<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
Dear Jürgen,<br>
<br>
to mitigate a bit your pessimist opinion of the methodological
situation of our discipline, let me mention, as a contribution to
the discussion you are requiring, my web page<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.christianlehmann.eu/ling/ling_meth/ling_description/representations/?open=example.inc">https://www.christianlehmann.eu/ling/ling_meth/ling_description/representations/?open=example.inc</a><br>
which advocates a distinction between <br>
<ol>
<li>a probatory example (which is data used as scientific
evidence)</li>
<li>and an illustrative example (or pedagogical example, which is
only meant to render a descriptive statement more concrete and,
thus, to help understanding).</li>
</ol>
Methodological standards for these two kinds of examples are
completely different. On #1, I may recommend:<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249931781_Data_in_linguistics">Lehmann,
Christian 2004, “Data in linguistics.” <i>The Linguistic Review</i>
21(3/4):275-310.</a><br>
<br>
Best,<br>
Christian<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<p style="font-size:90%">Prof. em. Dr. Christian Lehmann<br>
Rudolfstr. 4<br>
99092 Erfurt<br>
<span style="font-variant:small-caps">Deutschland</span></p>
<table style="font-size:80%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Tel.:</td>
<td>+49/361/2113417</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>E-Post:</td>
<td><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:christianw_lehmann@arcor.de">christianw_lehmann@arcor.de</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Web:</td>
<td><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.christianlehmann.eu">https://www.christianlehmann.eu</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</body>
</html>