<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:large;color:#0000ff">A very good account of Counter factuals across typologically and genetically distinct and similar languages is given in here <a href="https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.18044.kut" style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small">The grammar of ‘non-realization’ | John Benjamins (jbe-platform.com)</a></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:large;color:#0000ff">Anvita</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 3:11 AM Paolo Ramat <<a href="mailto:paoram@unipv.it">paoram@unipv.it</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Dear Tom, to your list of references concerning counterfactuals you may add<div>Zlatka Guentchéva (éd.), <i>L’énonciation </i><i>médiatisée, </i>Peeters, Louvain - Paris 1996, which deals ,among other topics, with adverbs introducing counterfactuality, such as <i>allegedly, supposedly</i></div><div>See also Paolo Ramat & Davide Ricca, 'Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe' , in J. van der Auwera (ed.), <i>Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, </i>Mouton de Gruyter 1998. Counterfactual ADVs may impact on the syntax of the sentence.</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div>Paolo</div><div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">Prof. Dr. Paolo Ramat</span><div style="color:rgb(34,34,34)"><div>Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Socio corrispondente<br><div>'Academia Europaea'</div><div>'Societas Linguistica Europaea', Honorary Member</div></div><div><div>Università di Pavia (retired)</div><div>Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori (IUSS Pavia) (retired)</div></div><div><br></div></div><div style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">piazzetta Arduino 11 - I 27100 Pavia</div><div style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">##39 0382 27027</div><div style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">347 044 98 44</div></div></div></div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Il giorno mar 19 set 2023 alle ore 17:23 Tom Bossuyt <<a href="mailto:Tom.Bossuyt@ugent.be" target="_blank">Tom.Bossuyt@ugent.be</a>> ha scritto:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div>
<div lang="en-BE">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Dear colleagues,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">We hereby send you the Call for Papers of our proposed workshop “Counterfactuals: Families of constructions” at SLE 57 in Helsinki, 21 – 24 August 2024.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Convenors: Jesus Olguin Martinez (Illinois State University), Tom Bossuyt (Ghent University), Ellison Luk (KU Leuven)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Keywords: counterfactuals, usage-based approach, grammar network, family of constructions, conditionals, insubordination, typology<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Deadline: provisional 300-word abstracts by 10 November 2023.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Description<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Counterfactual constructions convey the speaker’s belief that the actualization of a situation was potential – possible, desirable, imminent, or intended –, but that it did not take place, i.e. it did not belong to the actual world (Verstraete
2005: 231). While counterfactuals have mostly been studied in formal-semantic frameworks (e.g., Baker 1970; Iatridou 2000; Ippolito 2003; Karttunen 1970; Kratzer 1981; Lewis 1973; Reinhart 1976; von Fintel 2001; inter alia), few studies have explored counterfactuals
from a functional perspective (but see <a name="m_-8537443929509137878_m_-9160207730648994777__Hlk130881022">Olguin Martinez & Lester 2021; Van linden & Verstraete 2008; Verstraete & Luk 2021</a>). The goal of this workshop is to help fill this gap. Counterfactuals are typically associated with the kind
of conditional construction exemplified in (1).</span><span lang="EN-US"> </span>
<span lang="EN-US">However, they may show up in other guises as well, e.g. hypothetical manner constructions as in (2), various non-prototypical conditionals such as the concessive-conditional example in (3), or ‘if not for NP’ constructions as in (4).
