6.248 Latvian Language Policy

[The Linguist List]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List:  Vol-6-248. Sat 18 Feb 1995. ISSN: 1068-4875. Lines: 80
 
Subject: 6.248 Latvian Language Policy
 
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Asst. Editors: Ron Reck <rreck at emunix.emich.edu>
               Ann Dizdar <dizdar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
               Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin at emunix.emich.edu>
 
-------------------------Directory-------------------------------------
 
1)
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 1995 20:59:51 -0600 (CST)
From: NO SLEEP FOR THE WEARY (MITTONM at carleton.edu)
Subject: Latvian Language Policy
 
2)
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 1995 23:39:32 -0500 (EST)
From: Micheal Palmer (mpalmes at email.unc.edu)
 
3)
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 1995 10:26:38 +0100 (MET)
From: hartmut at ruc.dk (Hartmut Haberland)
Subject: Re: 6.192 Latvia's language policy
 
-------------------------Messages--------------------------------------
1)
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 1995 20:59:51 -0600 (CST)
From: NO SLEEP FOR THE WEARY (MITTONM at carleton.edu)
Subject: Latvian Language Policy
 
I have found the topic of "linguistic human rights violations" particularly
interesting, but I am a little confused as to what constitutes such a
violation.  Marc Picard writes, "Personally, I would hope that Latvians
would take any measures they deem necessary to get everybody in their
country to speak their language."  If someone were to issue such a statement
about the language situation in the United States (particularly with regards
to native speakers of Spanish who are residents/citizens of the US), I am
sure that some group would throw up its arms in protest of the oppression
of this segment of the population.  Is this what is meant by a "linguistic
human rights violation"?  Is it something more severe?  Or are we looking
at other countries and applying different standards than those which we apply
in the United States?
 
Mark Mitton
Carleton College  Northfield, MN 55057
mittonm at carleton.edu
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
2)
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 1995 23:39:32 -0500 (EST)
From: Micheal Palmer (mpalmes at email.unc.edu)
 
The intensity of recent postings on language policy left me a little
worried. Do these people (I won't mention names) also support an
English-only policy for the US? I certainly hope not. My home language
is Spanish, and I *would* consider it a violation of my linguistic human
rights to be forced to use English in situations where doing so is
required by nothing more than the law.
 
Micheal W. Palmer
Mellon Research Fellow
Department of Linguistics
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
3)
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 1995 10:26:38 +0100 (MET)
From: hartmut at ruc.dk (Hartmut Haberland)
Subject: Re: 6.192 Latvia's language policy
 
What about giving Martin the benefit of the doubt and assume that
"Russian-speaking Estonians" is a slip of the keyboard for "Russian-speaking
Latvians"?
Hartmut Haberland
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-6-248.