<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Segoe UI Emoji";
panose-1:2 11 5 2 4 2 4 2 2 3;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Trebuchet MS";
panose-1:2 11 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0cm;
margin-right:0cm;
margin-bottom:0cm;
margin-left:36.0pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
p.wordsection1, li.wordsection1, div.wordsection1
{mso-style-name:wordsection1;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
span.E-MailFormatvorlage23
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 2.0cm 70.85pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:102503204;
mso-list-template-ids:318306162;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:36.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level2
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:72.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level3
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:108.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level4
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:144.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level5
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:180.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level6
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:216.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level7
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:252.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level8
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:288.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level9
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:324.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l1
{mso-list-id:885065450;
mso-list-template-ids:-206005040;}
@list l1:level1
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:36.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l1:level2
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:o;
mso-level-tab-stop:72.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
@list l1:level3
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:108.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l1:level4
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:144.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l1:level5
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:180.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l1:level6
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:216.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l1:level7
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:252.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l1:level8
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:288.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l1:level9
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:324.0pt;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l2
{mso-list-id:982349000;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:2058904252 1282020264 67567641 67567643 67567631 67567641 67567643 67567631 67567641 67567643;}
@list l2:level1
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-text:"\(%1\)";
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
margin-left:54.0pt;
text-indent:-36.0pt;}
@list l2:level2
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l2:level3
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l2:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l2:level5
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l2:level6
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l2:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l2:level8
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l2:level9
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l3
{mso-list-id:1005133189;
mso-list-template-ids:1490456946;}
@list l4
{mso-list-id:1498961322;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:-1036721052 -138878150 67567641 67567643 67567631 67567641 67567643 67567631 67567641 67567643;}
@list l4:level1
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-text:"\(%1\)";
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
margin-left:54.0pt;
text-indent:-36.0pt;}
@list l4:level2
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l4:level3
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l4:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l4:level5
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l4:level6
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l4:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l4:level8
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l4:level9
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l5
{mso-list-id:1529904753;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:-1162829246 -1013053344 67567641 67567643 67567631 67567641 67567643 67567631 67567641 67567643;}
@list l5:level1
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-text:"\(%1\)";
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l5:level2
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l5:level3
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l5:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l5:level5
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l5:level6
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l5:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l5:level8
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l5:level9
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l6
{mso-list-id:1840342065;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:1040478920 67567637 67567641 67567643 67567631 67567641 67567643 67567631 67567641 67567643;}
@list l6:level1
{mso-level-text:"\(%1\)";
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l6:level2
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l6:level3
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l6:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l6:level5
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l6:level6
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l6:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l6:level8
