7.1013, Disc: Indic scripts

The Linguist List linguist at tam2000.tamu.edu
Thu Jul 11 15:47:05 UTC 1996


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List:  Vol-7-1013. Thu Jul 11 1996. ISSN: 1068-4875. Lines:  70
 
Subject: 7.1013, Disc: Indic scripts
 
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at emunix.emich.edu> (On Leave)
            T. Daniel Seely: Eastern Michigan U. <dseely at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Associate Editor:  Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin at emunix.emich.edu>
Assistant Editors: Ron Reck <rreck at emunix.emich.edu>
                   Ann Dizdar <dizdar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
                   Annemarie Valdez <avaldez at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Editor for this issue: dizdar at tam2000.tamu.edu (Ann Dizdar)
 
---------------------------------Directory-----------------------------------
1)
Date:  Wed, 03 Jul 1996 18:08:25 BST
From:  L.M.Fosse at internet.no (Lars Martin Fosse)
Subject:  Re: 7.971, Disc: Indic scripts, standard Lao
 
---------------------------------Messages------------------------------------
1)
Date:  Wed, 03 Jul 1996 18:08:25 BST
From:  L.M.Fosse at internet.no (Lars Martin Fosse)
Subject:  Re: 7.971, Disc: Indic scripts, standard Lao
 
 
>Date:  Mon, 01 Jul 1996 21:28:29 CDT
>From:  pdaniels at press-gopher.uchicago.edu (Peter Daniels)
>Subject:  Re: 7.959, Qs: Scripts
>
>Regarding David Solnit's query about Southeast Asian scripts, I would
>immodestly state that the basic reference work is now *The World's Writing
>Systems*, edited by me and William Bright (Oxford UP, 1996), wherein you
>will find some rather nice charts and quite full bibliography on the ancestry
>of South and Southeast Asian scripts. I believe that none of our authors use
>so vague a term as "Pali scripts"; "Pali" is sort of a catch-all term for
>"everything post-
>Sanskrit and pre-modern, particularly if it relates to Buddhism," as far as
>I can tell as a non-Indicist.
 
Re the term Pali: Pali is not a "catch-all term for everything
post-Sanskrit and pre-modern". Ancient Indic languages after Vedic Sanskrit
- the oldest stage - are divided into Sanskrit, Pali, Prakrit (which is
really a group of languages younger than Pali), Apabhramsha (the last stage
of Ancient Indic before the modern Neo-Aryan Languages emerge). Pali,
Prakrit and Apabhramsha are also referred to as MIA or Middle Indo-Aryan
languages. Please not that Dravidian languages are not included here!
 
Best regards,
 
Lars Martin Fosse
 
 
 
Dr. art. Lars Martin Fosse
Haugerudveien 76, Leil. 114,
N-0674 OSLO Norway
 
Tel: +47 22 32 12 19
Fax: +47 22 32 12 19
 
E-mail: L.M.Fosse at internet.no
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-7-1013.



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list