8.539, Sum: Scope Ambiguities
linguist at linguistlist.org
linguist at linguistlist.org
Fri Apr 18 14:20:47 UTC 1997
LINGUIST List: Vol-8-539. Fri Apr 18 1997. ISSN: 1068-4875.
Subject: 8.539, Sum: Scope Ambiguities
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
T. Daniel Seely: Eastern Michigan U. <seely at linguistlist.org>
Review Editor: Andrew Carnie <carnie at linguistlist.org>
Associate Editors: Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
Ann Dizdar <ann at linguistlist.org>
Assistant Editor: Sue Robinson <sue at linguistlist.org>
Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
Zhiping Zheng <zzheng at online.emich.edu>
Home Page: http://linguistlist.org/
************************************************
During the month of April, you may make credit card donations to
LINGUIST via the Cascadilla Press web site:
http://www.cascadilla.com/linglist.html
If you believe LINGUIST is a valuable service, please contribute to
the LINGUIST Editorial Support Fund, which pays our student editors.
***********************************************
Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <seely at linguistlist.org>
=================================Directory=================================
1)
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 14:51:56 +0900
From: Eung-Cheon Hah <echeon at interpia.net>
Subject: Scope Ambiguities
-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 14:51:56 +0900
From: Eung-Cheon Hah <echeon at interpia.net>
Subject: Scope Ambiguities
Dear linguists,
A couple of weeks ago, I posted a questionnaire on scope ambiguities.
Eight people, some of them with valuable comments, responded to the
questionnaire. A short summary is given below with the result in the
parenthesis of each sentence. I'd like to express my heartful thanks to
the following linguists.
Deborah Milam Berkley <dberkley at babel.ling.nwu.edu>
Barbara Lazenby Simpson <bsimpson at tcd.ie>
stephen p spackman <stephen at acm.org>
Chris Johns <csrj100 at hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Roland Stuckardt <stuckardt at compuserve.com>
George Huttar 709 2400 <George_Huttar at SIL.ORG>
spencer at rainbow.net.au
"H Stephen Straight (Binghamton University/SUNY)"
<sstraigh at binghamton.edu>
*************************<Questionnaire>****************************
Please mark with +A if the following sentences are ambiguous, with +mA
if they are marginally ambiguous, and with -A if they are not ambiguous
at all.
...................
I. Between "do = expect/hope/intend to visit" and "do =visit"
(1) Which student expects/hopes/intends to visit which city that you do?
(+A: 37.5%) (+mA: 37.5%) (-A: 25%)
...................
II. Between 'cardinals'/'some'/'what' and 'every'/'most'
(2) a. Some congressional aide asked to see every report.
(+A: 12.5%) (+mA: 25%) (-A: 62.5%)
b. Some congressional aide asked John to see every report.
(+A: 12.5%) (+mA: 37.5%) (-A: 50%)
c. Some congressional aide saw every report.
(+A: 37.5%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 62.5%)
(3) a. At least two American tour groups expect to visit every European
country this year.
(+A: 37.5%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 50%)
b. At least two American tour groups expect to visit every European
country next year.
(+A: 37.5%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 62.5%)
c. At least two American tour groups visited every European country
last year.
(+A: 37.5%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 50%)
(4) At least one tourist wants to visit every city.
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 25%) (-A: 50%)
(5) a. Some agency intends to send aid to every Bosnian city this year.
(+A: 37.5%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 62.5%)
b. Some agency intends to send aid to every Bosnian city next year.
(+A: 50%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 50%)
c. Some agency sent aid to every Bosnian city last year.
(+A: 50%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 50%)
(6) a. At least four recreational vehicles tried to stop at most AAA
approved campsites last year.
(+A: 75%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 25%)
b. At least four recreational vehicles stopped at most AAA approved
campsites last year.
(+A: 37.5%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 50%)
(7) At least two American tour groups are expected to visit every
European country this year.
(+A: 62.5%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 37.5%)
(8) Some agency is expected to send aide to every Bosnian city this
year.
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 37.5%) (-A: 37.5%)
(9) At least four recreational vehicles are expected to stop at most
AAA
approved campsites this year.
(+A: 50%) (+mA: 25%) (-A: 25%)
(10) Some congressional aide is expected to see every report.
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 62.5%)
(11) a. Someone expects to dance with every woman.
(+A: 50%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 37.5%)
b. Someone wants to dance with every woman.
(+A: 62.5%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 25%)
(12) a. Someone promised her to invite everyone.
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 62.5%)
b. Someone persuaded her to invite everyone.
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 50%)
c. Someone persuaded her that she should invite everyone.
(+A: 12.5%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 75%)
d. John promised someone to invite everyone.
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 75%)
e. John persuaded someone to invite everyone.
(+A: 37.5%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 62.5%)
=====>One person was mute on (12a,b,c)
(13) a. What did everyone make a plan to say?
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 62.5%)
b. What did everyone plan to say?
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 25%) (-A: 50%)
(14) a. What did you make the claim that everyone said?
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 37.5%)
====>Three people judged (14a) to be ungrammatical or unacceptable.
b. What did you claim that everyone said?
(+A: 12.5%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 75%)
...................
III. Between 'who' and 'everyone'
(15) a. Who does everyone think you saw?
(+A: 12.5%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 75%)
b. Who does everyone think saw you?
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 75%)
******************************************************************************
Best wishes,
Eung-Cheon Hah
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-8-539
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list