<div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">Dear

colleagues,</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">Maria

Khachaturyan, Pavel Ozerov and Vladimir Panov (myself) are preparing a workshop

proposal for the next SLE conference, which will take place in Osnabrück,

Germany, 26 - 29 August 2026. The topic is “Rethinking argument structure

interactionally: Deviations from <i>Who Does

What to Whom</i> across the languages”. 

Please find the Call for Papers below. We look forward to receiving your

300-word abstract by 10 November 2025.</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">Best,</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">Vladimir,

Maria and Pavel</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">***

Call for Papers below ***</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Workshop at SLE 2026: Rethinking argument structure

interactionally: Deviations from <i>Who Does

What to Whom</i> across the languages</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Convenors:</span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;margin:0cm;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Vladimir

Panov: Vilnius University (</span><span lang="EN"><a href="mailto:vladimir.panov@flf.vu.lt"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">vladimir.panov@flf.vu.lt</span></a></span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">)</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;margin:0cm;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Maria

Khachaturyan: CNRS; University of Helsinki (</span><span lang="EN"><a href="mailto:maria.khachaturyan@helsinki.fi"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">maria.khachaturyan@helsinki.fi</span></a></span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial"> </span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">)</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 10pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Pavel Ozerov: University of Innsbruck (</span><span lang="EN"><a href="mailto:pavel.ozerov@uibk.ac.at"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">pavel.ozerov@uibk.ac.at</span></a></span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">).</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Presentation</span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">The goal of this workshop is to lay the groundwork for an

utterance/TCU-oriented typology. Departing from the traditional clause-based

model of cross-linguistic variation, we aim to uncover the fundamental

syntactic patterns of spoken discourse and the typological variation in this

domain.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Traditionally, linguistics has emphasized clausal structures

and sentences, commonly defined as structures with a predicate and its

arguments. Such structures typically express a proposition, a description of an

event that addresses the question of <i>Who

does what to whom. </i> Although a

definition of the basic notions of clause and sentence is known to be

problematic under close scrutiny (e.g. de Beaugrande 1999), clause-based

argument structure is the traditional domain of theoretical and typological

inquiry of syntax. Such a view is reflected throughout linguistic literature,

as is illustrated in (1):</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">(1)<i>       I

wrote a long letter</i> (Croft 2022: 32)</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Despite the massive shift to usage-based models in current

linguistic thinking, the clause/sentence-based view of grammar persists nearly

unchallenged.  Distributional typology,

which has gained popularity in recent years, significantly reformulates the

discipline’s goals as asking and answering the questions <i>what’s where why</i>. However, it remains rather traditional in its

focus on <i>Who does what to whom</i>

structures. This stance is evident, for example, in recent discussions on the

forces that shape case-marking systems cross-linguistically: “In utterances

with an agent (A) and a patient (P)—for example, <i>Henry kissed Mark</i>—languages need to signal which argument maps onto

which role.” (Shcherbakova et al. 2024: 7259). Similarly, cognitive

experimental approaches operate within the sentence-planning and comprehension

paradigm, with the requirement to produce a full clause as a response to a

stimulus (e.g. Nordlinger, Rodriguez and Kidd 2022:195).</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">By contrast, conversation analysis and its daughter

approach, interactional linguistics, have focused on the structures of spoken

language in face-to-face interactions. In this tradition, it has long been

known that units of spoken interaction, such as (the lexical content of)

intonation units (IUs) and turn construction units (TCUs), can constitute

locally sufficient contributions, without forming a clause in the traditional

sense. The panoply of such structures and the phenomena they represent is broad.

This includes, for example, incremental planning and delivery. While the

incremental view is in line with current clause-based approaches to planning

(cf. again Nordlinger, Rodriguez and Kidd 2022 above), in the interactional

view chunks that do not evolve into a clausal structure form nonetheless part

of the overall larger structure. A different type of a phenomenon are

structures that conventionally convey information without having a clausal

structure. This, for instance, includes detached NPs used for such tasks as

shifting attention to a referent, assessments, exclamations, requests or

narration (Sorjonen and Raevaara 2014, Helasvuo 2019, Izre’el  2018). Some additional well-known cases of

non-clausal constructions with heavy interactional load and designated

functions are vocatives (Sonnenhauser and Noel Aziz Hanna 2013) and

interjections (Dingemanse 2024). Taking a non-clausal analysis of such

structures seriously leads to further theoretical questions, such as the

clausal nature of stand-alone verbs and the notion of “omittable arguments” in

“radical pro-drop” languages. Is reconstructing a clause in such cases

justifiable, or is it parallel to reconstructing, for instance, “an omitted

temporal adverbial” where the temporal reference is established from the

context (as potentially is the case in (1)). Finally, there is an also

widespread family of mirror-image phenomena where syntactic structures

conventionally go beyond expressing aspects of the reported event and involve

aspects of the speech act and its sociopragmatic settings (such as allocutivity

(Antonov 2015)).<i></i></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Unfortunately, interactional linguistics and typologically

informed usage-based linguistics continue to exist in parallel universes. There

are very few studies that seriously ask how “clausal” spoken languages actually

are. Notable attempts to bridge the gap originating in interactionally informed

approaches, are yet to make an impact on theoretical linguistics and typology.