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l6:level9
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l7
{mso-list-id:1979871489;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:-2088751586 67567637 67567641 67567643 67567631 67567641 67567643 67567631 67567641 67567643;}
@list l7:level1
{mso-level-text:"\(%1\)";
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l7:level2
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l7:level3
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l7:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l7:level5
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l7:level6
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l7:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l7:level8
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l7:level9
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0cm;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0cm;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="DE" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Dear Östen, Dear All,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">thanks for this making it more precise! However, then we seem to arrive at the question whether modal (more precisely: epistemic) operators are parts of propositions
or operate on them. If you argue for the latter, then your (or logicians’) point of view is justified: it is the epistemic operators which take scope over one another (and thus create recursiveness). However, since the operators scope over propositional content
(and there may be only “one” such content per clause), this anyway amounts to the possibility of chaining clauses with recursively inserted propositional content (which these operators comment on, or restrict if you like).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"> I don’t know whether this helps Vladimir. It seems that these problems (and their possible “diagnosis”) exist everywhere and are rather independent of
the structure of particular languages. That is, which criteria might there be for crosslinguistic variation, to be tested on empirical grounds?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Notably, it is intriguing that your example concerning possible recursivity of illocutionary force (</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt">“Björn commented
on Östen’s comment on Alex’s comment on Vladimir’s posting.”</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">) is based on assertive speech acts; these contain propositions (or at least imply them in the hidden content of the nouns/NPs
“comment” and “posting”). What about other speech acts, e.g., commands or wishes (which do not contain propositions)? Would that be something like “Tell him that he posts a message for her to finally submit her paper”, or “I wish you longed for your friends
to want you all the best”?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"> Are there any patterns for morphosyntactic coding of such things that may used to classify constructions and to compare languages?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Best,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Björn.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> Östen Dahl <oesten@ling.su.se>
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, October 25, 2025 4:59 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Wiemer, Bjoern <wiemerb@uni-mainz.de>; Juergen Bohnemeyer <jb77@buffalo.edu>; Alex Francois <alex.francois.cnrs@gmail.com>; Vladimir Panov <panovmeister@gmail.com><br>
<b>Cc:</b> LINGTYP@listserv.linguistlist.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Sv: [Lingtyp] What is propositional content?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="SV" style="font-size:11.0pt">Dear all,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="SV" style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt">I think it is not propositional content that is recursive, it’s rather modal operators that are (in modal logic) functions from propositions to propositions and thus can be recursive. And illocutionary
forces are not operators in that sense but rather properties of speech acts. But if you imagine an operator that takes you from one speech act to another you could get something more like modal operators. Try “comment”. “Björn commented on Östen’s comment
on Alex’s comment on Vladimir’s posting”. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt">Östen<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="SV" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Från:</span></b><span lang="SV" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> Wiemer, Bjoern <<a href="mailto:wiemerb@uni-mainz.de">wiemerb@uni-mainz.de</a>>
<br>
<b>Skickat:</b> den 25 oktober 2025 16:42<br>
<b>Till:</b> Juergen Bohnemeyer <<a href="mailto:jb77@buffalo.edu">jb77@buffalo.edu</a>>; Östen Dahl <<a href="mailto:oesten@ling.su.se">oesten@ling.su.se</a>>; Alex Francois <<a href="mailto:alex.francois.cnrs@gmail.com">alex.francois.cnrs@gmail.com</a>>;
Vladimir Panov <<a href="mailto:panovmeister@gmail.com">panovmeister@gmail.com</a>><br>
<b>Kopia:</b> <a href="mailto:LINGTYP@listserv.linguistlist.org">LINGTYP@listserv.linguistlist.org</a><br>
<b>Ämne:</b> RE: [Lingtyp] What is propositional content?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Dear All,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">just a small comment on Östen’s and Jürgen’s remarks. Don’t they lead to the conclusion that propositional content is recursive (just like embedding may be recursive)?
That is, there is, then, a theoretically infinite inclusion of propositions in propositions (as “objects” of mental acts, and of speech acts reporting on mental acts):<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<ol style="margin-top:0cm" start="1" type="1">
