de><br>
To: "lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org"<br>
<lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org><br>
Subject: [Lingtyp] Reference for violence (hit, kill) in articles in<br>
linguistics needed<br>
Message-ID: <7a23c27d-4cc4-e57b-37c6-ac5570a6d144@glottotopia.de><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed<br>
<br>
Dear all,<br>
I have occasionally been part in discussions where the frequent use of <br>
violent concepts such as 'hit' or 'kill' in linguistics is mentioned and <br>
sometimes criticized.<br>
<br>
I believe there is some research article providing empirical evidence <br>
for linguistic articles being unnecessarily "violent", but I am unable <br>
to locate it. Could the list members help me?<br>
<br>
Best wishes<br>
Sebastian<br>
<br>
PS: I am aware that 'hit' and 'kill' have a number of semantic <br>
properties which make them very suitable for a number of research questions.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Subject: Digest Footer<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Lingtyp mailing list<br>
Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org<br>
<a href="http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp">http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a><br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
End of Lingtyp Digest, Vol 90, Issue 21<br>
***************************************<br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</body>
</html>