For example, Laury, Ono & Suzuki (2019) show that Finnish and Japanese

differ significantly with respect to argument expression and, consequently, the

proximity to the who-does-what-to-whom prototype.

While Finnish speakers most often express at least one “argument” overtly (and

the predicate is obligatory marked for subject), Japanese speakers seem to

orient to predicate-only TCUs (cf. also the contributions to special issues of <i>Studies in Language </i>2019 and <i>Languages 2025</i> edited by Laury and Ono

on this topic). Yet, <span style="background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">to this

day, the dialogue between interactional approaches, general linguistics,

usage-based theories, and typology is minimal. Moreover, the coverage of this

research has been rather narrow, with much of the work concentrating on the

same language choice. Building upon the seminal work of Ono, Laury and others,

we aim to collect new cross-linguistic evidence and develop further the attempt

to situate the problem of adequacy of clause- and argument structure-based

thinking at the core of the general linguistic discussion.</span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">The aim of the workshop is thus an attempt to discuss and

determine what components basic units of natural spoken discourse consist of,

and how languages differ in this respect. We are particularly interested in

deviations from prototypical clausal structures (predicate + arguments). These

deviations can be classified into two main types: (1) “omission” or non-marking

of typical arguments (A, S, P, R, etc.) and (2) addition (more or less

obligatory) of non-canonical referential phrases: topics, other detached noun

phrases, address forms, etc. Some of these deviations have been discussed in

the literature., e.g.:</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 54pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">-</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:7pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">        </span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Prevalence

of predicate-only structures, e.g. Japanese (Laury, Ono & Suzuki 2019),</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 54pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">-</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:7pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">        </span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Prevalence

of structures based on referential structures with no overt syntactic relations

to the rest of the utterance (“topic-prominent languages” Li & Thompson

1976, Left Dislocations (Ozerov 2024) and more)</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 54pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">-     Non-specification

or underspecification of thematic roles of the referents, e.g. Riau Indonesian

(Gil 2004; Gil & Shen 2019),</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 54pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">-</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:7pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">        </span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Addressee

prominence: allocutivity, e.g. Basque and Korean (Antonov 2013, 2015), and

familiarizers (Kleinknecht & Souza 2017),</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 54pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">-</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:7pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">        </span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Obligatory

indexation of the speech situation, such as avoidance speech, e.g., the

mother-in-law speech style in Dyirbal (Dixon 2015).</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 54pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">-</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:7pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">        </span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Other

quasi-obligatory pragmatic marking, e.g., through final</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:7pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">particles in

East Asia (Panov 2020)</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt 54pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">-     The “online

syntax” approach (Hopper 1987; Auer 2015) arguing that typical clauses emerge

in the incremental production of utterances.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Research

questions</span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">This workshop invites contributions that ask and answer the

following questions using concrete, language-specific and cross-linguistic

data:</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 54pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">-</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:7pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">        </span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">How

do naturally occurring units of interaction in individual languages differ from

the clausal prototype “predicate + arguments” (<i>who does what to whom</i>)?</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 54pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">-</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:7pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">        </span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">What

types of frequent or obligatory, free or bound referential phrases do occur

beyond the standard semantic types of arguments (S, A, P, T, R)?</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 54pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">-</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:7pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">        </span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">How

much non-specification of thematic roles can be found cross-linguistically?</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 54pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">-</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:7pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">        </span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Are

there any areal or genealogical clines in utterance types that do not fit the

clausal prototype?</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 54pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">-</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:7pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">        </span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Is

propositional content and indexing of the speech event features a binary

opposition or a continuum?</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt 54pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">-</span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:7pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">        </span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Which alternative models of syntax can account for

utterances that are not prototypical clauses? What can we benefit from applying

these models to clausal patterns?</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">Please send provisional

abstracts of no more than 300 words (excluding references) in PDF format by

November 10, 2025 to any of the convenors:</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;margin:0cm;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">Vladimir Panov: </span><span lang="EN"><a href="mailto:vladimir.panov@flf.vu.lt"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">vladimir.panov@flf.vu.lt</span></a></span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial"></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;margin:0cm;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">Maria Khachaturyan: </span><span lang="EN"><a href="mailto:maria.khachaturyan@helsinki.fi"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">maria.khachaturyan@helsinki.fi</span></a></span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial"> </span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">Pavel Ozerov:  </span><span lang="EN"><a href="mailto:pavel.ozerov@uibk.ac.at"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">pavel.ozerov@uibk.ac.at</span></a></span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial"> </span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><b><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">References</span></b></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Antonov, Anton. 2013. Grammaticalization of allocutivity

markers in Japanese and Korean in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Martine

