6.51 Sum: Markedness

The Linguist List linguist at tam2000.tamu.edu
Mon Jan 16 22:30:20 UTC 1995


----------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List:  Vol-6-51. Mon 16 Jan 1995. ISSN: 1068-4875. Lines: 166
 
Subject: 6.51 Sum: Markedness
 
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Asst. Editors: Ron Reck <rreck at emunix.emich.edu>
               Ann Dizdar <dizdar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
               Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin at emunix.emich.edu>
               Liz Bodenmiller <eboden at emunix.emich.edu>
 
-------------------------Directory-------------------------------------
 
1)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 95 12:57:53 EST
From: nartemev at ccs.carleton.ca (Natalia Artemeva)
Subject: Markedness -- bibliography
 
-------------------------Messages--------------------------------------
1)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 95 12:57:53 EST
From: nartemev at ccs.carleton.ca (Natalia Artemeva)
Subject: Markedness -- bibliography
 
        Dear List,
A couple of months ago I posted a request concerning
bibliography on markedness. Now, after I have written
my paper, I can present a list of referenses on markedness
for those who are interested in it.
 
 BIBLIOGRAPHY
 
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1987). Markedness and salience in second-language
acquisition.    Language learning, 37 (3), 385-407.
Battistella, E. L. (1990). Markedness: The evaluative superstructure of
language. Albany:       State University of New York Press.
Benson, B. (1986). The markedness differential hypothesis: Implications for
Vietnamese      speakers of English. In F. R. Eckman, E. A. Moravcsik & J. R.
Wirth (Eds.),   Markedness (pp. 271-289). New York: Plenum Press.
Birdsong, D. (1989). Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic
competence. Berlin:     Springer-Verlag.
Broselow, E. (1988). Second language acquisition. In J. Newmeyer (Ed.),
Linguistics:    The Cambridge survey. Vol. III. Language: Psychological and
biological aspects.     (pp. 194-209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cook, V. J. (1988). Chomsky's universal grammar: An introduction. Oxford, UK:
Basil   Blackwell.
Croft, W. (1990). Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Eckman, F. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis.
Language Learning, 27 (2), 315-330.
Eckman, F. (1985). The markedness differential hypothesis: Theory and
applications. In        Wheatley, B., Hastings, A., Eckman, F. R., Bell, L.,
Krukar, G. & R. Rutkovski       (Eds.), Current approaches to second language
acquisition. Proceedings of the         1984 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
linguistic symposium (pp. 3-21).        Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana
University Linguistic Club.
Eckman, F. (1988). Typological and parametric views on universals in second
language        acquisition. In S. Flynn & O'Neil, W. (Eds.), Linguistic
theory in second language       acquisition, (pp. 417-429).Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
 Publishers.
Eckman, F., Bell, L. & Nelson, D. (1988). On the generalization of relative
clause  instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language.
Applied Linguistics,    9 (1), 1-20.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford
University      Press.
Eubank, L. (1991). Introduction: Universal Grammar in the second language. In
        L. Eubank (Ed.), Point Counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second
language,       (pp. 1-48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Flynn, S. and O'Neil, W. (1988). Introduction. In S. Flynn & O'Neil, W.
(Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 1-24).
Dordrecht: Kluwer       Academic Publishers.
Gair, J. W. (1988). Kinds of markedness. In S. Flynn & O'Neil, W. (Eds.),
Linguistic      theory in second language acquisition (pp. 225-250).
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic      Publishers.
Gass, S. (1982). From theory to practice. In Hines, M. & Rutherford, W.
(Eds.), On TESOL'81 (pp. 129-139). Washington, DC.: Teachers of English
to Speakers of Other Languages.
Greenberg, J. H. (1966). Language universals: with special reference to
feature hierarchies.    The Hague: Mouton.
Haegmann, L. (1991). Introduction to Government and Binding theory. Oxford,
UK: Basil Blackwell.
Jakobson, R. and Waugh, L. R. (1987). The sound shape of language. Berlin:
Mouton de       Gruyter.
Liceras, J. M. (1985). The role of intake in the determination of learners'
competence. In  S. Gass and C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language