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">(1) If I had known that, I wouldn’t have appointed him.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">(2) </span><span lang="EN-US">The child is crying, as if I had hit him.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">(3)<span style="color:black"> Even if I had told you, you wouldn’t have come.<u></u><u></u></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:36pt;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Khmer (Austro-Asiatic)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">(4) baeu kom baːn kun bawn preah loːk cuaj,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"> if <span style="font-variant:small-caps">
NEG</span> get merit grace lord monk help<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"> ‘Without the help of God,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"> srac bat tev haeuj.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"> ready disappear go already<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"> I would have been lost.’ (<a name="m_-8537443929509137878_m_-9160207730648994777__Hlk131053719">Haiman 2011</a>: 226)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Apart from complex sentences, counterfactuality can also be expressed by simple clauses. In many languages, these are structurally similar to the main clause of a conditional counterfactual construction as in (5) and (6) (<a name="m_-8537443929509137878_m_-9160207730648994777__Hlk81037609">Van
linden & Verstraete 2008</a>: 1888).<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">(5) I should have done it!<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<a name="m_-8537443929509137878_m_-9160207730648994777__Hlk81037636"><span lang="EN-US">(6) </span></a><span lang="EN-US">I would have come this morning!<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Other languages have a construction that could be regarded as a counterfactual conditional construction with an elided main clause as in (7) (Kawachi 2014: 91). These instances are known in the literature as ‘counterfactual wishes’ and seem
to be the result of insubordination (Evans & Wanatabe 2016).<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">(7) If only she had come!<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:36pt;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">The counterfactual constructions discussed above form a
<span style="font-variant:small-caps">FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTIONS</span>. In recent years, this notion has established itself in Construction Grammar as a label for sets of constructions with a similar meaning or function, often despite striking differences of
form (Diessel 2019: 199-200; Leuschner 2020; Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez et al. 2017; Vander Haegen et al. 2022).</span><span lang="EN-US"> Family resemblances should be considered a synchronic reflection of the ongoing diachronic emergence of the constructions
in question. Unlike the derivation processes assumed in the classic version of generative grammar, associative connections between constructions reflect the language users’ experience with particular patterns (Croft 2001; Diessel 2019). Analyzing families
of constructions can allow us to formulate not only hypotheses about how existing schemas may be used to categorize novel linguistic experiences, but also hypotheses about the linear arrangement of linguistic elements, and associative connections between individual
lexemes and specific slots of constructional schemas. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">Aims of the workshop<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">The workshop will bring together original research that contributes to our understanding of the range and limits of crosslinguistic variation of counterfactual constructions. Thanks to descriptions of the forms, syntactic
strategies, and semantic profiles of such constructions in a given language, family, or macro-area, the workshop will pave the way for a typology of counterfactuals. Potential contributions include, but are not restricted to, the following:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">1. TAM values. What are the profiles of the TAM values that are associated with counterfactual marking (e.g., irrealis, frustrative, past tense; cf. Overall 2017: 492; von Prince 2019; von Prince et al. 2022)? How do the semantics of certain
language-particular “irrealis” categories and counterfactuality relate to each other? If a language contains more than one type of counterfactual construction, do they occur with the same TAM values?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">2. Clause-linking markers. If a language contains multi-word counterfactual connectives, what are the building blocks of the multi-word expression? What motivates their co-occurrence? What determines the linear order of the building blocks
of multi-word counterfactual connectives (i.e. sequential relations; Diessel 2019: 15)?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">3. Diachrony. What are the diachronic sources of grammatical markers used for encoding counterfactual constructions?
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">4. Optionality. Clause-linking markers and/or TAM values may be optional in that can be omitted without affecting the meaning of the construction. What are the factors that may lead speakers to omit TAM or clause-linking markers from a counterfactual
construction? <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">5. Language contact. Are counterfactual constructions prone to diffusion? What are the mechanisms involved in the development of counterfactuals through language contact?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">6. Filler-slot relations. In many languages, speakers can choose to verbalize counterfactual thoughts/experiences in different ways (e.g., If only she had gone! vs. I wish she had gone!). The question is: Do these counterfactual constructions
appear with the same verbs in a particular slot? The co-occurrence patterning of lexemes and constructions is functionally motivated (<a name="m_-8537443929509137878_m_-9160207730648994777__Hlk130882065">Gries & Stefanowitsch 2004: 99</a>), giving rise to a joint distribution of lexemes in constructions
that are known in the literature as filler-slot relations (Diessel 2019: 20). <u></u>
<u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">7. Discourse functions. Counterfactuals may develop intriguing discourse functions. For instance, in many languages around the world, hypothetical manner constructions may develop into insubordinate constructions with exclamative force (e.g.
as if he had a lot of money!; Olguin Martinez 2021).<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Please send provisional abstracts of no more than 300 words (excluding references) in PDF format by 10 November 2023 to the following email addresses:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><a href="mailto:jfolguinmartinez@gmail.com" target="_blank">jfolguinmartinez@gmail.com</a><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><a href="mailto:tom.bossuyt@ugent.be" target="_blank">tom.bossuyt@ugent.be</a><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><a href="mailto:ellisonluk@gmail.com" target="_blank">ellisonluk@gmail.com</a><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">If the workshop is approved, authors will be asked to submit revised 500-word abstracts according to the SLE guidelines.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">References<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Baker, C. Lee. 1970. Problems of polarity in counterfactuals. In Jerrold Sadock & Anthony Vanek (eds.), Studies Presented to Robert B. Lees by his Students, 1-15. Edmonton: PIL Monograph Series 1, Linguistic Research Inc.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:21.3pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;background:white">
<span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
</span><span lang="EN-US"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.45pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Diessel, Holger. 2019. The grammar network. How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Evans, Nicholas & Honoré Watanabe. 2016. The dynamics of insubordination: An overview. In Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds.) Insubordination, 1-38.