<li class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:0cm;mso-list:l7 level1 lfo3"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">It is probable [that it is likely [that x said [that presumably [y claimed [that … ]]]]]<o:p></o:p></span></li></ol>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">I wonder whether the same could be done with illocutionary force. I guess that it cannot. And if not I wonder why this might be so.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"> Does anybody know why this might be so?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Best,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Björn.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> Lingtyp <<a href="mailto:lingtyp-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org">lingtyp-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Juergen Bohnemeyer via Lingtyp<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, October 25, 2025 4:25 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Östen Dahl <<a href="mailto:oesten@ling.su.se">oesten@ling.su.se</a>>; Alex Francois <<a href="mailto:alex.francois.cnrs@gmail.com">alex.francois.cnrs@gmail.com</a>>; Vladimir Panov <<a href="mailto:panovmeister@gmail.com">panovmeister@gmail.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:LINGTYP@listserv.linguistlist.org">LINGTYP@listserv.linguistlist.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Lingtyp] What is propositional content?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Dear all — I had the same reaction as Östen - for me, the meaning of modal operators is also ‘propositional’, although it is of course distinct from that of their prejacent propositions. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">So what, then, is propositional content (if anything)? I think the term has its uses primarily in contexts in which we contrast meanings that can be spelled out in terms of propositions (i.e., representations of
states of affairs that can be true or false and may be objects of propositional attitudes such as belief and doubt) against meanings that cannot be spelled out in this manner. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Take the meaning of color terms. According to the theory of color semantics developed by Paul Kay and collaborators, the literal meaning (as opposed to associated metaphors) of the word
<i>green</i></span><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"></span><span style="color:black"> is a sensory quality with a prototype ('focal green’) that is neurophysiologically encoded. We can certainly express propositions about green things,
and even focal green (I just did) - but these propositions can never accurately capture or define the meaning of
<i>green</i>.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Now, some are strongly invested in the view that
<i>all</i> meaning is propositional content. Perhaps the most prominent scholar of this persuasion is Anna Wierzbicka. Here is Wierzbicka’s (1996: 306) analysis of green:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> X is green. =<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> in some places many things grow out of the ground<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> when one sees things like X one can think of this.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">I think everybody can judge for themselves whether they find this analysis convincing. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">In my view, there is quite a range of linguistic meanings that cannot adequately be captured in propositional terms. Aside from color terms and other expressions of sensory perception, I would add for example ideophones
(not necessarily all of them, especially not when you take ‘ideophone’ as the label of a language-specific category of expressions), expressives, honorifics and other social deictics, and so on. I would go as far as to suggest that even manner of motion verbs
such as <i>walk</i> and <i>run</i> have meanings that we understand because our motor system knows how to engage in these activities, not because we can define them propositionally.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Where to draw the boundary between propositional and non-propositional content has long been a fascinating question to me. There’s much more I could say about this, but I’ll stop here as I’m sure people have stopped
reading a while ago </span><span style="font-family:"Segoe UI Emoji",sans-serif;color:black">😉</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best — Juergen<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature">
<p style="margin:0cm"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black">Juergen Bohnemeyer (He/Him)<br>
Professor, Department of Linguistics<br>
University at Buffalo <br>
<br>
Office: 642 Baldy Hall, UB North Campus<br>
Mailing address: 609 Baldy Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260 <br>
Phone: (716) 645 0127 <br>
Fax: (716) 645 3825<br>
Email: </span><u><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:#0078D4"><a href="mailto:jb77@buffalo.edu" title="mailto:jb77@buffalo.edu"><span style="color:#0078D4">jb77@buffalo.edu</span></a></span></u><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black"><br>
Web: </span><u><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:#0563C1"><a href="http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~jb77/" title="http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~jb77/"><span style="color:#0563C1">http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~jb77/</span></a></span></u><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black"> <br>
<br>
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Office hours Tu/Th 3:30-4:30pm in 642 Baldy or via Zoom (Meeting ID 585 520 2411; Passcode Hoorheh) </span><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:black"><br>
<br>
There’s A Crack In Everything - That’s How The Light Gets In <br>
(Leonard Cohen) </span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">-- <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div id="mail-editor-reference-message-container">