acquisition. Rowley,    MA: Newbury House.
Liceras, J. M. (1988a). Syntax and stylistics: more on the pro-drop parameter.
In J.   Pankhurst, M. Sharwood Smith & P. V. Buren (Eds.), Learnability and
second  languages: A book of readings (pp. 71-93). Dordrecht: Foris
Publications.
Liceras, J. M. (1988b). L2 learnability: Delimiting the domain of core grammar
as distinct     from the marked periphery. In S. Flynn & O'Neil, W. (Eds.),
Linguistic theory in    second language acquisition, (pp. 199-224). Dordrecht:
Kluwer Academic         Publishers.
Mazurkewich, I. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alteration by second
language        learners and linguistic theory. Language Learning, 34, 91-109.
Mazurkewich, I. (1988). The acquisition of infinitive and gerund complements
by  second      language learners. In S. Flynn & O'Neil, W. (Eds.),
Linguistic theory in second language acquisition, (pp. 127-143).Dordrecht:
Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Moravcsik, E. & Wirth, J. (1986). Markedness - an overview. In F. R. Eckman,
E. A.   Moravcsik & J. R. Wirth (Eds.), Markedness (pp. 1-11). New York:
Plenum Press.
Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Social motivations for code-switching: Evidence from
Africa.         Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Phinney, M. (1987). The pro-drop parameter in second language acquisition.  In
T. Roeper       & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 221-238).
Dordrecht: D. Reidel    Publishing Company.
Rutherford, W. E. (1982). Markedness in second language acquisition.
Language        Learning, 32 (1), 85-108.
Rutherford, W. E. (1988). Grammatical theory and L2 acquisition: A brief
overview.  In   S. Flynn & O'Neil, W. (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second
language        acquisition, (pp. 404-416).Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
Publishers.
Safir, K. (1987). Comments on Wexler and Manzini.  In T. Roeper & E. Williams
(Eds.),         Parameter setting (pp. 77-89). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing
Company.
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1975). Letters and notes (pp. 162-163). The Hague: Mouton.
Wexler, K. & Manzini, M. R. (1987). Parameters and learnability in Binding
Theory. In      T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter Setting (pp.
41- 76).
Dordrecht: D.   Reidel Publishing Company.
White, L. (1986). Markedness and parameter setting: Some implications for a
theory of       adult second language acquisition. In F. R. Eckman, E. A.
Moravcsik & J .R.       Wirth   (Eds.), Markedness (pp. 309-327). New York:
Plenum Press.
White, L. (1987). A note on Phinney. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.),
Parameter       setting (pp. 239-246). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
White, L. (1988a). Universal grammar and language transfer. In J. Pankhurst,
M. Sharwood Smith & P. V. Buren (Eds.), Learnability and second languages: A
book of readings (pp. 36 -60). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
White, L.(1988b). Island effects in second language acquisition. In S. Flynn &
O'Neil, W.      (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition, (pp.
144-172).Dordrecht:     Kluwer Academic Publishers.
White, L. (1989). Universal grammar and second language acquisition.
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
White, L. (1992). Universal grammar: Is it just a new name for old problems?
In  S. Gass     & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning
(217-232).      Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Wolfe Quintero, K. (1992). Learnability and the acquisition of extraction in
relative clauses        and wh-questions. SSLA, 14, 39-70.
Zobl, H. (1983). Markedness and the projection problem. Language Learning, 33
(3),    293-313.
Zobl, H. (1988). Configurationality and the subset principle: the acquisition
of V1 by        Japanese learners of English. In J. Pankhurst, M. Sharwood
Smith & P. V. Buren     (Eds.), Learnability and second languages: A book
of readings (pp. 116-131).      Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Zobl, H. (1994). Markedness aspects of case-marking in L1 French - L2
English
Interlanguage. Unpublished manuscript.
 
I also would like to express my gratitude to all
my correspondents.
Many thanks to
linguist at tamsun.tamu.edu
Jane Edwards (edwards at cogsci.berkeley.edu)
Mihoko Kubota
 
kubota at stc.ipa.go.jp
Eva Mendieta-Lombardo
emendiet at iunhaw1.iun.indiana.edu
 
                Natasha Artemeva (nartemev at ccs.carleton.ca)
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-6-51.



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list