7.372, Qs: Modality, Chinese Texts, Phonological Theory

[The Linguist List]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List:  Vol-7-372. Sat Mar 9 1996. ISSN: 1068-4875. Lines:  116
 
Subject: 7.372, Qs: Modality, Chinese Texts, Phonological Theory
 
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at emunix.emich.edu> (On Leave)
            T. Daniel Seely: Eastern Michigan U. <dseely at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Associate Editor:  Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin at emunix.emich.edu>
Assistant Editors: Ron Reck <rreck at emunix.emich.edu>
                   Ann Dizdar <dizdar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
                   Annemarie Valdez <avaldez at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Editor for this issue: lveselin at emunix.emich.edu (Ljuba Veselinova)
 
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then  strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list.   This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
 
---------------------------------Directory-----------------------------------
1)
Date:  Fri, 08 Mar 1996 03:01:05 PST
From:  hughes at unixg.ubc.ca (Ken Hughes)
Subject:  Modality, intentionality, and infinitival TO
 
2)
Date:  Fri, 08 Mar 1996 12:19:20 GMT
From:  P.Woods at dcs.shef.ac.uk (Paul Woods)
Subject:  Segmentation of Chinese texts by computer
 
3)
Date:  Fri, 08 Mar 1996 08:23:36 PST
From:  gldsmth at u.washington.edu (John Goldsmith)
 
---------------------------------Messages------------------------------------
1)
Date:  Fri, 08 Mar 1996 03:01:05 PST
From:  hughes at unixg.ubc.ca (Ken Hughes)
Subject:  Modality, intentionality, and infinitival TO
 
 
I'm finishing up a thesis that examines a phenomenology of verbal
inflection and modality.  I'm looking at a narrow interpretation of
'syntactic intentionality' that I think is evident in infinitival TO
and zero morphs in English and German modal auxiliaries.
 
When I say intentionality, I mean intentionality in an old-fashioned
Husserlian sense as intentionality-as-directedness (not
intentionality- as-intensionality) under constrained grammatical views
observed in the patterning of infinitival TO (perhaps especially so
when it is 'semantically empty'), in periphrastic modal forms, and in
related structures such as causatives, verbs of perception, and the
like.
 
Whatever syntactic category infinitival TO belongs to (be it INFLo,
some other inflectional head, or some unique category of its own) I
want to assert that its referent seems to be what does the heavy
lifting in the generation of sentential modality.  This doesn't seem
too odd to assert but one consequence of this is that a modal verb
(excepting OUGHT) ends up looking something like:
 
        M  -->  [ TNS V [ INFLo? ]]        (with two INFL nodes?).
 
This is rather ugly, but it seems clear that something special needs
to be said about infinitival TO and modal AUX.
 
I'm interested in any comments, related mysteries, or refutations.
(Note that this grammar uses only a reduced form of Chomsky 1980.)
I'll summarize these, along with previous data collection, in April.
 
Thanks for your attentions,
 
  Ken Hughes   hughes at unixg.ubc.ca   Science Education, UBC
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2)
Date:  Fri, 08 Mar 1996 12:19:20 GMT
From:  P.Woods at dcs.shef.ac.uk (Paul Woods)
Subject:  Segmentation of Chinese texts by computer
 
 
Hello, I am looking at developing efficient, simple, and robust
computer techniques of segmenting Chinese texts for the purposes of
information extraction.If you have any suggestions for papers,
books,or people that I might be able to contact, I'd be very grateful.
 
Thanks,
Paul Woods.
Uni of Sheffield
UK.
 
http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~paulw
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3)
Date:  Fri, 08 Mar 1996 08:23:36 PST
From:  gldsmth at u.washington.edu (John Goldsmith)
 
I am constructing a book of readings in phonological theory in the
generative era, and I'd be grateful for any thoughts or suggestions
along these lines, especially from people who teach phonology and who
have favorite articles (or books) which they especially like for their
students to reach but which are difficult or impossible for the
students to get hold of.
 
Send your nominations to
John Goldsmith
gldsmth at sapir.uchicago.edu
 
Thanks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-7-372.