</span><span lang="EN-US">Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:1cm;line-height:normal">
<a name="m_-8537443929509137878_m_-9160207730648994777__Hlk130882395"><span lang="EN-US">Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspectives on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9. 97-129.<u></u><u></u></span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span><span lang="EN-US">Haiman, John. 2011. Cambodian (Khmer). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.<u></u><u></u></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span><span lang="EN-US">Iatridou, Sabine. 2000. The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry 31. 231-270.<u></u><u></u></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span><span lang="EN-US">Ippolito, Michela. 2003. Presuppositions and implicatures in counterfactuals. Natural Language Semantics 11. 145-186.<u></u><u></u></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span><span lang="EN-US">Karttunen</span></span><span lang="EN-US">, Lauri. 1971. Subjunctive conditionals and polarity reversals. Papers in Linguistics 4. 279-296.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Kawachi, Kazuhiro. 2015. Insubordinated conditionals in Kupsapiny (Kupsapiiny, Kupsabiny). Asian and African Languages and Linguistics 9. 65-104.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. Partition and revision: The semantics of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic 10. 201-216.</span><span lang="EN-US"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Leuschner, Torsten. 2020. Concessive conditionals as a family of constructions. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34. 235-247.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.<a name="m_-8537443929509137878_m_-9160207730648994777_SignatureSanitizer__Hlk39482363"><u></u><u></u></a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span><span lang="EN-US">Olguin Martinez, Jesus. 2021.
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">Hypothetical manner constructions in world-wide perspective. Journal Linguistic typology at the crossroads 1. 2-33.</span><span lang="EN-US"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Olguin Martinez, Jesus & Nicholas Lester. 2021. A quantitative analysis of counterfactual conditionals in the world’s languages. Italian Journal of Linguistics 33. 147-182.</span><span lang="EN-US"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Overall, Simon. 2017. A typology of frustrative marking in Amazonian languages. In Alexandra Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic typology, 477-512. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Reinhart, Tanya. 1976. Polarity reversal: Logic or pragmatics? Linguistic Inquiry 7. 697-705.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez,</span><span lang="EN-US"> </span><span lang="EN-US">Francisco Jose, Alba Luzondo Oyon, & Paula Perez Sobrino. 2017. Investigating the construction. In Francisco Jose Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez, Alba Luzondo Oyon, & Paula
Perez Sobrino, Constructing families of constructions: Analytical perspectives and theoretical challenges, 1-16. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-GB">Vander Haegen, Flor, Tom Bossuyt, & Torsten Leuschner. </span>
<span lang="EN-US">2022. Emerging into your family of constructions: German [IRR was] ‘no matter what’. Constructions and frames 14. 150-180.</span><span lang="EN-US"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Van linden, An & Jean-Christophe Verstraete. 2008. The nature and origin of counterfactuality in simple clauses: Cross-linguistic evidence. Journal of Pragmatics 40. 1865-1895.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">von Fintel, Kai. 2001. Counterfactuals in a dynamic context. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 123-152. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">von Prince, Kilu. 2019. Counterfactuality and past. Linguistics and Philosophy 42. 577-615.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-GB">von Prince, Kilu, Ana Krajinovic, & Manfred Krifka. </span><span lang="EN-US">2022. Irrealis is real. Language 98. 221-249.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2005. The semantics and pragmatics of composite mood marking: The non-Pama-Nyungan languages of Northern Australia. Linguistic Typology 9. 223-268.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:36pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal">
<span lang="EN-US">Verstraete, Jean-Christophe & Ellison Luk. 2021. Shaking up counterfactuality: Even closer to the linguistic facts.
</span><span lang="EN-US">Theoretical Linguistics 47. 287-296.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Lingtyp mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org" target="_blank">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a><br>
<a href="https://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a><br>
</div></blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Lingtyp mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org" target="_blank">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a><br>
<a href="https://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a><br>
</blockquote></div>