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm;border-color:currentcolor currentcolor">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><b><span style="color:black">From:
</span></b><span style="color:black">Lingtyp <<a href="mailto:lingtyp-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org">lingtyp-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>> on behalf of Östen Dahl via Lingtyp <<a href="mailto:lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org">lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Saturday, October 25, 2025 at 09:26<br>
<b>To: </b>Alex Francois <<a href="mailto:alex.francois.cnrs@gmail.com">alex.francois.cnrs@gmail.com</a>>, Vladimir Panov <<a href="mailto:panovmeister@gmail.com">panovmeister@gmail.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc: </b><a href="mailto:LINGTYP@listserv.linguistlist.org">LINGTYP@listserv.linguistlist.org</a> <<a href="mailto:LINGTYP@listserv.linguistlist.org">LINGTYP@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [Lingtyp] What is propositional content?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Dear Vladimir, Alex, and all others,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">I think a logician would say that a sentence with “a modal comment” like (1) in Alex’s posting contains not one proposition but two: (i) the proposition that the supermarket is open on Sundays, (ii) the proposition
that (i) might be true. Both (i) and (ii) are entities that can be true or false. But this means that the propositional content of (1) is (ii) rather than (i), since that is what is expressed by the whole sentence and what the speaker claims is true.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">There is a tradition in linguistics to do things the way Alex proposes. I don’t know where it originally came from, but Fillmore in his 1968 paper “The Case for Case” divides the basic structure of sentence
into a “proposition” and a “modality constituent”. The difference between logicians and linguists may be that logicians tend to think of modal notions as objective while linguists regard them as subjective. The problem is that modalities may differ in this
regard. This could be a long discussion, but I will stop here.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Best,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Östen</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm;border-color:currentcolor currentcolor">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Från:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> Lingtyp <<a href="mailto:lingtyp-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org">lingtyp-bounces@listserv.linguistlist.org</a>>
<b>För </b>Alex Francois via Lingtyp<br>
<b>Skickat:</b> den 25 oktober 2025 13:16<br>
<b>Till:</b> Vladimir Panov <<a href="mailto:panovmeister@gmail.com">panovmeister@gmail.com</a>><br>
<b>Kopia:</b> <a href="mailto:LINGTYP@listserv.linguistlist.org">LINGTYP@listserv.linguistlist.org</a><br>
<b>Ämne:</b> Re: [Lingtyp] What is propositional content?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Dear Vladimir,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Thanks for an interesting question.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">In my understanding, the notion of "propositional content" stems from the logical analysis of language. It reflects the attempt to isolate, in an utterance, the reported state-of-affairs from
what the speaker says about it.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Thus if I say (1)
<i>The supermarket might even be open on Sundays</i>, one can propose to mentally separate:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<ul style="margin-top:0cm" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l1 level1 lfo6"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">the propositional content X: <br>
<the supermarket being open on Sundays></span><o:p></o:p></li><li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l1 level1 lfo6"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">the modal comment about that content X:<br>
<X might be true> = <it is possible for X to be true></span><o:p></o:p></li></ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Now if we compare (1) with </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-left:30.0pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">(2) <i>There is no way the supermarket would be open on Sundays</i>,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">we may say that both utterances share the exact same
<i>propositional content</i> X, but they include a different modal stance about it.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">In the case of (2), the modal comment would be <there's no way that X is true> = <it is necessary for X to be false>.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">________</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">The first author, I believe, to have formalised similar concepts is Thomas Aquinas ~ Tommaso d'Aquino (13th century), in his short
<i>De propositionibus modalibus</i> ['On modal propositions'] (which might be apocryphal). I found the original text
<u><span style="color:blue"><a href="https://www.corpusthomisticum.org/dpp.html">here</a></span></u> in Latin; a French translation
<u><span style="color:blue"><a href="http://docteurangelique.free.fr/bibliotheque/opuscules/39lespropositionsmodales.htm">here</a></span></u>;
<u><span style="color:blue"><a href="https://eprints.illc.uva.nl/id/eprint/2074/1/DS-2009-04.text.pdf#page=173">Uckelman (2009: 157-9)</a></span></u> has an English translation. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Aquinas contrasted the
<i>dictum</i> ["what is said" ≈propositional content]<br>
from the <i>modus</i> [the 'manner', i.e. what is said about the dictum]. His examples included:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">(3) <i>Necesse est Socratem currere.
</i>“For Socrates to run is necessarily true.”</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">(4) <i>Possibile est Socratem currere.
