<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Does that mean <i class="">syncrisis</i><span style="font-style: normal;" class=""> would be a more etymologically accurate term for “syncretism”?</span><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Siva<br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 17 Aug 2023, at 9:29 am, Christian Lehmann <<a href="mailto:christian.lehmann@uni-erfurt.de" class="">christian.lehmann@uni-erfurt.de</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">
  
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" class="">
  
  <div class=""><p class="">As for the terminological question:</p><p class="">The idea behind the term <i class="">syncretism</i> is 'mixture'; it is
      based - with some non-canonical morphology intervening - on the
      Greek verb for mixing (the English wikipedia is on the right track
      with this). However, this idea fits better the religious concept
      of syncretism. The linguistic concept is not really a kind of
      mixing things, but a failure to distinguish them. Its opposite is
      differentiation or distinction. If you want a Greek term, it would
      be <i class="">diacrisis</i>. This is actually an English word (all Greek
      and Latin terms are English words ...), although heretofore
      occupied by other disciplines with different meanings.<br class="">
    </p><p class=""><i class="">Discretism</i> would be the habit of being discrete - not
      recommended.</p><p class="">-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br class="">
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 15.08.2023 um 03:27 schrieb Cat
      Butz:<br class="">
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:7dfed832b0c6fe092089a7bc7110d9eb@hhu.de" class="">Hello everyone,
      <br class="">
      <br class="">
      I'm presenting a pronoun paradigm of Dalkalaen this week at the
      Affixes symposium in Turku. It exhibits both some very weird
      syncretism (same marking of 1EX and 2nd person) and the opposite
      of that (e.g. plural being marked differently in all four
      persons). What do we call that? Just differential marking?
      <br class="">
      <br class="">
      Thank you, and hopefully see you on Thursday/Friday,
      <br class="">
    </blockquote>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br class=""><p style="font-size:90%" class="">Prof. em. Dr. Christian Lehmann<br class="">
        Rudolfstr. 4<br class="">
        99092 Erfurt<br class="">
        <span style="font-variant:small-caps" class="">Deutschland</span></p>
      <table style="font-size:80%" class="">
        <tbody class="">
          <tr class="">
            <td class="">Tel.:</td>
            <td class="">+49/361/2113417</td>
          </tr>
          <tr class="">
            <td class="">E-Post:</td>
            <td class=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:christianw_lehmann@arcor.de">christianw_lehmann@arcor.de</a></td>
          </tr>
          <tr class="">
            <td class="">Web:</td>
            <td class=""><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.christianlehmann.eu/">https://www.christianlehmann.eu</a></td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </div>
  </div>

_______________________________________________<br class="">Lingtyp mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org" class="">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a><br class="">https://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>