Robbeets & Hubert Cuyckens (Hrsg.), <i>Shared

Grammaticalization: With special focus on the Transeurasian languages</i>

(Studies in Language Companion Series), vol. 132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

doi:10.1075/slcs.132.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Antonov, Anton. 2015. Verbal allocutivity in a

crosslinguistic perspective. <i>Linguistic

Typology</i> 19(1). 55–85. doi:10.1515/lingty-2015-0002.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Auer, Peter. 2015. The temporality of language in

interaction: projection and latency. In Arnulf Deppermann & Susanne

Günthner (Hrsg.), <i>Studies in Language and

Social Interaction, vol. 27, 27–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

doi:10.1075/slsi.27.01aue.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">De Beaugrande, R., 1999. Sentence first, verdict afterwards:

On the remarkable career of the “sentence”. Word,

<i>50</i>(1), pp.1-31.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Croft, William. 2022. 

<i>Morphosyntax: Constructions of the

World’s Languages. 1. edn. Cambridge University Press.

doi:10.1017/9781316145289.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Dingemanse, Mark. 2024. Interjections at the heart of

language. <i>Annual Review of Linguistics</i>,

<i>10</i>(1), pp.257-277.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Dixon, R. M. W. 2015. <i>Edible

Gender, Mother-in-Law Style, and Other Grammatical Wonders: Studies in Dyirbal,

Yidiñ, and Warrgamay. Oxford University Press.

doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702900.001.0001.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Gil, David. 2004.: Riau Indonesian Sama: Explorations in

macrofunctionality. In Martin Haspelmath (Hrsg.), <i>Coordinating constructions</i>, vol. 58, 371–424. Amsterdam: John

Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/tsl.58.20gil.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Gil, David & Yeshayahu Shen. 2019. How Grammar

Introduces Asymmetry Into Cognitive Structures: Compositional Semantics,

Metaphors, and Schematological Hybrids. <i>Frontiers

in Psychology</i> 10. 2275. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02275.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2019. Free NPs as units in Finnish. <i>Studies in Language</i> 43.2: 301-328.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Hopper, Paul. 1987. Emergent Grammar. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 13. 139–157.

doi:10.3765/bls.v13i0.1834.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Izre’el, Shlomo. 2018. Unipartite clauses: A view from

spoken Israeli Hebrew. In <i>Afroasiatic:

Data and perspectives</i> (pp. 235-259). John Benjamins</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Kleinknecht, Friederike & Miguel Souza. 2017. Vocatives

as a source category for pragmatic markers: From deixis to discourse marking

via affectivity. In Chiara Fedriani & Andrea Sansò (Hrsg.), <i>Studies in Language Companion Series</i>,

vol. 186, 257–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

doi:10.1075/slcs.186.10kle.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Laury, Ritva, Tsuyoshi Ono & Ryoko Suzuki. 2019.

Questioning the clause as a crosslinguistic unit in grammar and interaction. Studies in Language 43(2). 364–401.

doi:10.1075/sl.17032.lau.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1976. Subject and

topic: A new typology of language. In Charles N. Li (Hrsg.), <i>Subject and Topic: A New Typology of

Language</i>, 457–489. New York: Academic Press.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Linell, Per. 2005. <i>The

written language bias in linguistics: its nature, origins and transformations</i>

(Routledge Advances in Communication and Linguistic Theory 5). First issued in

paperback. London New York: Routledge.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Nordlinger, R., Rodriguez, G.G., & Kidd, E. (2022).

Sentence planning and production in Murrinhpatha, an Australian 'free word

order' language. <i>Language</i> <i>98</i>(2), 187-220.</span><span lang="EN"><a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.2022.0008"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:windowtext;text-decoration-line:none"> </span></a><a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.2022.0008"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.2022.0008</span></a></span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Ozerov, Pavel (2024): Left Dislocation in Spoken Hebrew, it

is neither topicalizing nor a construction. <i>Linguistics</i>

doi:10.1515/ling-2023-0174.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Panov, Vladimir (2020): Final particles in Asia:

Establishing an areal feature. <i>Linguistic

Typology</i> 24(1). 13–70. doi:10.1515/lingty-2019-2032.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Shcherbakova, Olena, Damián E. Blasi, Volker Gast, Hedvig

Skirgård, Russell D. Gray & Simon J. Greenhill (2024): The evolutionary

dynamics of how languages signal who does what to whom. <i>Scientific Reports</i> 14(1). 7259. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-51542-5.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Sonnenhauser, Barbara, and Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna. 2013.

"Vocative." <i>Addressing between

System and Performance. </i>Berlin: de Gruyter.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Sorjonen, M.L. and Raevaara, L., 2014. On the grammatical

form of requests at the convenience store: Requesting as embodied action. In Requesting in social interaction (pp.

243-268). John Benjamins</span></p></div>