</i>“For Socrates to run is possible.”, </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">etc.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">In a passage which I find incredibly modern, Aquinas notes that polarity can affect sometimes the dictum, sometimes the modus:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">In (5) <i>Possibile est Socratem non currere</i> “It is possible for Socrates not to run”, the negation is internal to the dictum.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">In (6) <i>Non possibile est Socratem currere</i> “It is not possible for Socrates to run”, the negation is a property of the modus.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">(Orig. quote:
<i>Item sciendum est quod propositio modalis dicitur affirmativa vel negativa secundum affirmationem vel negationem modi, et non dicti.</i> which could be rendered: "Importantly, the modality will be said affirmative vs. negative depending on the polarity of
the modus, not of the dictum.")</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">________</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Aquinas' proposals have played a major role in formal logic; <br>
they were also introduced to linguistics by French linguist Charles Bally in 1932 (cf.
<u><span style="color:blue"><a href="https://hal.science/hal-02310043v1/">Gosselin 2015</a></span></u>).</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">The word <i>modus</i> is the source of our later concepts of
<i>mood</i> and <i>modality</i>.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">________</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">I just found an interesting paper by Per Martin-Löf “Are the objects of propositional attitudes propositions in the sense of propositional and predicate logic?” (<u><span style="color:blue"><a href="https://pml.flu.cas.cz/uploads/PML-Geneva19Dec03.pdf">2003</a></span></u>)
In this table, he compares Bally's contrast <i>modus</i> vs. <i>dictum</i> [actually from Aquinas] with proposals by other logicians and linguists:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"><img border="0" width="442" height="272" style="width:4.6083in;height:2.8333in" id="Bild_x0020_1" src="cid:image001.png@01DC45E7.43078340"></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Löf here proposes that the term “propositional content” was mostly used by John Searle. I guess this refers to Searle's 1969
<i>Speech acts</i>, though Löf does not elaborate.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Admittedly, "illocutionary force" is different from "modus", but there is indeed a filiation across these different notional couples.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Other people on this list will be able to point to specific passages in Searle's works.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">_______</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Finally, another attempt to adapt similar ideas to linguistics was Simon Dik's Functional grammar:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-left:30.0pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif">Dik, Simon. (1989).
<i>The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part I: The Structure of the Clause</i> (Vol. 9). Foris.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">At first glance, Dik's equivalent to the
<i>dictum</i> is what he calls the "state of affairs" (SoA), which he defines p.51:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><img border="0" width="471" height="393" style="width:4.9083in;height:4.0916in" id="Bild_x0020_2" src="cid:image002.png@01DC45E7.43078340"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">That said, Dik is worth reading because, rather than a mere binary contrast (such as
<i>dictum</i> vs. <i>modus</i>) he proposes to distinguish different logical / semantic levels of the utterance, organised in a fine-grained hierarchy (see his p.50):</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"><img border="0" width="366" height="408" style="width:3.8166in;height:4.25in" id="Bild_x0020_3" src="cid:image003.png@01DC45E7.43078340"></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Dik carefully distinguishes between SoA, possible fact, predication, proposition, clause... </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Different operators
</span><span style="font-family:"Courier New"">π</span><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> (e.g. Tense, Aspect, Modality, Polarity, Truth value, Illocutionary act...), and also what he calls "satellites"
</span><span style="font-family:"Courier New"">σ</span><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> (syntactic adjuncts etc), attach to different layers among these. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Interestingly, Dik describes one of his layers as “propositional content”, which he equates with “possible fact” (p.52):</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><img border="0" width="457" height="283" style="width:4.7583in;height:2.95in" id="Bild_x0020_4" src="cid:image004.png@01DC45E7.43078340"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="right" style="text-align:right"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">See also pp.294 ff. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Dik's concept of prop. content is more specific than the same term used by Searle or the
<i>dictum</i> of other authors;</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">In his terms, propositional content is of a "higher-order structure" than the core state-of-affairs.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">________</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">In my publications describing the Oceanic languages of northern Vanuatu, I have found such analytical tools (under the same or similar names) quite useful, particularly when describing tense,
aspect, modality or illocutionary force in different languages -- whether TAMP in Mwotlap (<u><span style="color:blue"><a href="https://marama.huma-num.fr/AFpub_books_e.htm#hide3:~:text=La%20S%C3%A9mantique%20du%20Pr%C3%A9dicat%20en%20Mwotlap">2003</a></span></u>,
<u><span style="color:blue"><a href="https://marama.huma-num.fr/AFpub_articles_e.htm#fcc">f/c c</a></span></u>), the Aorist in NV languages (<u><span style="color:blue"><a href="https://marama.huma-num.fr/AFpub_articles_e.htm#2009a">2009a</a></span></u>), the
Subjunctive in Hiw & Lo-Toga (<u><span style="color:blue"><a href="https://marama.huma-num.fr/AFpub_articles_e.htm#2010b">2010b</a></span></u>), etc.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">________</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">I hope this is useful.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">best</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Alex</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<hr size="2" width="70" style="width:52.5pt" align="left">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="wordsection1"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#45818E">Alex François</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:blue"><a href="http://www.lattice.cnrs.fr/en/alexandre-francois/" target="_blank">LaTTiCe</a></span></u><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> —
<u><span style="color:#3366CC"><a href="https://www.cnrs.fr/en" target="_blank" title="ENS"><span style="color:#3366CC">CNRS</span></a></span></u>
<u><span style="color:#3366CC"><a href="https://www.cnrs.fr/en" target="_blank" title="ENS"><span style="color:#3366CC">—</span></a></span></u>
<u><span style="color:#3366CC"><a href="https://www.ens.fr/laboratoire/lattice-langues-textes-traitements-informatiques-et-cognition-umr-8094" target="_blank" title="ENS"><span style="color:#3366CC">ENS</span></a></span></u>–<u><span style="color:#3366CC"><a href="https://www.psl.eu/en" target="_blank" title="ENS"><span style="color:#3366CC">PSL</span></a></span></u> —
<u><span style="color:#3366CC"><a href="http://www.sorbonne-nouvelle.fr/lattice-langues-textes-traitements-informatiques-cognition-umr-8094-3458.kjsp" target="_blank" title="ENS"><span style="color:#3366CC">Sorbonne nouvelle</span></a></span></u></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#3366CC"><a href="https://researchportalplus.anu.edu.au/en/persons/alex-francois" target="_blank"><span style="color:#3366CC">Australian National University</span></a></span></u><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#3366CC"><a href="http://alex.francois.online.fr/" target="_blank"><span style="color:#3366CC">Personal homepage</span></a></span></u><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:7.5pt">_________________________________________</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">---------- Forwarded message ---------<br>
From: <b>Vladimir Panov via Lingtyp</b> <<u><span style="color:blue"><a href="mailto:lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org">lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a></span></u>><br>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 at 03:00<br>
Subject: [Lingtyp] What is propositional content?<br>
To: <<u><span style="color:blue"><a href="mailto:LINGTYP@listserv.linguistlist.org">LINGTYP@listserv.linguistlist.org</a></span></u>><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear typologists,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In various traditions of linguistics, both "formal" and "functional", there is a habit to speak of "propositional content". I have a feeling that this term is very difficult to define, especially if one takes cross-linguistic variation
seriously. In practice, many linguistis tend to use the term as if the reader knew exactly what it means. Needles to say, the term has a long and complex history.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Are you aware of any relatively up-to-date and possibly typllogy-friendly literature which discusses this problem?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thank you,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Vladimir<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
Lingtyp mailing list<br>
<u><span style="color:blue"><a href="mailto:Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org" target="_blank">Lingtyp@listserv.linguistlist.org</a></span></u><br>
<u><span style="color:blue"><a href="https://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp" target="_blank">https://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp</a></span></u><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>